Rechtsprechung
EGMR, 04.05.2001 - 28883/95 |
Volltextveröffentlichungen (3)
- Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte
McKERR c. ROYAUME-UNI
Art. 2, Art. 2 Abs. 1, Art. 2 Abs. 2, Art. 13, Art. 14, Art. 36, Art. 36 Abs. 2, Art. 41 MRK
Violation de l'art. 2 Non-violation de l'art. 14 Non-violation de l'art. 13 Préjudice moral - réparation pécuniaire Remboursement partiel frais et dépens - procédure de la Convention ... - Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte
McKERR v. THE UNITED KINGDOM
Art. 2, Art. 2 Abs. 1, Art. 2 Abs. 2, Art. 13, Art. 14, Art. 36, Art. 36 Abs. 2, Art. 41 MRK
Violation of Art. 2 No violation of Art. 14 No violation of Art. 13 Non-pecuniary damage - financial award Costs and expenses partial award - Convention proceedings ... - juris(Abodienst) (Volltext/Leitsatz)
Verfahrensgang
- EGMR, 04.04.2000 - 28883/95
- EGMR, 04.05.2001 - 28883/95
- EGMR, 03.12.2020 - 28883/95
Wird zitiert von ... (284) Neu Zitiert selbst (7)
- EGMR, 11.01.2000 - 24520/94
CARAHER contre le ROYAUME-UNI
Auszug aus EGMR, 04.05.2001 - 28883/95
These civil proceedings are wholly independent of any criminal investigation and their efficacy has not been shown to rely on the proper conduct of criminal investigations or prosecutions (see, for example, Caraher v. the United Kingdom (dec.), no. 24520/94, ECHR 2000-I). - EGMR, 20.05.1999 - 21594/93
Verursachung des Todes eines türkischen Staatsangehörigen durch türkische …
Auszug aus EGMR, 04.05.2001 - 28883/95
For an investigation into alleged unlawful killing by State agents to be effective, it may generally be regarded as necessary for the persons responsible for and carrying out the investigation to be independent from those implicated in the events (see, for example, Güleç v. Turkey, judgment of 27 July 1998, Reports 1998-IV, p. 1733, §§ 81-82, and OÄ?ur v. Turkey [GC], no. 21594/93, §§ 91-92, ECHR 1999-III). - EGMR, 08.07.1999 - 23763/94
TANRIKULU c. TURQUIE
Auszug aus EGMR, 04.05.2001 - 28883/95
The authorities must take whatever reasonable steps they can to secure the evidence concerning the incident, including, inter alia, eyewitness testimony, forensic evidence and, where appropriate, an autopsy which provides a complete and accurate record of injury and an objective analysis of clinical findings, including the cause of death (see, concerning autopsies, for example, Salman, cited above, § 106; concerning witnesses, for example, Tanrıkulu v. Turkey [GC], no. 23763/94, § 109, ECHR 1999-IV; and concerning forensic evidence, for example, Gül v. Turkey, no. 22676/93, § 89, 14 December 2000, unreported).
- EGMR, 28.03.2000 - 22535/93
MAHMUT KAYA v. TURKEY
Auszug aus EGMR, 04.05.2001 - 28883/95
A requirement of promptness and reasonable expedition is implicit in this context (see Yasa v. Turkey, judgment of 2 September 1998, Reports 1998-VI, pp. 2439-40, §§ 102-04; Çakıcı, cited above, §§ 80, 87 and 106; Tanrıkulu, cited above, § 109; and Mahmut Kaya v. Turkey, no. 22535/93, §§ 106-07, ECHR 2000-III). - EGMR, 13.06.2000 - 23531/94
TIMURTAS c. TURQUIE
Auszug aus EGMR, 04.05.2001 - 28883/95
Indeed, the burden of proof may be regarded as resting on the authorities to provide a satisfactory and convincing explanation (see Salman v. Turkey [GC], no. 21986/93, § 100, ECHR 2000-VII; and also Çakıcı v. Turkey [GC], no. 23657/94, § 85, ECHR 1999-IV; Ertak v. Turkey, no. 20764/92, § 32, ECHR 2000-V; and Timurtas v. Turkey, no. 23531/94, § 82, ECHR 2000-VI). - EGMR, 14.12.2000 - 22676/93
GÜL v. TURKEY
Auszug aus EGMR, 04.05.2001 - 28883/95
The authorities must take whatever reasonable steps they can to secure the evidence concerning the incident, including, inter alia, eyewitness testimony, forensic evidence and, where appropriate, an autopsy which provides a complete and accurate record of injury and an objective analysis of clinical findings, including the cause of death (see, concerning autopsies, for example, Salman, cited above, § 106; concerning witnesses, for example, Tanrıkulu v. Turkey [GC], no. 23763/94, § 109, ECHR 1999-IV; and concerning forensic evidence, for example, Gül v. Turkey, no. 22676/93, § 89, 14 December 2000, unreported). - EGMR, 27.09.1995 - 18984/91
McCANN AND OTHERS v. THE UNITED KINGDOM
Auszug aus EGMR, 04.05.2001 - 28883/95
The object and purpose of the Convention as an instrument for the protection of individual human beings also requires that Article 2 be interpreted and applied so as to make its safeguards practical and effective (see McCann and Others v. the United Kingdom, judgment of 27 September 1995, Series A no. 324, pp. 45-46, §§ 146-47).
- EGMR, 07.07.2011 - 55721/07
Britische Soldaten sollen Kriegsverbrechen begangen haben
Le rôle joué par la hiérarchie militaire dans la notification à la section spéciale d'investigation d'un incident appelant une enquête et, ultérieurement, dans le renvoi devant l'Autorité de poursuite de l'armée des affaires examinées par ladite section, n'autoriserait pas à conclure que ces enquêtes ne présentaient pas l'indépendance requise par les articles 2 ou 3 (Cooper c. Royaume-Uni [GC], no 48843/99, §§ 108-115, CEDH 2003-XII ; McKerr c. Royaume-Uni, no 28883/95, CEDH 2001-III, et Paul et Audrey Edwards c. Royaume-Uni, no 46477/99, CEDH 2002-II). - EGMR, 28.09.2015 - 23380/09
BOUYID v. BELGIUM
The Court also pointed out in the El-Masri judgment (cited above, § 155) that although it recognised that it must be cautious in taking on the role of a first-instance tribunal of fact where this was not made unavoidable by the circumstances of a particular case (see McKerr v. the United Kingdom (dec.), no. 28883/95, 4 April 2000), it had to apply a "particularly thorough scrutiny" where allegations were made under Article 3 of the Convention (see, mutatis mutandis, Ribitsch v. Austria, 4 December 1995, § 32, Series A no. 336; and Georgiy Bykov v. Russia, no. 24271/03, § 51, 14 October 2010), even if certain domestic proceedings and investigations had already taken place (see Cobzaru v. Romania, no. 48254/99, § 65, 26 July 2007).As the Court has emphasised on previous occasions, although there may be obstacles or difficulties which prevent progress in an investigation in a particular situation, a prompt response by the authorities in investigating allegations of ill-treatment may generally be regarded as essential in maintaining public confidence in their adherence to the rule of law and in preventing any appearance of collusion in or tolerance of unlawful acts (see, among other authorities, McKerr v. the United Kingdom, no. 28883/95, § 114, ECHR 2001-III; and Mocanu and Others, cited above, § 323).
- EGMR, 20.12.2004 - 50385/99
MAKARATZIS c. GRECE
The remedy required by Article 13 must be "effective" in practice as well as in law, in particular in the sense that its exercise must not be unjustifiably hindered by the acts or omissions of the authorities of the respondent State (see Kaya v. Turkey, judgment of 19 February 1998, Reports 1998-I, pp. 329-30, § 106; Paul and Audrey Edwards v. the United Kingdom, no. 46477/99, § 96, ECHR 2002-II; Gül v. Turkey, no. 22676/93, § 100, 14 December 2000; Ä°lhan, cited above; and McKerr v. the United Kingdom, no. 28883/95, § 107, ECHR 2001-III).
- EGMR, 14.09.2010 - 2668/07
DINK c. TURQUIE
Dans tous les cas, toutefois, les proches de la victime doivent être associés à la procédure dans la mesure nécessaire à la sauvegarde des intérêts légitimes de la victime (voir, par exemple, McKerr c. Royaume-Uni, no 28883/95, § 148, CEDH 2001-III). - EGMR, 30.03.2016 - 5878/08
ARMANI DA SILVA c. ROYAUME-UNI
However, disclosure or publication of police reports and investigative materials may involve sensitive issues with possible prejudicial effects on private individuals or other investigations and, therefore, cannot be regarded as an automatic requirement under Article 2. The requisite access of the public or the victim's relatives may therefore be provided for in other stages of the procedure (see, among other authorities, McKerr v. the United Kingdom, no. 28883/95, § 129, ECHR 2001-III and Giuliani and Gaggio, cited above, § 304). - EGMR, 25.06.2019 - 41720/13
NICOLAE VIRGILIU TANASE c. ROUMANIE
As with Article 3 of the Convention as stated in paragraph 115 above, once such a matter has come to the attention of the authorities, this imposes on the State ipso facto an obligation under Article 2 to carry out an effective investigation (see, mutatis mutandis, Ergi v. Turkey, 28 July 1998, § 82, Reports 1998-IV, and McKerr v. the United Kingdom, no. 28883/95, § 111, ECHR 2001-III). - EGMR, 01.07.2014 - 77938/11
DIMITROV AND OTHERS v. BULGARIA
It is sensitive to the subsidiary nature of its role and recognises that it must be cautious in taking on the role of a fact-finding tribunal where this is not rendered unavoidable by the circumstances of a particular case (ibid., citing Golubeva v. Russia, no. 1062/03, § 95, 17 December 2009, and McKerr v. the United Kingdom (dec.), no. 28883/95, 4 April 2000).In those circumstances, it is difficult to accept that that inquiry was attended by a sufficient degree of public scrutiny and involved the next-of-kin of the deceased victim to the extent necessary to safeguard their legitimate interests, as required under Articles 2 and 3 of the Convention (see McKerr v. the United Kingdom, no. 28883/95, § 115, ECHR 2001-III, and El-Masri, cited above, § 184).
The facts of the present case are in no way to be compared with those in the cases cited in the judgment as relevant authorities (namely Al-Skeini and Others v. the United Kingdom [GC], no. 55721/07, ECHR 2011 - which concerned the alleged killing of Iraqi nationals by members of the British armed forces in Iraq; McKerr v. the United Kingdom, no. 28883/95, ECHR 2001-III - where the police killed three suspected terrorists by firing over 100 rounds into the car in which the latter were travelling; and Avsar v. Turkey, no. 25657/94, ECHR 2001-VII - where the applicant's brother was abducted and murdered by village guards).
- EGMR, 14.11.2023 - 1049/17
NIKA v. ALBANIA
However, disclosure or publication of police reports and investigative material may involve sensitive issues with possible prejudicial effects on private individuals or other investigations and therefore cannot be regarded as an automatic requirement under Article 2. The requisite access of the public or the victim's relatives may therefore be provided for in other stages of the procedure (see, among other authorities, McKerr v. the United Kingdom, no. 28883/95, § 129, ECHR 2001-III, and Giuliani and Gaggio, cited above, § 304).The Court must also be cautious in taking on the role of a first-instance tribunal of fact, where this is not rendered unavoidable by the circumstances of a particular case (see, for example, McKerr v. the United Kingdom (dec.), no. 28883/95, 4 April 2000).
- EGMR, 18.06.2002 - 25656/94
ORHAN v. TURKEY
The Court is sensitive to the subsidiary nature of its role and recognises that it must be cautious in taking on the role of a first instance tribunal of fact, where this is not rendered unavoidable by the circumstances of a particular case (see, for example, McKerr v. the United Kingdom (dec.), no. 28883/95, 4 April 2000).However, a prompt response by the authorities in investigating a use of lethal force or disappearance may generally be regarded as essential in maintaining public confidence in their maintenance of the rule of law and in preventing any appearance of collusion in or tolerance of unlawful acts (see, in general, McKerr v. the United Kingdom, no. 28883/95, §§ 108-115, ECHR 2001-III and Avsar v. Turkey, cited above, §§ 390-395).
- EGMR, 24.03.2011 - 23458/02
Tod eines Demonstranten beim G-8-Gipfel in Genua
However, disclosure or publication of police reports and investigative materials may involve sensitive issues with possible prejudicial effects to private individuals or other investigations and, therefore, cannot be regarded as an automatic requirement under Article 2. The requisite access of the public or the victim's relatives may therefore be provided for in other stages of the procedure (see, among other authorities, McKerr v. the United Kingdom, no. 28883/95, § 129, ECHR 2001-III). - EGMR, 30.01.2024 - 53050/21
ZLATANOV v. BULGARIA
- EGMR, 14.03.2002 - 46477/99
PAUL ET AUDREY EDWARDS c. ROYAUME-UNI
- EGMR, 24.02.2005 - 57947/00
ISSAIEVA, YOUSSOUPOVA ET BAZAÏEVA c. RUSSIE
- EGMR, 15.05.2007 - 52391/99
RAMSAHAI ET AUTRES c. PAYS-BAS
- EGMR, 20.12.2007 - 7888/03
NIKOLOVA AND VELICHKOVA v. BULGARIA
- EGMR, 21.01.2016 - 71545/12
L.E. c. GRÈCE
- EGMR, 27.07.2006 - 69481/01
BAZORKINA v. RUSSIA
- EGMR, 24.02.2005 - 57950/00
ISAYEVA v. RUSSIA
- EGMR, 24.02.2005 - 57942/00
KHASHIYEV AND AKAYEVA v. RUSSIA
- EGMR, 17.09.2014 - 10865/09
MOCANU ET AUTRES c. ROUMANIE
- EGMR, 25.06.2020 - 60561/14
S.M. c. CROATIE
- EGMR, 18.09.2009 - 16064/90
VARNAVA ET AUTRES c. TURQUIE
- EGMR, 09.07.2019 - 8351/17
ROMEO CASTAÑO c. BELGIQUE
- EGMR, 02.10.2007 - 39541/98
DÖLEK c. TURQUIE
- EGMR, 13.06.2002 - 38361/97
ANGUELOVA v. BULGARIA
- EGMR, 29.01.2019 - 36925/07
GÜZELYURTLU AND OTHERS v. CYPRUS AND TURKEY
- EGMR, 25.01.2022 - 28864/18
GRIBBEN v. THE UNITED KINGDOM
- EGMR, 16.06.2015 - 13216/05
CHIRAGOV ET AUTRES c. ARMÉNIE
- EGMR, 08.11.2005 - 34056/02
GONGADZE c. UKRAINE
- EGMR, 02.08.2005 - 65899/01
TANIS ET AUTRES c. TURQUIE
- EGMR, 26.07.2005 - 35072/97
SIMSEK AND OTHERS v. TURKEY
- EGMR, 05.04.2005 - 54825/00
NEVMERZHITSKY v. UKRAINE
- EGMR, 30.06.2020 - 23405/16
S.F. c. SUISSE
- EGMR, 07.06.2011 - 42344/07
PREDICA v. ROMANIA
- EGMR, 17.10.2006 - 52067/99
OKKALI c. TURQUIE
- EGMR, 03.05.2012 - 49379/09
SHAFIYEVA v. RUSSIA
- EGMR, 27.07.2004 - 57671/00
SLIMANI v. FRANCE
- EGMR, 18.11.2014 - 22412/08
EMARS v. LATVIA
- EGMR, 07.02.2019 - 20444/14
PATSAKI ET AUTRES c. GRÈCE
- EGMR, 02.09.2010 - 71420/01
BEKIRSKI v. BULGARIA
- EGMR, 09.11.2006 - 7615/02
IMAKAÏEVA c. RUSSIE
- EGMR, 19.10.2006 - 56154/00
YILDIRIM AND OTHERS v. TURKEY
- EGMR, 22.11.2005 - 38595/97
KAKOULLI v. TURKEY
- EGMR, 29.07.2004 - 35875/97
SIRIN YILMAZ v. TURKEY
- EGMR, 27.07.2004 - 34592/97
AGDAS v. TURKEY
- EGMR, 20.04.2004 - 28298/95
BULDAN v. TURKEY
- EGMR, 10.07.2001 - 25657/94
AVSAR c. TURQUIE
- EGMR, 22.09.2015 - 41437/10
ABDURAKHMANOVA AND ABDULGAMIDOVA v. RUSSIA
- EGMR, 16.07.2013 - 58559/09
HEMSWORTH v. THE UNITED KINGDOM
- EGMR, 04.12.2012 - 24867/04
FILIPOVI v. BULGARIA
- EGMR, 29.03.2011 - 47357/08
ALIKAJ ET AUTRES c. ITALIE
- EGMR, 08.06.2010 - 6458/03
WOLF-SORG c. TURQUIE
- EGMR, 24.09.2013 - 74010/11
DEMBELE c. SUISSE
- EGMR, 18.04.2013 - 54765/09
ASKHABOVA v. RUSSIA
- EGMR, 15.11.2007 - 6846/02
KHAMILA ISAYEVA v. RUSSIA
- EGMR, 15.02.2007 - 57049/00
YÜKSEL ERDOGAN AND OTHERS v. TURKEY
- EGMR, 18.12.2012 - 2944/06
ASLAKHANOVA AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA
- EGMR, 12.06.2012 - 2546/08
UMAROVY v. RUSSIA
- EGMR, 24.05.2011 - 33810/07
ASSOCIATION
- EGMR, 19.07.2011 - 52442/09
DURDEVIC v. CROATIA
- EGMR, 01.12.2009 - 43134/05
G.N. u.a. ./. Italien
- EGMR, 14.04.2015 - 24014/05
MUSTAFA TUNÇ ET FECIRE TUNÇ c. TURQUIE
- EGMR, 16.11.2017 - 72126/14
CEESAY v. AUSTRIA
- EGMR, 13.11.2012 - 10865/09
MOCANU AND OTHERS v. ROMANIA
- EGMR, 17.07.2018 - 15086/07
Mord an Journalistin: Russland wegen Politkowskaja-Ermittlungen verurteilt
- EGMR, 12.06.2014 - 57856/11
JELIC v. CROATIA
- EGMR, 06.04.2004 - 21689/93
AHMET ÖZKAN AND OTHERS v. TURKEY
- EGMR, 02.10.2012 - 14743/11
ABDULKHAKOV v. RUSSIA
- EGMR, 26.07.2007 - 55523/00
ANGELOVA AND ILIEV v. BULGARIA
- EGMR, 08.12.2005 - 32444/96
KANLIBAS c. TURQUIE
- EGMR, 23.06.2020 - 2429/13
SARI c. TURQUIE
- EGMR, 14.11.2019 - 25244/18
N.A. v. FINLAND
- EGMR, 11.02.2016 - 67360/11
HUSEYNLI AND OTHERS v. AZERBAIJAN
- EGMR, 26.05.2015 - 25595/08
SONGÜL INCE ET AUTRES c. TURQUIE
- EGMR, 31.07.2014 - 1774/11
NEMTSOV v. RUSSIA
- EGMR, 14.12.2010 - 74832/01
MIZIGÁROVÁ v. SLOVAKIA
- EGMR, 05.11.2009 - 1108/02
KOLEVI v. BULGARIA
- EGMR, 15.01.2009 - 46598/06
BRANKO TOMASIC AND OTHERS v. CROATIA
- EGMR, 09.05.2006 - 60255/00
PEREIRA HENRIQUES c. LUXEMBOURG
- EGMR, 05.07.2005 - 49790/99
TRUBNIKOV v. RUSSIA
- EGMR, 31.05.2005 - 25165/94
AKDENIZ v. TURKEY
- EGMR, 01.07.2003 - 29178/95
FINUCANE v. THE UNITED KINGDOM
- EGMR, 17.10.2023 - 67351/13
HOVHANNISYAN AND KARAPETYAN v. ARMENIA
- EGMR, 30.08.2016 - 49037/15
Thomas Karremans
- EGMR, 23.02.2016 - 29272/08
ÖZEN ET AUTRES c. TURQUIE
- EGMR, 15.12.2015 - 56080/13
LOPES DE SOUSA FERNANDES c. PORTUGAL
- EGMR, 23.10.2012 - 24604/04
NIHAYET ARICI ET AUTRES c. TURQUIE
- EGMR, 07.07.2009 - 58447/00
ZAVOLOKA c. LETTONIE
- EGMR, 20.06.2006 - 45900/99
YASAROGLU c. TURQUIE
- EGMR, 05.09.2019 - 20147/15
OLEWNIK-CIEPLINSKA AND OLEWNIK v. POLAND
- EGMR, 03.05.2016 - 12938/07
CERF v. TURKEY
- EGMR, 17.11.2015 - 611/12
SEFER YILMAZ ET MERYEM YILMAZ c. TURQUIE
- EGMR, 13.11.2012 - 7678/09
VAN COLLE v. THE UNITED KINGDOM
- EGMR, 20.05.2010 - 12336/03
PERISAN ET AUTRES c. TURQUIE
- EGMR, 27.11.2007 - 32457/04
BRECKNELL v. THE UNITED KINGDOM
- EGMR, 02.11.2006 - 43393/98
MATKO v. SLOVENIA
- EGMR, 04.07.2023 - 4904/20
AL c. TÜRKIYE
- EGMR, 07.06.2022 - 44592/16
BOBOC AND OTHERS v. THE REPUBLIC OF MOLDOVA
- EGMR, 27.10.2015 - 23551/10
ÖZPOLAT ET AUTRES c. TURQUIE
- EGMR, 15.07.2014 - 40485/08
PETROVIC v. SERBIA
- EGMR, 17.04.2014 - 68780/10
GUERDNER ET AUTRES c. FRANCE
- EGMR, 12.07.2011 - 17380/09
PAPAPETROU ET AUTRES c. GRECE
- EGMR, 22.03.2005 - 28290/95
GÜNGÖR c. TURQUIE
- EGMR, 26.02.2004 - 43577/98
NACHOVA AND OTHERS v. BULGARIA
- EGMR, 24.04.2014 - 39583/05
PEREVEDENTSEVY v. RUSSIA
- EGMR, 26.03.2013 - 10425/09
ACATRINEI ET AUTRES c. ROUMANIE
- EGMR, 23.10.2012 - 43606/04
YOTOVA c. BULGARIE
- EGMR, 17.01.2012 - 12294/07
ZONTUL c. GRECE
- EGMR, 23.09.2010 - 17185/05
ISKANDAROV v. RUSSIA
- EGMR, 16.02.2010 - 32146/05
EUGENIA LAZAR c. ROUMANIE
- EGMR, 25.08.2009 - 23458/02
GIULIANI ET GAGGIO c. ITALIE
- EGMR, 02.04.2009 - 22684/05
MURADOVA v. AZERBAIJAN
- EGMR, 06.02.2007 - 23458/02
GIULIANI c. ITALIE
- EGMR, 21.12.2006 - 35962/97
GÖMI ET AUTRES c. TURQUIE
- EGMR, 06.07.2006 - 53489/99
KAVAK c. TURQUIE
- EGMR, 24.05.2005 - 36088/97
ACAR AND OTHERS v. TURKEY
- EGMR, 31.03.2005 - 38187/97
ADALI v. TURKEY
- EGMR, 08.04.2004 - 26307/95
TAHSIN ACAR c. TURQUIE
- EGMR, 25.06.2013 - 24014/05
MUSTAFA TUNÇ ET FECIRE TUNÇ c. TURQUIE
- EGMR, 05.07.2011 - 34085/06
VELKHIYEV AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA
- EGMR, 19.09.2006 - 45784/99
SULTAN KARABULUT c. TURQUIE
- EGMR, 19.01.2023 - 32245/19
MACHALIKASHVILI AND OTHERS v. GEORGIA
- EGMR, 08.11.2022 - 2169/12
HOVHANNISYAN AND NAZARYAN v. ARMENIA
- EGMR, 11.04.2019 - 38089/12
SARWARI ET AUTRES c. GRÈCE
- EGMR, 25.01.2018 - 33349/10
SIDIROPOULOS ET PAPAKOSTAS c. GRÈCE
- EGMR, 01.06.2017 - 56717/08
AYVAZYAN v. ARMENIA
- EGMR, 05.11.2015 - 35589/08
NAGMETOV v. RUSSIA
- EGMR, 27.01.2015 - 56838/08
ALECU ET AUTRES c. ROUMANIE
- EGMR, 25.03.2014 - 54153/08
LARIE ET AUTRES c. ROUMANIE
- EGMR, 30.10.2012 - 32520/09
GHIMP AND OTHERS v. THE REPUBLIC OF MOLDOVA
- EGMR, 17.04.2012 - 31805/06
RIZVANOV v. AZERBAIJAN
- EGMR, 20.12.2011 - 5952/07
MASNEVA v. UKRAINE
- EGMR, 25.01.2011 - 26246/05
IORGA ET AUTRES c. ROUMANIE
- EGMR, 17.12.2009 - 4762/05
MIKAYIL MAMMADOV v. AZERBAIJAN
- EGMR, 08.01.2009 - 43326/05
LEONIDIS v. GREECE
- EGMR, 21.10.2008 - 51210/99
NEHYET GÜNAY ET AUTRES c. TURQUIE
- EGMR, 30.06.2020 - 23524/14
MÎTU v. THE REPUBLIC OF MOLDOVA
- EGMR, 01.03.2018 - 49582/14
CHATZISTAVROU c. GRÈCE
- EGMR, 09.01.2018 - 3534/06
INCIN v. TURKEY
- EGMR, 23.11.2017 - 10633/15
TADIC v. CROATIA
- EGMR, 01.12.2015 - 26589/06
SAKINE EPÖZDEMIR AND OTHERS v. TURKEY
- EGMR, 03.11.2015 - 99/12
OLSZEWSCY v. POLAND
- EGMR, 03.11.2015 - 8494/07
POLAT c. TURQUIE
- EGMR, 23.04.2015 - 36367/09
KAGIROV c. RUSSIE
- EGMR, 03.09.2013 - 15762/10
CADIROGLU v. TURKEY
- EGMR, 16.07.2013 - 34783/07
ABIK c. TURQUIE
- EGMR, 13.06.2013 - 24402/07
VASYLCHUK v. UKRAINE
- EGMR, 18.04.2013 - 67474/11
AZIMOV v. RUSSIA
- EGMR, 22.01.2013 - 31963/08
MITIC v. SERBIA
- EGMR, 22.01.2013 - 32501/11
SULEYMANOV v. RUSSIA
- EGMR, 17.01.2013 - 38906/07
KARABET AND OTHERS v. UKRAINE
- EGMR, 06.11.2012 - 30086/05
DIMOV AND OTHERS v. BULGARIA
- EGMR, 30.10.2012 - 43994/05
E.M. c. ROUMANIE
- EGMR, 14.02.2012 - 9296/06
SHUMKOVA v. RUSSIA
- EGMR, 08.11.2011 - 3064/07
PAÇACI ET AUTRES c. TURQUIE
- EGMR, 15.02.2011 - 4704/04
PALIC v. BOSNIA AND HERZEGOVINA
- EGMR, 09.11.2010 - 22746/03
ÖLMEZ ET AUTRES c. TURQUIE
- EGMR, 19.10.2010 - 71572/01
BAZJAKS v. LATVIA
- EGMR, 03.11.2009 - 23693/03
BOJOLYAN v. ARMENIA
- EGMR, 29.09.2009 - 18324/04
GALEV & OTHERS v. BULGARIA
- EGMR, 28.07.2009 - 30754/04
DVORACEK AND DVORACKOVA v. SLOVAKIA
- EGMR, 24.03.2009 - 11818/02
MOJSIEJEW v. POLAND
- EGMR, 24.01.2008 - 48804/99
OSMANOGLU c. TURQUIE
- EGMR, 04.10.2007 - 58643/00
GONCHARUK v. RUSSIA
- EGMR, 21.06.2007 - 5048/02
MACOVEI ET AUTRES c. ROUMANIE
- EGMR, 21.06.2007 - 57953/00
BITIYEVA AND X v. RUSSIA
- EGMR, 27.06.2006 - 41964/98
CENNET AYHAN AND MEHMET SALIH AYHAN v. TURKEY
- EGMR, 11.10.2005 - 70820/01
STERN c. FRANCE
- EGMR, 31.05.2005 - 27305/95
KOKU v. TURKEY
- EGMR, 13.01.2005 - 34491/97
CEYHAN DEMIR ET AUTRES c. TURQUIE
- EGMR, 10.03.2020 - 58558/13
WARESIAK c. POLOGNE
- EGMR, 10.12.2019 - 11703/07
KAFES c. TURQUIE
- EGMR, 11.12.2018 - 655/16
LAKATOSOVÁ AND LAKATOS v. SLOVAKIA
- EGMR, 04.05.2017 - 47095/09
MUSTAFAYEV v. AZERBAIJAN
- EGMR, 23.06.2016 - 30760/06
KULYK v. UKRAINE
- EGMR, 29.03.2016 - 60304/09
DEMIR c. TURQUIE
- EGMR, 04.02.2016 - 81553/12
HILAL MAMMADOV v. AZERBAIJAN
- EGMR, 07.05.2015 - 59135/09
EMIN HUSEYNOV v. AZERBAIJAN
- EGMR, 27.01.2015 - 29414/09
CIORCAN AND OTHERS v. ROMANIA
- EGMR, 06.01.2015 - 22261/10
CEYLAN c. TURQUIE
- EGMR, 04.09.2014 - 40514/06
RUDYAK v. UKRAINE
- EGMR, 10.04.2014 - 22062/07
LAYIJOV v. AZERBAIJAN
- EGMR, 03.04.2014 - 24439/06
DZHULAY v. UKRAINE
- EGMR, 12.02.2013 - 17008/07
EDUARD POPA v. THE REPUBLIC OF MOLDOVA
- EGMR, 30.10.2012 - 25783/03
ANDRESAN v. ROMANIA
- EGMR, 02.10.2012 - 2594/07
NAJAFLI v. AZERBAIJAN
- EGMR, 24.04.2012 - 12442/04
CRAINICEANU ET FRUMUSANU c. ROUMANIE
- EGMR, 17.04.2012 - 27365/07
ESTAMIROVA v. RUSSIA
- EGMR, 10.04.2012 - 34320/04
HAKOBYAN AND OTHERS v. ARMENIA
- EGMR, 03.04.2012 - 59623/08
EMIN AND OTHERS v. CYPRUS AND OTHER APPLICATIONS
- EGMR, 03.04.2012 - 46744/07
CHARALAMBOUS AND OTHERS v. TURKEY
- EGMR, 23.02.2012 - 30671/04
KLISHYN v. UKRAINE
- EGMR, 17.05.2011 - 33062/03
AZGIN c. TURQUIE
- EGMR, 20.01.2011 - 16212/08
SKENDZIC AND KRZNARIC v. CROATIA
- EGMR, 18.11.2010 - 310/04
SEIDOVA ET AUTRES c. BULGARIE
- EGMR, 10.12.2009 - 17985/04
DUDNYK v. UKRAINE
- EGMR, 13.11.2008 - 249/03
MURAVSKAYA v. UKRAINE
- EGMR, 15.01.2008 - 12458/03
SUAT ÜNLÜ c. TURQUIE
- EGMR, 05.07.2007 - 21449/04
CELNIKU c. GRECE
- EGMR, 02.05.2006 - 54182/00
HALIT CELEBI c. TURQUIE
- EGMR, 31.05.2005 - 27306/95
KISMIR v. TURKEY
- EGMR, 19.05.2005 - 28079/04
GREEN v. THE UNITED KINGDOM
- EGMR, 17.03.2005 - 34506/97
TÜRKOGLU v. TURKEY
- EGMR, 26.01.2023 - 60990/14
B.Y. c. GRÈCE
- EGMR, 22.06.2021 - 40165/07
ADZHIGITOVA AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA
- EGMR, 03.10.2019 - 50283/13
FOUNTAS v. GREECE
- EGMR, 29.01.2019 - 8142/15
CODOI c. ROUMANIE
- EGMR, 18.09.2018 - 38759/14
L.G. c. BELGIQUE
- EGMR, 19.06.2018 - 70671/12
VERETCA v. THE REPUBLIC OF MOLDOVA
- EGMR, 10.10.2017 - 65150/14
CHICHUA v. GEORGIA
- EGMR, 16.02.2017 - 18404/07
DOLGANIN v. UKRAINE
- EGMR, 21.06.2016 - 33539/12
MUTAYEVA AND ISMAILOVA v. RUSSIA
- EGMR, 26.01.2016 - 31430/05
PAVLOV v. RUSSIA
- EGMR, 18.06.2015 - 71593/11
B. AND OTHERS v. CROATIA
- EGMR, 02.06.2015 - 27749/09
YESILYURT c. TURQUIE
- EGMR, 07.05.2015 - 29697/08
KHOLODKOV AND KHOLODKOVA v. UKRAINE
- EGMR, 29.01.2015 - 54204/08
UZEYIR JAFAROV v. AZERBAIJAN
- EGMR, 06.01.2015 - 42153/14
KAYIPLAR AND OTHERS v. CYPRUS
- EGMR, 25.11.2014 - 27446/12
CAN AND OTHERS v. TURKEY
- EGMR, 23.09.2014 - 6523/12
CAKICISOY AND OTHERS v. CYPRUS
- EGMR, 30.04.2014 - 13596/05
TIKHONOVA v. RUSSIA
- EGMR, 25.03.2014 - 22635/12
PAICA c. ROUMANIE
- EGMR, 19.12.2013 - 22490/05
MARINA ALEKSEYEVA v. RUSSIA
- EGMR, 03.10.2013 - 47137/07
TAHIROVA v. AZERBAIJAN
- EGMR, 13.12.2012 - 62120/09
VOLK v. SLOVENIA
- EGMR, 23.10.2012 - 54247/07
GHITA v. ROMANIA
- EGMR, 10.05.2012 - 33498/04
PUTINTSEVA v. RUSSIA
- EGMR, 19.04.2012 - 26984/05
GORGIEV v.
- EGMR, 14.02.2012 - 45383/07
PUKY v. SLOVAKIA
- EGMR, 22.11.2011 - 42078/02
ALDER v. THE UNITED KINGDOM
- EGMR, 30.08.2011 - 36768/09
SARISSKA v. SLOVAKIA
- EGMR, 12.07.2011 - 8258/05
IANOS v. ROMANIA
- EGMR, 21.06.2011 - 43368/04
ISAYEV AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA
- EGMR, 07.06.2011 - 323/04
MECHEVA c. BULGARIE
- EGMR, 10.02.2011 - 33114/03
GENCHEVI c. BULGARIE
- EGMR, 05.10.2010 - 24547/06
EROL c. TURQUIE
- EGMR, 10.06.2010 - 75330/01
SHARKUNOV AND MEZENTSEV v. RUSSIA
- EGMR, 18.02.2010 - 15938/02
MYRONENKO v. UKRAINE
- EGMR, 17.12.2009 - 1062/03
GOLUBEVA v. RUSSIA
- EGMR, 07.04.2009 - 19180/03
NAFIYE ÇETIN AND OTHERS v. TURKEY
- EGMR, 17.02.2009 - 31079/02
BALCI c. TURQUIE
- EGMR, 29.01.2009 - 1750/03
ANDREYEVSKIY v. RUSSIA
- EGMR, 18.12.2008 - 30628/02
UKHAN v. UKRAINE
- EGMR, 06.12.2007 - 75520/01
KOZINETS v. UKRAINE
- EGMR, 26.06.2007 - 29100/03
TIMUR c. TURQUIE
- EGMR, 07.06.2007 - 37938/03
MURILLO ESPINOSA c. ESPAGNE
- EGMR, 06.02.2007 - 29703/05
PETRIE AND OTHERS v. THE UNITED KINGDOM
- EGMR, 20.06.2006 - 45626/99
HAVVA DUDU ESEN c. TURQUIE
- EGMR, 02.03.2006 - 51480/99
ERIKAN BULUT v. TURKEY
- EGMR, 23.02.2006 - 46317/99
OGNYANOVA AND CHOBAN v. BULGARIA
- EGMR, 05.01.2006 - 7961/02
TURK ET AUTRES c. TURQUIE
- EGMR, 22.02.2005 - 31914/03
ROWLEY v. THE UNITED KINGDOM
- EGMR, 10.09.2002 - 45508/99
H.L. v. THE UNITED KINGDOM
- EGMR, 02.09.2021 - 14742/18
RAZNATOVIC v. MONTENEGRO
- EGMR, 11.09.2018 - 29753/16
CHONG AND OTHERS v. THE UNITED KINGDOM
- EGMR, 07.11.2017 - 43629/13
ANAMARIA-LOREDANA ORASANU AND OTHERS v. ROMANIA
- EGMR, 12.10.2017 - 21759/15
TIZIANA PENNINO v. ITALY
- EGMR, 25.08.2015 - 29604/05
KARAÇAY c. TURQUIE
- EGMR, 17.07.2014 - 13406/06
OSAKOVSKIY v. UKRAINE
- EGMR, 03.06.2014 - 60139/09
SENLIK AND TOSUN v. TURKEY
- EGMR, 25.03.2014 - 44301/13
HARRISON AND OTHERS v. THE UNITED KINGDOM
- EGMR, 13.12.2011 - 40957/07
PEARSON v. THE UNITED KINGDOM
- EGMR, 21.07.2011 - 39598/03
KOROBOV v. UKRAINE
- EGMR, 10.06.2010 - 63106/00
VASIL SASHOV PETROV v. BULGARIA
- EGMR, 10.06.2010 - 29972/02
MARINOVA c. BULGARIE
- EGMR, 08.01.2008 - 54169/00
ENZILE ÖZDEMIR v. TURKEY
- EGMR, 26.06.2007 - 39436/98
CANAN c. TURQUIE
- EGMR, 12.06.2007 - 75632/01
EKREM c. TURQUIE
- EGMR, 19.10.2006 - 41335/98
KAMER DEMIR ET AUTRES c. TURQUIE
- EGMR, 19.09.2006 - 32597/96
HALIT DINÇ ET AUTRES c. TURQUIE
- EGMR, 13.06.2006 - 9785/02
ULUMASKAN ET AUTRES c. TURQUIE
- EGMR, 06.10.2005 - 28299/95
NESIBE HARAN v. TURKEY
- EGMR, 10.05.2005 - 34698/04
HACKETT v. THE UNITED KINGDOM
- EGMR, 18.01.2005 - 36217/97
MENTESE AND OTHERS v. TURKEY
- EGMR, 29.04.2003 - 58447/00
ZAVOLOKA contre la LETTONIE
- EGMR, 23.06.2020 - 76635/11
UZHAKHOV AND ALBAGACHIYEVA v. RUSSIA
- EGMR, 15.01.2019 - 66681/12
DEMIROGLU v. TURKEY
- EGMR, 15.01.2019 - 8152/13
ÇANAKÇI v. TURKEY
- EGMR, 24.11.2016 - 42119/12
MUSTAFA HAJILI v. AZERBAIJAN
- EGMR, 05.11.2015 - 78633/12
BUZURTANOVA AND ZARKHMATOVA v. RUSSIA
- EGMR, 29.10.2015 - 20806/10
CHMIL v. UKRAINE
- EGMR, 14.02.2008 - 16437/04
KOBETS v. UKRAINE
- EGMR, 09.05.2006 - 1396/06
McBRIDE c. ROYAUME-UNI
- EGMR, 11.01.2000 - 24520/94