Rechtsprechung
| EGMR, 04.04.2019 - 8981/14 |
Zitiervorschläge
Tipp: Um den Kurzlink (hier: https://dejure.org/2019,7617) schnell in die Zwischenablage zu kopieren, können Sie die Tastenkombination Alt + R verwenden - auch ohne diesen Bereich zu öffnen.
Volltextveröffentlichung
- Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte
KUNERT v. POLAND
No violation of Article 6 - Right to a fair trial (Article 6 - Civil proceedings;Article 6-1 - Access to court) (englisch)
Wird zitiert von ... Neu Zitiert selbst (2)
- EGMR, 12.11.2002 - 46129/99
ZVOLSKÝ AND ZVOLSKÁ v. THE CZECH REPUBLIC
Auszug aus EGMR, 04.04.2019 - 8981/14
That being so, the rules in question, or their application, should not prevent litigants from using an available remedy (see Zvolský and Zvolská v. the Czech Republic, no. 46129/99, § 51, ECHR 2002-IX). - EGMR, 19.06.2001 - 28249/95
KREUZ c. POLOGNE
Auszug aus EGMR, 04.04.2019 - 8981/14
In this way, that provision embodies the "right to a court", of which the right of access, that is the right to institute proceedings before a court in civil matters, constitutes one aspect only; however, it is an aspect that makes it in fact possible to benefit from the further guarantees laid down in paragraph 1 of Article 6 (see Kreuz v. Poland, no. 28249/95, § 52, ECHR 2001-VI).
- EGMR, 08.09.2020 - 51127/18
STEFANOV v. BULGARIA
17153/11 and 29 others, §§ 72 and 80, 25 March 2014; Papaioannou v. Cyprus (dec.), no. 15619/12, §§ 28-30, 15 September 2015; and Kunert v. Poland, no. 8981/14, §§ 42-43, 4 April 2019), such as a failure to meet a time-limit (see, for example, Ben Salah Adraqui and Dhaime v. Spain (dec.), no. 45023/98, ECHR 2000-IV; Alinak v. Turkey (dec.), no. 30514/96, 17 October 2000; and Peru?. v. Slovenia, no. 35016/05, § 47, 27 September 2012).