Rechtsprechung
   EGMR, 04.06.2009 - 25929/05   

Zitiervorschläge
https://dejure.org/2009,57348
EGMR, 04.06.2009 - 25929/05 (https://dejure.org/2009,57348)
EGMR, Entscheidung vom 04.06.2009 - 25929/05 (https://dejure.org/2009,57348)
EGMR, Entscheidung vom 04. Juni 2009 - 25929/05 (https://dejure.org/2009,57348)
Tipp: Um den Kurzlink (hier: https://dejure.org/2009,57348) schnell in die Zwischenablage zu kopieren, können Sie die Tastenkombination Alt + R verwenden - auch ohne diesen Bereich zu öffnen.

Volltextveröffentlichung

 
Sortierung



Kontextvorschau





Hinweis: Klicken Sie auf das Sprechblasensymbol, um eine Kontextvorschau im Fließtext zu sehen. Um alle zu sehen, genügt ein Doppelklick.

Wird zitiert von ... (5)

  • EGMR, 11.12.2012 - 38314/06

    GASSNER v. AUSTRIA

    Thus, having regard to the facts of the case and the Court's case-law on the subject, we do not find any reason to reach a different conclusion in the present case from those in cases raising similar issues, where the Court has frequently found violations of Article 6 § 1 of the Convention (see, for instance, Ludescher v. Austria, no. 35019/97, § 22, 20 December 2001; Strobel v. Austria, no. 25929/05, § 27, 4 June 2009; and Almesberger v. Austria, no. 13471/06, § 27, 10 December 2009).
  • EGMR, 07.09.2017 - 53911/11

    RITZ v. AUSTRIA

    Having regard to its case-law on the subject (see for example Otto v. Austria, no. 12702/08, 22 October 2009, and Strobel v. Austria, no. 25929/05, 4 June 2009), the Court considers that in the instant case the length of the proceedings was excessive and failed to meet the "reasonable time" requirement.
  • EGMR, 28.02.2017 - 49664/12

    HAMBERGER v. AUSTRIA

    The Court has frequently found violations of Article 6 § 1 of the Convention in cases raising issues similar to the one in the present case (see Hackel v. Austria, no. 43463/09, §§ 18-21, 21 June 2016; Kugler v. Austria, no. 65631/01, §§ 39-42, 14 October 2010; Otto v. Austria, cited above, §§ 23-25; Strobel v. Austria, no. 25929/05, §§ 26-28, 4 June 2009; and Riepl v. Austria, no. 37040/02, §§ 37-42, 3 February 2005).
  • EGMR, 11.04.2017 - 56672/12

    JEANNEE v. AUSTRIA

    The Court has frequently found violations of Article 6 § 1 of the Convention in cases raising issues similar to the one in the present case (see, among other authorities, Riepl v. Austria, no. 37040/02, §§ 39-42, 3 February 2005; Strobel v. Austria, no. 25929/05, §§ 27-28, 4 June 2009; Otto v. Austria, cited above, §§ 23-25; and Hackel v. Austria, no. 43463/09, §§ 18-21, 21 June 2016).
  • EGMR, 21.06.2016 - 43463/09

    HACKEL v. AUSTRIA

    Having regard to its case-law on the subject (see for example Otto v. Austria, no. 12702/08, 22 October 2009, and Strobel v. Austria, no. 25929/05, 4 June 2009), the Court considers that in the instant case the length of the proceedings was excessive and failed to meet the "reasonable time" requirement.
Haben Sie eine Ergänzung? Oder haben Sie einen Fehler gefunden? Schreiben Sie uns.
Neu: Die Merklistenfunktion erreichen Sie nun über das Lesezeichen oben.
Sie können auswählen (Maus oder Pfeiltasten):
(Liste aufgrund Ihrer bisherigen Eingabe)
Komplette Übersicht