Volltextveröffentlichung

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

  CORSACOV v. MOLDOVA

  Art. 3, Art. 13, Art. 41 MRK
  Violation of Art. 3 Violation of Art. 13 Non-pecuniary damage - financial award Costs and expenses partial award - Convention proceedings (englisch)

Verfahrensgang

• EGMR, 13.09.2005 - 18944/02
• EGMR, 04.04.2006 - 18944/02
• EGMR, 06.12.2018 - 18944/02

Wird zitiert von ... (7)Neu Zitiert selbst (6)

• EGMR, 25.11.1999 - 23118/93

  NILSEN AND JOHNSEN v. NORWAY

  Auszug aus EGMR, 04.04.2006 - 18944/02

  The Court recalls that in order for costs and expenses to be included in an award under Article 41, it must be established that they were actually and necessarily incurred and were reasonable as to quantum (see, for example, Nilsen and Johnsen v. Norway [GC], no. 23118/93, § 62, ECHR 1999-VIII).
• EGMR, 27.06.2000 - 21986/93

  Verursachung des Todes eines Gefangenen in türkischer Haft - Umfang der …

  Auszug aus EGMR, 04.04.2006 - 18944/02

  The fact that pain or suffering was deliberately inflicted for the purpose of obtaining a confession is a further factor to be taken into account in deciding whether ill-treatment amounted to torture (Aksoy v. Turkey, judgment of 18 December 1996, Reports 1996-VI, § 64; Salman v. Turkey, [GC], no. 21986/93, § 114, ECHR 2000-VII).
• EGMR, 11.07.2000 - 20869/92

  DIKME c. TURQUIE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 04.04.2006 - 18944/02

  Having regard to its previous case-law in respect of Article 3 (see in particular Selmouni v. France, cited above; Dikme v. Turkey, no. 20869/92, ECHR 2000-VIII; Khudoyorov v. Russia, no. 6847/02, ECHR 2005-... (extracts)) and making its assessment on an equitable basis, the Court awards the entire amount claimed by the applicant, plus any tax that may be chargeable on it.

 
• EGMR, 08.11.2005 - 6847/02

  KHOUDOÏOROV c. RUSSIE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 04.04.2006 - 18944/02

  Having regard to its previous case-law in respect of Article 3 (see in particular Selmouni v. France, cited above; Dikme v. Turkey, no. 20869/92, ECHR 2000-VIII; Khudoyorov v. Russia, no. 6847/02, ECHR 2005-... (extracts)) and making its assessment on an equitable basis, the Court awards the entire amount claimed by the applicant, plus any tax that may be chargeable on it.
• EGMR, 27.04.1988 - 9659/82

  BOYLE AND RICE v. THE UNITED KINGDOM

  Auszug aus EGMR, 04.04.2006 - 18944/02

  The applicant's complaints in this regard were therefore "arguable" for the purposes of Article 13 (see the Boyle and Rice v. the United Kingdom judgment of 27 April 1988, Series A no. 131, p. 23, § 52).
• EGMR, 04.12.1995 - 18896/91

  RIBITSCH c. AUTRICHE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 04.04.2006 - 18944/02

  It is not sufficient for the State to refer merely to the acquittal of the accused police officers in the course of a criminal prosecution, and consequently, the acquittal of officers on a charge of having assaulted an individual will not discharge the burden of proof on the State under Article 3 of the Convention to show that the injuries suffered by that individual whilst under police control were not caused by the police officers (Ribitsch v. Austria, judgment of 4 December 1995, Series A no. 336, §§ 34, 38).

• EGMR, 03.07.2008 - 7188/03

  CHEMBER v. RUSSIA

  Si les juridictions civiles ont en théorie la faculté d'apprécier les faits de manière indépendante, en pratique le poids accordé à une enquête pénale préalable est si important que même une preuve contraire extrêmement convaincante fournie par un plaignant est souvent jugée « non pertinente ", si bien que le recours devant elles se révélerait purement théorique et illusoire (Menecheva c. Russie, no 59261/00, § 76, CEDH 2006-III, et Corsacov c. Moldova, no 18944/02, § 82, 4 avril 2006).
• EGMR, 07.05.2015 - 20136/11

  ILIEVSKA v.

  The Court has held on many occasions that where a person is injured while in detention or otherwise under the control of the police, any such injury will give rise to a strong presumption that the person was subjected to ill-treatment (see Corsacov v. Moldova, no. 18944/02, § 55, 4 April 2006, and Bursuc v. Romania, no. 42066/98, § 80, 12 October 2004).
• EGMR, 23.07.2015 - 24312/10

  ANDONOVSKI v.

  The Court has held on many occasions that where a person is injured while in detention or otherwise under the control of the police, any such injury will give rise to a strong presumption that the person was subjected to ill-treatment (see Corsacov v. Moldova, no. 18944/02, § 55, 4 April 2006, and Bursuc v. Romania, no. 42066/98, § 80, 12 October 2004).

 
• EGMR, 08.11.2011 - 15526/10

  V.D. v. CROATIA

  The Court has held on many occasions that where a person is injured while in detention or otherwise under the control of the police, any such injury will give rise to a strong presumption that the person was subjected to ill-treatment (Corsacov v. Moldova, no. 18944/02, § 55, 4 April 2006; and Bursuc v. Romania, no. 42066/98, § 80, 12 October 2004).
• EGMR, 26.04.2012 - 41356/08

  BUTOLEN v. SLOVENIA

  Moreover, where a person is injured while in detention or otherwise under the control of the police, any such injury will give rise to a strong presumption that the person was subjected to ill-treatment (see Corsacov v. Moldova, no. 18944/02, § 55, 4 April 2006, and Bursuc v. Romania, no. 42066/98, § 80, 12 October 2004).
• EGMR, 23.06.2009 - 1926/03

  STOJNSEK v. SLOVENIA

  The Court has held on many occasions that where a person is injured while in detention or otherwise under the control of the police, any such injury will give rise to a strong presumption that the person was subjected to ill-treatment (see, among many other authorities, Corsacov v. Moldova, no. 18944/02, § 55, 4 April 2006).
• EGMR, 10.05.2011 - 28847/08

  GLADOVIC v. CROATIA

  The Court has held on many occasions that where a person is injured while in detention or otherwise under the control of the police, any such injury will give rise to a strong presumption that the person was subjected to ill-treatment (Corsacov v. Moldova, no. 18944/02, § 55, 4 April 2006; and Bursuc v. Romania, no. 42066/98, § 80, 12 October 2004).