Volltextveröffentlichung

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

  McMULLEN v. IRELAND

  Art. 6, Art. 6 Abs. 1, Art. 35, Art. 35 Abs. 1 MRK
  Partly admissible Partly inadmissible (englisch)

Verfahrensgang

• EGMR, 04.07.2002 - 42297/98
• EGMR, 29.07.2004 - 42297/98

Wird zitiert von ... (0)Neu Zitiert selbst (7)

• EGMR, 26.10.2000 - 30210/96

  Das Recht auf Verfahrensbeschleunigung gemäß Art. 6 Abs. 1 S. 1 EMRK in …

  Auszug aus EGMR, 04.07.2002 - 42297/98

  There are no detailed submissions on the availability of damages for delay already suffered or on the possibility of such an action being preventative of further delay (Kudla v. Poland [GC], no. 30210/96, ECHR 2000-XI, § 159, and Matthies-Lenzen v. Luxembourg, no. 45165/99, (dec.), 14 June 2001).
• EGMR, 06.12.1988 - 10588/83

  BARBERÀ, MESSEGUÉ AND JABARDO v. SPAIN

  Auszug aus EGMR, 04.07.2002 - 42297/98

  This Court's task therefore is to ascertain whether the proceedings in their entirety (including appeal proceedings) were as a whole fair as required by Article 6 § 1 (Barberà, Messegué and Jabardo v. Spain judgment of 6 December 1988, Series A no. 146, § 68; Helmers v. Sweden judgment of 29 October 1991, Series A no. 212, § 31; Vidal v. Belgium judgment of 22 April 1992, Series A no. 235-B, § 33, and Edwards v. the United Kingdom judgment of 16 December 1992, Series A no. 247-B, § 34).
• EGMR, 25.03.1983 - 5947/72

  SILVER AND OTHERS v. THE UNITED KINGDOM

  Auszug aus EGMR, 04.07.2002 - 42297/98

  It is recalled that the Convention does not lay down for the Contracting States any given manner by which it must ensure within its internal law the effective implementation of any of the provisions of the Convention, for example, by incorporating the Convention into domestic law (Silver and Others v. the United Kingdom judgment of 25 March 1983, Series A no. 61, § 111-119, and the above-cited decision in the case of Quinn v. Ireland).

 
• EGMR, 16.12.1992 - 13071/87

  EDWARDS c. ROYAUME-UNI

  Auszug aus EGMR, 04.07.2002 - 42297/98

  This Court's task therefore is to ascertain whether the proceedings in their entirety (including appeal proceedings) were as a whole fair as required by Article 6 § 1 (Barberà, Messegué and Jabardo v. Spain judgment of 6 December 1988, Series A no. 146, § 68; Helmers v. Sweden judgment of 29 October 1991, Series A no. 212, § 31; Vidal v. Belgium judgment of 22 April 1992, Series A no. 235-B, § 33, and Edwards v. the United Kingdom judgment of 16 December 1992, Series A no. 247-B, § 34).
• EGMR, 06.11.1980 - 7367/76

  GUZZARDI v. ITALY

  Auszug aus EGMR, 04.07.2002 - 42297/98

  In the performance of this task, it is free to give to the facts of the case a characterisation in law which may be even different from that given by the applicant (Handyside v. the United Kingdom judgment of 7 December 1976, Series A no. 24, § 41, and Guzzardi v. Italy judgment of 6 November 1980, Series A no. 39, § 63).
• EGMR, 22.04.1992 - 12351/86

  VIDAL c. BELGIQUE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 04.07.2002 - 42297/98

  This Court's task therefore is to ascertain whether the proceedings in their entirety (including appeal proceedings) were as a whole fair as required by Article 6 § 1 (Barberà, Messegué and Jabardo v. Spain judgment of 6 December 1988, Series A no. 146, § 68; Helmers v. Sweden judgment of 29 October 1991, Series A no. 212, § 31; Vidal v. Belgium judgment of 22 April 1992, Series A no. 235-B, § 33, and Edwards v. the United Kingdom judgment of 16 December 1992, Series A no. 247-B, § 34).
• EGMR, 07.12.1976 - 5493/72

  HANDYSIDE v. THE UNITED KINGDOM

  Auszug aus EGMR, 04.07.2002 - 42297/98

  In the performance of this task, it is free to give to the facts of the case a characterisation in law which may be even different from that given by the applicant (Handyside v. the United Kingdom judgment of 7 December 1976, Series A no. 24, § 41, and Guzzardi v. Italy judgment of 6 November 1980, Series A no. 39, § 63).