Rechtsprechung
   EGMR, 04.04.2006 - 33352/02   

Sie müssen eingeloggt sein, um diese Funktion zu nutzen.

Sie haben noch kein Nutzerkonto? In weniger als einer Minute ist es eingerichtet und Sie können sofort diese und weitere kostenlose Zusatzfunktionen nutzen.

| | Was ist die Merkfunktion?
Ablegen in
Benachrichtigen, wenn:




 
Alle auswählen
 

Zitiervorschläge

https://dejure.org/2006,65996
EGMR, 04.04.2006 - 33352/02 (https://dejure.org/2006,65996)
EGMR, Entscheidung vom 04.04.2006 - 33352/02 (https://dejure.org/2006,65996)
EGMR, Entscheidung vom 04. April 2006 - 33352/02 (https://dejure.org/2006,65996)
Tipp: Um den Kurzlink (hier: https://dejure.org/2006,65996) schnell in die Zwischenablage zu kopieren, können Sie die Tastenkombination Alt + R verwenden - auch ohne diesen Bereich zu öffnen.

Volltextveröffentlichung

 
Sortierung



Kontextvorschau





Hinweis: Klicken Sie auf das Sprechblasensymbol, um eine Kontextvorschau im Fließtext zu sehen. Um alle zu sehen, genügt ein Doppelklick.

Wird zitiert von ... (18)

  • EGMR, 02.10.2018 - 17229/13

    FEDCHENKO v. RUSSIA (No. 5)

    The Government further argued that the domestic courts had duly balanced the applicant's rights under Article 10 of the Convention and the plaintiff's rights protected under Article 8. They relied, inter alia, on Keller v. Hungary (dec.), no. 33352/02, 4 April 2006; Lindon, Otchakovsky-Laurens and July v. France [GC], nos.

    Having regard to the foregoing, the Court concludes that the balancing exercise carried out by the domestic courts did not take sufficiently into account all the standards established in the Court's case-law under Article 10 of the Convention (compare and contrast Keller v. Hungary (dec.), no. 33352/02, 4 April 2006, and Kwiecie?? v. Poland, no. 51744/99, § 52, 9 January 2007).

  • EGMR, 07.06.2016 - 17676/09

    CICAD c. SUISSE

    Enfin, la Cour observe que, après avoir soigneusement mis en balance les droits concurrents dans la présente affaire (Keller c. Hongrie (déc.), no 33352/02, 4 avril 2006 ; PETA Deutschland, précité, § 47 ; et Bestry c. Pologne, no 57675/10, § 66, 3 novembre 2015), les juridictions nationales ont conclu que W.O. n'avait pas à tolérer l'atteinte à ses droits de la personnalité causée par l'allégation grave formulée par l'association requérante.
  • EGMR, 03.04.2012 - 43206/07

    Kaperzyński ./. Polen

    Furthermore, in assessing the proportionality of the interference, the nature and severity of the sanction imposed are also factors to be taken into account (see, for example, Keller v. Hungary (dec.), no. 33352/02, 4 April 2006; Skalka v. Poland, no. 43425/98, §§ 41-42, 27 May 2003 and Kwiecien v. Poland, no. 51744/99, § 56, ECHR 2007-I).
  • EGMR, 09.01.2007 - 51744/99

    KWIECIEN v. POLAND

    As regards the reasons cited by the domestic courts to justify the interference with the applicant's right to freedom of expression, the Court first notes that the Polish courts, despite the applicant's reliance on Article 10 of the Convention in the appellate proceedings, failed to recognise that the present case involved a conflict between the right to freedom of expression and the protection of the reputation and the rights of others and so did not carry out the relevant balancing exercise (see, mutatis mutandis, Keller v. Hungary (dec.), no. 33352/02, 4 April 2006).
  • EGMR, 13.01.2015 - 34447/05

    MARIAN MACIEJEWSKI v. POLAND

    However, the balancing exercise carried out by the domestic courts did not take sufficiently into account all standards established in the Court's case-law under Article 10 of the Convention (compare and contrast, Keller v. Hungary (dec.), no. 33352/02, 4 April 2006; Kwiecien v. Poland, no. 51744/99, § 52, 9 January 2007).
  • EGMR, 14.10.2014 - 48723/07

    STANKIEWICZ AND OTHERS v. POLAND

    In consequence, the judicial authorities did not carry out a careful balancing exercise between the right to impart information and protection of the reputation or rights of others (compare and contrast, Keller v. Hungary (dec.), no. 33352/02, 4 April 2006; Kwiecien v. Poland, no. 51744/99, § 52, 9 January 2007; Blaja News sp.
  • EGMR, 15.11.2011 - 39900/06

    Semik-Orzech ./. Polen

    They carried out a careful balancing exercise between the interests involved (compare and contrast Keller v. Hungary (dec.), no. 33352/02, 4 April 2006 and Kwiecien v. Poland, no. 51744/99, § 52, ECHR 2007-...).
  • EGMR, 22.10.2009 - 25333/06

    EUROPAPRESS HOLDING D.O.O. v. CROATIA

    (e) The nature and severity of the sanction imposed are also factors to be taken into account when assessing the proportionality of the interference under Article 10 of the Convention (see, for example, Keller v. Hungary (dec.), no. 33352/02, 4 April 2006; and Kwiecien v. Poland, no. 51744/99, § 56, ECHR 2007-I).
  • EGMR, 23.08.2011 - 49910/06

    KOVAC v. CROATIA

    Furthermore, in assessing the proportionality of the interference, the nature and the severity of the sanction imposed are also factors to be taken into account (see, for example, Keller v. Hungary (dec.), no. 33352/02, 4 April 2006, and Kwiecien v. Poland, no. 51744/99, § 56, ECHR 2007-I).
  • EGMR, 21.10.2008 - 20953/06

    WOLEK, KASPROW AND LESKI v. POLAND

    They carried out a careful balancing exercise between the interests involved (compare and contrast Keller v. Hungary (dec.), no. 33352/02, 4 April 2006 and Kwiecien v. Poland, no. 51744/99, §..., ECHR 2007-...).
  • EGMR, 08.07.2008 - 57659/00

    KITA v. POLAND

  • EGMR, 03.11.2015 - 57675/10

    BESTRY v. POLAND

  • EGMR, 03.11.2015 - 48053/11

    STANKIEWICZ AND OTHERS v. POLAND (No. 2)

  • EGMR, 03.06.2014 - 52517/13

    SCHUMAN v. POLAND

  • EGMR, 06.12.2007 - 73219/01

    FILATENKO v. RUSSIA

  • EGMR, 02.10.2018 - 7972/09

    FEDCHENKO v. RUSSIA (No. 3)

  • EGMR, 02.10.2018 - 17221/13

    FEDCHENKO v. RUSSIA (No. 4)

  • EGMR, 16.12.2008 - 23510/02

    VITRENKO AND OTHERS v. UKRAINE

Haben Sie eine Ergänzung? Oder haben Sie einen Fehler gefunden? Schreiben Sie uns.
Neu: Die Merklistenfunktion erreichen Sie nun über das Lesezeichen oben.
Sie können auswählen (Maus oder Pfeiltasten):
(Liste aufgrund Ihrer bisherigen Eingabe)
Komplette Übersicht