Volltextveröffentlichung

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

  KOMANICKY v. SLOVAKIA

  Art. 6, Art. 6 Abs. 1, Art. 13, Art. 41 MRK
  Violation of Art. 6-1 Not necessary to examine Art. 13 Pecuniary damage - claim dismissed Non-pecuniary damage - financial award Costs and expenses partial award (englisch)

Verfahrensgang

• EGMR, 07.10.1999 - 32106/96
• EGMR, 13.09.2001 - 32106/96
• EGMR, 04.06.2002 - 32106/96

Wird zitiert von ...Neu Zitiert selbst (3)

• EGMR, 27.10.1993 - 14448/88

  DOMBO BEHEER B.V. v. THE NETHERLANDS

  Auszug aus EGMR, 04.06.2002 - 32106/96

  The Court recalls that the principle of equality of arms - one of the elements of the broader concept of fair trial - requires that each party should be afforded a reasonable opportunity to present his or her case under conditions that do not place him or her at a substantial disadvantage vis-à-vis his or her opponent (see the Dombo Beheer B.V. v. the Netherlands judgment of 27 October 1993, Series A no. 274, p. 19, § 33; Ankerl v. Switzerland judgment of 23 October 1996, Reports of Judgments and Decisions 1996-V, pp. 1567-68, § 38).
• EGMR, 30.10.1991 - 12005/86

  BORGERS v. BELGIUM

  Auszug aus EGMR, 04.06.2002 - 32106/96

  Moreover, while Article 6 of the Convention guarantees the right to a fair hearing, it does not lay down any rules on the admissibility of evidence or the way it should be assessed, which are therefore primarily matters for regulation by national law and the national courts (see, mutatis mutandis, the Schenk v. Switzerland judgment of 12 July 1988, Series A no. 140, p. 29, § 46; the Borgers v. Belgium judgment of 30 October 1991, Series A no. 214-B, p. 31, § 24 and the Garcia Ruiz v. Spain judgment of 21 January 1999, Reports 1999-I, pp. 98-99, § 28).
• EGMR, 12.07.1988 - 10862/84

  SCHENK c. SUISSE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 04.06.2002 - 32106/96

  Moreover, while Article 6 of the Convention guarantees the right to a fair hearing, it does not lay down any rules on the admissibility of evidence or the way it should be assessed, which are therefore primarily matters for regulation by national law and the national courts (see, mutatis mutandis, the Schenk v. Switzerland judgment of 12 July 1988, Series A no. 140, p. 29, § 46; the Borgers v. Belgium judgment of 30 October 1991, Series A no. 214-B, p. 31, § 24 and the Garcia Ruiz v. Spain judgment of 21 January 1999, Reports 1999-I, pp. 98-99, § 28).

• Generalanwalt beim EuGH, 10.03.2016 - C-543/14

  Ordre des barreaux francophones und germanophone u.a. - Mehrwertsteuer - …

  31 - Vgl. beispielsweise Urteile Dombo Beheer B.V./Niederlande vom 27. Oktober 1993 (Beschwerde-Nr. 14448/88, § 33, Serie A Nr. 274), Ankerl/Schweiz vom 23. Oktober 1996 (§ 38, Recueil des arrêts et décisions 1996-V), Kress/Frankreich (Große Kammer, Beschwerde-Nr. 39594/98, § 72, EGMR 2001) und Komanický/Slowakei vom 4. Juni 2002 (Beschwerde-Nr. 32106/96, § 45).