Rechtsprechung
| EGMR, 04.05.2017 - 15485/09 |
Zitiervorschläge
Tipp: Um den Kurzlink (hier: https://dejure.org/2017,13288) schnell in die Zwischenablage zu kopieren, können Sie die Tastenkombination Alt + R verwenden - auch ohne diesen Bereich zu öffnen.
Volltextveröffentlichung
- Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte
CHAP LTD v. ARMENIA
Violation of Article 6+6-3-d - Right to a fair trial (Article 6 - Administrative proceedings;Criminal proceedings) (Article 6 - Right to a fair trial;Administrative proceedings;Criminal proceedings;Article 6-3-d - Examination of witnesses;Obtain attendance of ...
Sonstiges
- Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte (Verfahrensmitteilung)
CHAP LTD v. ARMENIA
Verfahrensgang
- EGMR, 04.05.2017 - 15485/09
- EGMR, 13.11.2019 - 15485/09
Wird zitiert von ... (0) Neu Zitiert selbst (5)
- EGMR, 27.02.2001 - 33354/96
Recht auf Konfrontation und Befragung von Mitangeklagten als Zeugen im Sinne der …
Auszug aus EGMR, 04.05.2017 - 15485/09
The guarantees provided by Article 6 §§ 1 and 3 (d) of the Convention apply to a deposition which may serve to a material degree as the basis for a conviction (see Lucà v. Italy, no. 33354/96, § 41, ECHR 2001-II). - EGMR, 22.04.1992 - 12351/86
VIDAL c. BELGIQUE
Auszug aus EGMR, 04.05.2017 - 15485/09
The Court reiterates in this respect that the term "witness" has an "autonomous" meaning in the Convention system (see Vidal v. Belgium, 22 April 1992, § 33, Series A no. 235-B). - EGMR, 25.07.2013 - 11082/06
Chodorkowski: Moskauer Prozesse sind unfair
Auszug aus EGMR, 04.05.2017 - 15485/09
As a general rule, Article 6 §§ 1 and 3 (d) require that the defendant be given an adequate and proper opportunity to challenge and question a witness against him, either when he makes his statements or at a later stage (see Al-Khawaja and Tahery, cited above, §§ 119-147; Khodorkovskiy and Lebedev v. Russia, nos. 11082/06 and 13772/05, § 707, 25 July 2013 and Schatschaschwili v. Germany [GC], no. 9154/10, §§ 111 - 131, ECHR 2015). - EGMR, 27.09.1990 - 12489/86
Windisch ./. Österreich
Auszug aus EGMR, 04.05.2017 - 15485/09
The Court will therefore consider the applicant's complaint under both provisions taken together (see Windisch v. Austria, 27 September 1990, § 23, Series A no. 186). - EGMR, 09.04.2013 - 40174/08
CECCHETTI v. SAN MARINO
Auszug aus EGMR, 04.05.2017 - 15485/09
In the case of Paykar Yev Haghtanak (see Paykar Yev Haghtanak Ltd v. Armenia, no. 21638/03, 20 December 2007), the Court, referring to the relevant principles established in its case-law on the matter (see Jussila v. Finland [GC], no. 73053/01, §§ 29-38, ECHR 2006-XIV for the analysis of the "Engel criteria" for the assessment of the applicability of the criminal aspect; also Cecchetti v. San Marino (dec.), no. 40174/08, 9 April 2013), found that Article 6 applied under its criminal head to proceedings concerning the imposition of fines and surcharges for unpaid or underpaid profit tax and VAT (ibid., §§ 32-37).