Rechtsprechung
| EGMR, 04.01.2007 - 39658/05 |
Zitiervorschläge
Tipp: Um den Kurzlink (hier: https://dejure.org/2007,68699) schnell in die Zwischenablage zu kopieren, können Sie die Tastenkombination Alt + R verwenden - auch ohne diesen Bereich zu öffnen.
Volltextveröffentlichung
- Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte
SMITH v. THE UNITED KINGDOM
Art. 8 MRK
Inadmissible (englisch)
Wird zitiert von ... (0) Neu Zitiert selbst (4)
- EGMR, 16.02.2000 - 27798/95
AMANN c. SUISSE
Auszug aus EGMR, 04.01.2007 - 39658/05
Further, it is clear that no public authority has interfered with the applicant's private life by the collection or storage of data (c.f. Amann v. Switzerland [GC], no. 27798/95, ECHR 2000-II). - EGMR, 04.05.2000 - 28341/95
ROTARU v. ROMANIA
Auszug aus EGMR, 04.01.2007 - 39658/05
This is therefore not a case where the applicant seeks access to files holding information about his identity or personal history, whether with a view to correcting any errors in those records or preventing misuse of personal information (e.g. Rotaru v. Romania [GC], no. 28341/95, ECHR 2000-V) or to uncovering information with formative implications for his or her personality (e.g. Gaskin v. the United Kingdom, judgment of 7 July 1989, Series A no. 160, p. 16, § 39; Mikulic v. Croatia, no. 53176/99, § 54, ECHR 2002-I). - EGMR, 07.02.2002 - 53176/99
MIKULIC v. CROATIA
Auszug aus EGMR, 04.01.2007 - 39658/05
This is therefore not a case where the applicant seeks access to files holding information about his identity or personal history, whether with a view to correcting any errors in those records or preventing misuse of personal information (e.g. Rotaru v. Romania [GC], no. 28341/95, ECHR 2000-V) or to uncovering information with formative implications for his or her personality (e.g. Gaskin v. the United Kingdom, judgment of 7 July 1989, Series A no. 160, p. 16, § 39; Mikulic v. Croatia, no. 53176/99, § 54, ECHR 2002-I). - EGMR, 07.07.1989 - 10454/83
GASKIN v. THE UNITED KINGDOM
Auszug aus EGMR, 04.01.2007 - 39658/05
This is therefore not a case where the applicant seeks access to files holding information about his identity or personal history, whether with a view to correcting any errors in those records or preventing misuse of personal information (e.g. Rotaru v. Romania [GC], no. 28341/95, ECHR 2000-V) or to uncovering information with formative implications for his or her personality (e.g. Gaskin v. the United Kingdom, judgment of 7 July 1989, Series A no. 160, p. 16, § 39; Mikulic v. Croatia, no. 53176/99, § 54, ECHR 2002-I).