Rechtsprechung
EGMR, 04.04.2017 - 5294/14 |
Zitiervorschläge
Tipp: Um den Kurzlink (hier: https://dejure.org/2017,14449) schnell in die Zwischenablage zu kopieren, können Sie die Tastenkombination Alt + R verwenden - auch ohne diesen Bereich zu öffnen.
Volltextveröffentlichung
- Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte
ALBERT AND OTHERS v. HUNGARY
Admissible (englisch)
Sonstiges (2)
- Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte (Verfahrensmitteilung)
ALBERT AND OTHERS v. HUNGARY
Protokoll Nr. 1 Art. 1 MRK
[ENG] - Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte (Videoaufzeichnung der mündlichen Verhandlung)
Albert and Others v. Hungary
[18.12.2019]
Verfahrensgang
- EGMR, 04.04.2017 - 5294/14
- EGMR, 29.01.2019 - 5294/14
- EGMR, 07.07.2020 - 5294/14
Wird zitiert von ... (0) Neu Zitiert selbst (4)
- EKMR, 11.12.1986 - 11189/84
SOCIETE S. ET T. c. SUEDE
Auszug aus EGMR, 04.04.2017 - 5294/14
The Court has consistently held that a company share with an economic value can be considered a possession (see, among other authorities, Company S. and T. v. Sweden, no. 11189/84, Commission decision of 11 December 1986, DR 50, p. 138; Reisner v. Turkey, no. 46815/09, § 45, 21 July 2015; Olczak v. Poland (dec.), no. 30417/96, § 60, 7 November 2002; Marini v. Albania, no. 3738/02, § 165, 18 December 2007 and Sovtransavto Holding v. Ukraine, no. 48553/99, § 91, ECHR 2002-VII). - EGMR, 27.06.2000 - 35178/97
ANKARCRONA c. SUEDE
Auszug aus EGMR, 04.04.2017 - 5294/14
In certain circumstances the sole owner of a company can claim to be a "victim" within the meaning of Article 34 of the Convention in so far as the impugned measures taken with regard to his or her company are concerned (see, among other authorities, Ankarcrona v. Sweden (dec.), no. 35178/97, 27 June 2000, and Glas Nadezhda EOOD and Anatoliy Elenkov v. Bulgaria, no. 14134/02, § 40, ECHR 2007). - EGMR, 15.07.1982 - 8130/78
Eckle ./. Deutschland
Auszug aus EGMR, 04.04.2017 - 5294/14
The Court reiterates that the term "victim" used in Article 34 of the Convention denotes the person directly affected by the act or omission at issue (see, among other authorities, Eckle v. Germany, 15 July 1982, § 66, Series A no. 51, and Vatan v. Russia, no. 47978/99, § 48, 7 October 2004). - EGMR, 21.07.2015 - 46815/09
REISNER v. TURKEY
Auszug aus EGMR, 04.04.2017 - 5294/14
The Court has consistently held that a company share with an economic value can be considered a possession (see, among other authorities, Company S. and T. v. Sweden, no. 11189/84, Commission decision of 11 December 1986, DR 50, p. 138; Reisner v. Turkey, no. 46815/09, § 45, 21 July 2015; Olczak v. Poland (dec.), no. 30417/96, § 60, 7 November 2002; Marini v. Albania, no. 3738/02, § 165, 18 December 2007 and Sovtransavto Holding v. Ukraine, no. 48553/99, § 91, ECHR 2002-VII).