Volltextveröffentlichung

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

  ÇAKIR AND OTHERS v. TURKEY

  Art. 6, Art. 6 Abs. 1, Protokoll Nr. 1 Art. 1, Protokoll Nr. 1 Art. 1 Abs. 1 MRK
  Violation of Article 6 - Right to a fair trial (Article 6 - Civil proceedings Article 6-1 - Access to court) Violation of Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 - Protection of property (Article 1 para. 1 of Protocol No. 1 - Peaceful enjoyment of possessions) ...

Sonstiges

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte (Verfahrensmitteilung)

  Çakir and Others v. Turkey

Wird zitiert von ... (2)Neu Zitiert selbst (3)

• EGMR, 19.06.2001 - 28249/95

  KREUZ c. POLOGNE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 04.06.2013 - 25747/09

  In so far as enforcement proceedings constitute an integral part of the trial, the Court considers that the right to a court, along with access to first-instance and appeal courts for the determination of "civil rights and obligations" (see Kreuz v. Poland, no. 28249/95, §§ 53-54, ECHR 2001-VI), equally protects the right of access to enforcement proceedings (see Ülger, cited above, § 39).
• EGMR, 08.04.2004 - 71503/01

  ASSANIDZE v. GEORGIA

  Auszug aus EGMR, 04.06.2013 - 25747/09

  Consequently, it is for the respondent State to remove any obstacles in its domestic legal system that might prevent the applicants" situation from being adequately redressed (see Assanidze v. Georgia [GC], no. 71503/01, § 198, ECHR 2004-II, and Maestri v. Italy [GC], no. 39748/98, § 47, ECHR 2004-I).
• EGMR, 17.02.2004 - 39748/98

  MAESTRI c. ITALIE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 04.06.2013 - 25747/09

  Consequently, it is for the respondent State to remove any obstacles in its domestic legal system that might prevent the applicants" situation from being adequately redressed (see Assanidze v. Georgia [GC], no. 71503/01, § 198, ECHR 2004-II, and Maestri v. Italy [GC], no. 39748/98, § 47, ECHR 2004-I).

• EGMR - 13455/23 (anhängig)

  YALÇIN v. TÜRKIYE

  Were the applicant's right of access to court protected under Article 6 § 1 of the Convention and his right to peaceful enjoyment of his possessions within the meaning of Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 to the Convention violated as a result of the impossibility to seize the assets of his employer to enforce a court judgment (Çakir and Others v. Turkey, no. 25747/09, §§ 15-26, 4 June 2013; Apostol v. Georgia, no. 40765/02, §§ 56-57, ECHR 2006-XIV; Lunari v. Italy, no. 21463/93, §§ 42 and 45, 11 January 2001; and Immobiliare Saffi v. Italy [GC], no. 22774/93, § 74, ECHR 1999-V)?.
• EGMR - 50185/17 (anhängig)

  ÇETINKAYA v. TÜRKIYE

  Does the non-execution of the judgment of the Bor Civil Court of General Jurisdiction (file no. 2004/51 E. and 2005/33 K.) that awarded compensation to the applicants give rise to a breach of their rights guaranteed by Article 6 § 1 of the Convention and Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 to the Convention (see Dildar v. Turkey, no. 77361/01, 12 December 2006; and Çakir and Others v. Turkey, no. 25747/09, 4 June 2013)?.