Rechtsprechung
| EGMR, 04.04.2017 - 38458/15 |
Zitiervorschläge
Tipp: Um den Kurzlink (hier: https://dejure.org/2017,8874) schnell in die Zwischenablage zu kopieren, können Sie die Tastenkombination Alt + R verwenden - auch ohne diesen Bereich zu öffnen.
Volltextveröffentlichung
- Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte
LOVRIC v. CROATIA
Violation of Article 6 - Right to a fair trial (Article 6 - Civil proceedings;Article 6-1 - Access to court) (englisch)
Sonstiges
- Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte (Verfahrensmitteilung)
LOVRIC v. CROATIA
Verfahrensgang
- EGMR, 04.04.2017 - 38458/15
- EGMR, 24.04.2019 - 38458/15
Wird zitiert von ... (0) Neu Zitiert selbst (3)
- EGMR, 14.12.2006 - 1398/03
MARKOVIC ET AUTRES c. ITALIE
Auszug aus EGMR, 04.04.2017 - 38458/15
In my view, the domestic courts" interpretation of domestic law is to be understood as a substantive limitation concerning the right invoked by the applicant before the domestic courts, and not merely as a procedural limitation on the right to institute court proceedings concerning a right recognised in domestic legislation (see, for example, Roche v. the United Kingdom [GC], no. 32555/96, §§ 118-119, ECHR 2005-X, and Markovic and Others v. Italy [GC], no. 1398/03, § 94, ECHR 2006-XIV). - EGMR, 19.10.2005 - 32555/96
ROCHE c. ROYAUME-UNI
Auszug aus EGMR, 04.04.2017 - 38458/15
In my view, the domestic courts" interpretation of domestic law is to be understood as a substantive limitation concerning the right invoked by the applicant before the domestic courts, and not merely as a procedural limitation on the right to institute court proceedings concerning a right recognised in domestic legislation (see, for example, Roche v. the United Kingdom [GC], no. 32555/96, §§ 118-119, ECHR 2005-X, and Markovic and Others v. Italy [GC], no. 1398/03, § 94, ECHR 2006-XIV). - EGMR, 21.02.1975 - 4451/70
GOLDER c. ROYAUME-UNI
Auszug aus EGMR, 04.04.2017 - 38458/15
The right of access, namely the right to institute proceedings before a court in civil matters, constitutes one aspect of this "right to a court" (see, among many other authorities, Osman v. the United Kingdom, 28 October 1998, § 147, Reports 1998-VIII, and Golder v. the United Kingdom, 21 February 1975, §§ 28-36, Series A no. 18).