Volltextveröffentlichung

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

  ABUBAKAROVA AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA

  Violation of Article 2 - Right to life (Article 2-1 - Life) (Substantive aspect);Violation of Article 2 - Right to life (Article 2-1 - Effective investigation) (Procedural aspect);Violation of Article 3 - Prohibition of torture (Article 3 - Inhuman treatment) ...

Wird zitiert von ... (2)Neu Zitiert selbst (8)

• EGMR, 27.09.1995 - 18984/91

  McCANN AND OTHERS v. THE UNITED KINGDOM

  Auszug aus EGMR, 04.06.2019 - 867/12

  As to costs and expenses, the Court has to establish whether they were actually incurred and whether they were necessary and reasonable as to quantum (see McCann and Others v. the United Kingdom, 27 September 1995, § 220, Series A no. 324).
• EGMR, 18.06.2002 - 25656/94

  ORHAN v. TURKEY

  Auszug aus EGMR, 04.06.2019 - 867/12

  The essence of such a violation does not lie mainly in the fact of the "disappearance" of the family member, but rather concerns the authorities" reactions and attitudes to the situation when it is brought to their attention (see Orhan v. Turkey, no. 25656/94, § 358, 18 June 2002, and Imakayeva v. Russia, no. 7615/02, § 164, ECHR 2006-XIII (extracts)).
• EGMR, 09.11.2006 - 69480/01

  LOULOUÏEV ET AUTRES c. RUSSIE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 04.06.2019 - 867/12

  Where the news of a missing person's death has been preceded by a sufficiently long period during which he or she has been deemed to have disappeared, there exists a distinct period during which the applicants have suffered the uncertainty, anguish and distress characteristic of the specific phenomenon of disappearances (see Luluyev and Others v. Russia, no. 69480/01, § 115, ECHR 2006-XIII (extracts)).

 
• EGMR, 09.11.2006 - 7615/02

  IMAKAÏEVA c. RUSSIE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 04.06.2019 - 867/12

  The essence of such a violation does not lie mainly in the fact of the "disappearance" of the family member, but rather concerns the authorities" reactions and attitudes to the situation when it is brought to their attention (see Orhan v. Turkey, no. 25656/94, § 358, 18 June 2002, and Imakayeva v. Russia, no. 7615/02, § 164, ECHR 2006-XIII (extracts)).
• EGMR, 13.06.2000 - 23531/94

  TIMURTAS c. TURQUIE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 04.06.2019 - 867/12

  In this respect the Court considers that such a situation gives rise to issues which go beyond a mere "irregular detention" in violation of Article 5. Such an interpretation is in keeping with the effective protection of the right to life, as afforded by Article 2, which ranks as one of the most fundamental provisions in the Convention (see, among other authorities, Çakici, cited above, § 86, and Timurtas v. Turkey, no. 23531/94, § 83, ECHR 2000-VI).
• EGMR, 09.05.2000 - 20764/92

  ERTAK c. TURQUIE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 04.06.2019 - 867/12

  Whether a failure on the part of the authorities to provide a plausible explanation as to a detainee's fate, in the absence of a body, might also raise issues under Article 2 of the Convention will depend on all the circumstances of the case, and in particular on the existence of sufficient circumstantial evidence, based on specific evidence, from which it may be concluded to the requisite standard of proof that the detainee must be presumed to have died in custody (see Çakici v. Turkey [GC], no. 23657/94, § 85, ECHR 1999-IV, and Ertak v. Turkey, no. 20764/92, § 131, ECHR 2000-V).
• EGMR, 31.05.2016 - 58055/10

  DOSHUYEVA AND YUSUPOV v. RUSSIA

  Auszug aus EGMR, 04.06.2019 - 867/12

  The delays in opening the criminal cases, and the lulls in the proceedings, cannot therefore be interpreted as failure by the applicants to comply with the six-month requirement (see Abdulkhadzhiyeva and Abdulkhadzhiyev v. Russia, no. 40001/08, §§ 9, 15 and 67, 4 October 2016, where a delay in lodging a formal complaint amounted to eight months, and, by contrast, Doshuyeva and Yusupov v. Russia (dec.), 58055/10, §§ 41-47, 31 May 2016, where the applicants did not contact the investigating authorities for about eight years and three months, while the investigation was seemingly dormant).
• EGMR, 04.10.2016 - 40001/08

  ABDULKHADZHIYEVA AND ABDULKHADZHIYEV v. RUSSIA

  Auszug aus EGMR, 04.06.2019 - 867/12

  The delays in opening the criminal cases, and the lulls in the proceedings, cannot therefore be interpreted as failure by the applicants to comply with the six-month requirement (see Abdulkhadzhiyeva and Abdulkhadzhiyev v. Russia, no. 40001/08, §§ 9, 15 and 67, 4 October 2016, where a delay in lodging a formal complaint amounted to eight months, and, by contrast, Doshuyeva and Yusupov v. Russia (dec.), 58055/10, §§ 41-47, 31 May 2016, where the applicants did not contact the investigating authorities for about eight years and three months, while the investigation was seemingly dormant).

• OVG Saarland, 14.06.2022 - 6 A 850/20
  Dieser Sachverhalt sei gerichtlich bestätigt durch das Urteil des Europäischen Gerichtshofs für Menschenrechte ( EGMR ) vom 4. Juni 2019 (Appl. 867/12, veröffentlicht unter https://hudoc.echr.coe.int), mit dem der Mutter des Klägers wegen der Entführung eine Entschädigung von 80.000 EUR zugesprochen worden ist.
• OVG Sachsen, 14.06.2022 - 6 A 850/20

  Asyl, ; Tschetschenien; Verletzung rechtlichen Gehörs; grundsätzliche Bedeutung

  Dieser Sachverhalt sei gerichtlich bestätigt durch das Urteil des Europäischen Gerichtshofs für Menschenrechte (EGMR) vom 4. Juni 2019 (Appl. 867/12, veröffentlicht unter https://hudoc.echr.coe.int), mit dem der Mutter des Klägers wegen der Entführung eine Entschädigung von 80.000 EUR zugesprochen worden ist.