Volltextveröffentlichung

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

  MYUMYUN v. BULGARIA

  Violation of Article 3 - Prohibition of torture (Article 3 - Torture;Positive obligations) (Procedural aspect);Non-pecuniary damage - award (Article 41 - Non-pecuniary damage;Just satisfaction) (englisch)

Sonstiges

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte (Verfahrensmitteilung)

  MYUMYUN c. BULGARIE

  Art. 3 MRK
  [FRA]

Wird zitiert von ... (6)Neu Zitiert selbst (8)

• EGMR, 08.07.1999 - 23536/94

  Strafrechtliche Verfolgung auf Grund der Veröffentlichung eines Buches mit …

  Auszug aus EGMR, 03.11.2015 - 67258/13

  It should be noted in this connection that the national authorities cannot be expected to discharge their positive obligations under Article 3 of the Convention by acting in breach of the requirements of its Article 7, one of which is that the criminal law must not be construed extensively to an accused's detriment (see, among many other authorities, Baskaya and Okçuoglu v. Turkey [GC], nos. 23536/94 and 24408/94, § 36, ECHR 1999-IV; Kononov v. Latvia [GC], no. 36376/04, § 185, ECHR 2010; and Del Río Prada v. Spain [GC], no. 42750/09, § 78, ECHR 2013).
• EGMR, 17.10.2006 - 52067/99

  OKKALI c. TURQUIE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 03.11.2015 - 67258/13

  Where that investigation has led to legal action before the courts, the requirements of Article 3 go beyond the investigation stage; the proceedings as a whole, including their judicial stage, must meet those requirements (see Okkali v. Turkey, no. 52067/99, § 65, ECHR 2006-XII (extracts); Zontul v. Greece, no. 12294/07, § 97, 17 January 2012; and Aleksakhin v. Ukraine, no. 31939/06, § 56, 19 July 2012, as regards proceedings relating to alleged ill-treatment by State agents, and Muta v. Ukraine, no. 37246/06, § 62, 31 July 2012; N.A. v. the Republic of Moldova, no. 13424/06, § 65, 24 September 2013; and Ceachir v. Moldova, no. 50115/06, § 46, 10 December 2013, as regards proceedings relating to alleged ill-treatment by private persons).
• EGMR, 19.07.2012 - 31939/06

  ALEKSAKHIN v. UKRAINE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 03.11.2015 - 67258/13

  Where that investigation has led to legal action before the courts, the requirements of Article 3 go beyond the investigation stage; the proceedings as a whole, including their judicial stage, must meet those requirements (see Okkali v. Turkey, no. 52067/99, § 65, ECHR 2006-XII (extracts); Zontul v. Greece, no. 12294/07, § 97, 17 January 2012; and Aleksakhin v. Ukraine, no. 31939/06, § 56, 19 July 2012, as regards proceedings relating to alleged ill-treatment by State agents, and Muta v. Ukraine, no. 37246/06, § 62, 31 July 2012; N.A. v. the Republic of Moldova, no. 13424/06, § 65, 24 September 2013; and Ceachir v. Moldova, no. 50115/06, § 46, 10 December 2013, as regards proceedings relating to alleged ill-treatment by private persons).

 
• EGMR, 15.10.2013 - 34529/10

  GUTSANOVI c. BULGARIE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 03.11.2015 - 67258/13

  The Court has already expressed concern that the offence of bodily harm under Articles 128-30 of the Bulgarian Criminal Code (see paragraph 28 above) does not appear sufficiently to take into account psychological suffering (see Hristovi v. Bulgaria, no. 42697/05, § 95, 11 October 2011, and Gutsanovi v. Bulgaria, no. 34529/10, § 91, ECHR 2013 (extracts)).
• EGMR, 16.04.2013 - 43531/08

  VELEV v. BULGARIA

  Auszug aus EGMR, 03.11.2015 - 67258/13

  It is true that in a more recent case it criticised the Bulgarian prosecuting authorities for failing to consider whether to bring charges under Article 287 in a clear case of ill-treatment of a suspect in the course of custodial interrogation which had led to confessions later used in the trial against him (see Lenev, cited above, § 123, as well as Velev v. Bulgaria, no. 43531/08, § 61, 16 April 2013).
• EGMR, 28.07.1999 - 25803/94

  Zur "Einzelfallprüfung" und "geltungszeitlichen Interpretation" im Rahmen des …

  Auszug aus EGMR, 03.11.2015 - 67258/13

  Its prohibition against torture and inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment is thus absolute, irrespective of the circumstances or the conduct of the person concerned, in particular whether he or she has committed or is suspected of committing an offence (see, among many other authorities, Selmouni v. France [GC], no. 25803/94, § 95, ECHR 1999-V; Ramirez Sanchez v. France [GC], no. 59450/00, § 116, ECHR 2006-IX; and Gäfgen v. Germany [GC], no. 22978/05, § 87, ECHR 2010).
• EGMR, 24.09.2013 - 13424/06

  N.A. c. RÉPUBLIQUE DE MOLDOVA

  Auszug aus EGMR, 03.11.2015 - 67258/13

  Where that investigation has led to legal action before the courts, the requirements of Article 3 go beyond the investigation stage; the proceedings as a whole, including their judicial stage, must meet those requirements (see Okkali v. Turkey, no. 52067/99, § 65, ECHR 2006-XII (extracts); Zontul v. Greece, no. 12294/07, § 97, 17 January 2012; and Aleksakhin v. Ukraine, no. 31939/06, § 56, 19 July 2012, as regards proceedings relating to alleged ill-treatment by State agents, and Muta v. Ukraine, no. 37246/06, § 62, 31 July 2012; N.A. v. the Republic of Moldova, no. 13424/06, § 65, 24 September 2013; and Ceachir v. Moldova, no. 50115/06, § 46, 10 December 2013, as regards proceedings relating to alleged ill-treatment by private persons).
• EGMR, 17.01.2012 - 12294/07

  ZONTUL c. GRECE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 03.11.2015 - 67258/13

  Where that investigation has led to legal action before the courts, the requirements of Article 3 go beyond the investigation stage; the proceedings as a whole, including their judicial stage, must meet those requirements (see Okkali v. Turkey, no. 52067/99, § 65, ECHR 2006-XII (extracts); Zontul v. Greece, no. 12294/07, § 97, 17 January 2012; and Aleksakhin v. Ukraine, no. 31939/06, § 56, 19 July 2012, as regards proceedings relating to alleged ill-treatment by State agents, and Muta v. Ukraine, no. 37246/06, § 62, 31 July 2012; N.A. v. the Republic of Moldova, no. 13424/06, § 65, 24 September 2013; and Ceachir v. Moldova, no. 50115/06, § 46, 10 December 2013, as regards proceedings relating to alleged ill-treatment by private persons).

• EGMR, 20.02.2024 - 6406/21

  M.G. v. LITHUANIA

  The Court's task therefore consists in reviewing whether and to what extent the courts, in reaching their conclusion, may be deemed to have submitted the case to the careful scrutiny required by Article 3 of the Convention, so that the deterrent effect of the judicial system in place and the significance of the role it is required to play in preventing violations of the prohibition of ill-treatment are not undermined (see Myumyun v. Bulgaria, no. 67258/13, §§ 66-67, 3 November 2015; Sabalic v. Croatia, no. 50231/13, § 97, 14 January 2021; and Vardanyan and Khalafyan v. Armenia, no. 2265/12, § 83, 8 November 2022).
• EGMR, 26.10.2017 - 28923/09

  AZZOLINA ET AUTRES c. ITALIE

  En effet, aux yeux de la Cour, l'origine du problème réside dans le fait qu'aucune des infractions pénales existantes n'apparaît à même d'englober toute la gamme de questions soulevées par un acte de torture dont un individu risque d'être victime (Myumyun c. Bulgarie, no 67258/13, § 77, 3 novembre 2015).
• EGMR, 26.10.2017 - 1442/14

  BLAIR ET AUTRES c. ITALIE

  En effet, aux yeux de la Cour, l'origine du problème réside dans le fait qu'aucune des infractions pénales existantes n'apparaît à même d'englober toute la gamme de questions soulevées par un acte de torture dont un individu risque d'être victime (Myumyun c. Bulgarie, no 67258/13, § 77, 3 novembre 2015).

 
• EGMR, 08.11.2022 - 2265/12

  VARDANYAN AND KHALAFYAN v. ARMENIA

  This includes the sanctions imposed at the end of those proceedings (see Myumyun v. Bulgaria, no. 67258/13, § 67, 3 November 2015).
• EGMR, 25.01.2018 - 33349/10

  SIDIROPOULOS ET PAPAKOSTAS c. GRÈCE

  Invoquant la jurisprudence de la Cour dans l'affaire Myumyun c. Bulgarie (no 67258/13, 3 novembre 2015), les requérants se plaignent que l'amende de 100 EUR imposée à C.E. dans le cadre de l'enquête administrative était manifestement disproportionnée à la gravité de l'infraction commise et qu'elle n'a aucun effet dissuasif sur les agents de l'État qui estimeraient ainsi pouvoir abuser en toute impunité des personnes se trouvant sous leur contrôle.
• EGMR, 14.06.2022 - 56070/18

  STOYANOVA v. BULGARIA

  It cannot therefore be said that this aspect of the case reveals a lack of determination on the part of the Bulgarian authorities to hold the attackers to account (see, mutatis mutandis, Myumyun v. Bulgaria, no. 67258/13, § 72, 3 November 2015; also contrast Identoba and Others v. Georgia, no. 73235/12, § 75, 12 May 2015, and M.C. and A.C. v. Romania, no. 12060/12, §§ 120-23, 12 April 2016).