Rechtsprechung
| EGMR, 03.11.2015 - 4184/15, 4317/15, 4323/15, 5028/15, 5053/15 |
Zitiervorschläge
EGMR, Entscheidung vom 03.11.2015 - 4184/15, 4317/15, 4323/15, 5028/15, 5053/15 (https://dejure.org/2015,35165)
EGMR, Entscheidung vom 03. November 2015 - 4184/15, 4317/15, 4323/15, 5028/15, 5053/15 (https://dejure.org/2015,35165)
Tipp: Um den Kurzlink (hier: https://dejure.org/2015,35165) schnell in die Zwischenablage zu kopieren, können Sie die Tastenkombination Alt + R verwenden - auch ohne diesen Bereich zu öffnen.
Volltextveröffentlichung
- Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte
OTEGI MONDRAGON AND OTHERS v. SPAIN
Partly inadmissible (englisch)
Sonstiges
- Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte (Verfahrensmitteilung)
OTEGI MONDRAGON AND OTHERS v. SPAIN
Verfahrensgang
- EGMR, 03.11.2015 - 4184/15, 4317/15, 4323/15, 5028/15, 5053/15
- EGMR, 06.11.2018 - 4184/15
Wird zitiert von ... (0) Neu Zitiert selbst (4)
- EGMR, 25.11.1993 - 14191/88
HOLM v. SWEDEN
Auszug aus EGMR, 03.11.2015 - 4184/15
While the applicants pointed to P.C."s political affiliation as a sign of a lack of impartiality, the Court does not find any indication in the present case that P.C."s membership of a particular political party had any connection or link with the substance of the case before the Constitutional Court (see, Pabla Ky v. Finland, no. 47221/99, § 33, ECHR 2004-V, and mutatis mutandis, Holm v. Sweden, 25 November 1993, §§ 32-33, Series A no. 279-A). - EGMR, 16.07.1971 - 2614/65
RINGEISEN v. AUSTRIA
Auszug aus EGMR, 03.11.2015 - 4184/15
The Court observes that the mere fact that this judge had already participated in enforcement proceedings concerning a political party of which the applicants were members does not objectively justify any fears as to a lack of impartiality on the part of this judge (see mutatis mutandis, Diennet v. France, 26 September 1995, § 38, Series A no. 325-A; Ringeisen v. Austria, 16 July 1971, § 97, Series A no. 13; Thomann, cited above, § 63, and Faugel v. Austria (dec.), nos. - EGMR, 21.12.2000 - 33958/96
WETTSTEIN v. SWITZERLAND
Auszug aus EGMR, 03.11.2015 - 4184/15
What is decisive is whether this fear can be held to be objectively justified (see Ferrantelli and Santangelo v. Italy, 7 August 1996, § 58, Reports 1996-III, and Wettstein v. Switzerland, no. 33958/96, § 44, ECHR 2000-XII). - EGMR, 26.09.1995 - 18160/91
DIENNET v. FRANCE
Auszug aus EGMR, 03.11.2015 - 4184/15
The Court observes that the mere fact that this judge had already participated in enforcement proceedings concerning a political party of which the applicants were members does not objectively justify any fears as to a lack of impartiality on the part of this judge (see mutatis mutandis, Diennet v. France, 26 September 1995, § 38, Series A no. 325-A; Ringeisen v. Austria, 16 July 1971, § 97, Series A no. 13; Thomann, cited above, § 63, and Faugel v. Austria (dec.), nos.