Rechtsprechung
| EGMR, 04.07.2002 - 43311/98 |
Zitiervorschläge
Tipp: Um den Kurzlink (hier: https://dejure.org/2002,47892) schnell in die Zwischenablage zu kopieren, können Sie die Tastenkombination Alt + R verwenden - auch ohne diesen Bereich zu öffnen.
Volltextveröffentlichung
- Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte
KÖLL v. AUSTRIA
Wird zitiert von ... (0) Neu Zitiert selbst (5)
- EGMR, 30.06.1993 - 16130/90
SIGURÐUR A. SIGURJÓNSSON v. ICELAND
Auszug aus EGMR, 04.07.2002 - 43311/98
A form of compulsion striking at the very substance of a right guaranteed by Article 11 may in itself amount to an interference with that right (Sigurður A. Sigurjónsson v. Iceland judgment of 30 June 1993, Series A no. 264, pp. 15-17, §§ 35-37).Moreover, according to the Court's case-law, a public law institution founded by the legislature is not an association within the meaning of Article 11 of the Convention (see Sigurður A. Sigurjónsson judgment, op.cit., p. 13, § 31; Sigurður A. Sigurjónsson v. Iceland, Report of the Commission of 15 May 1992, Series A no. 264, p.28, § 68; Le Compte, Van Leuven and De Meyere v. Belgium judgment of 23 June 1981, Series A no. 43, pp. 26-27, §§ 64-65).
- EGMR, 29.04.1999 - 25088/94
CHASSAGNOU ET AUTRES c. FRANCE
Auszug aus EGMR, 04.07.2002 - 43311/98
In the Chassagnou v. France judgment the Court held that the term association in Article 11 of the Convention possesses an autonomous meaning and the classification in national law had only relative value (Chassagnou and Others v. France [GC], nos 25088/94, 28331/95, 28443/05, ECHR 1999-III, § 100). - EGMR, 14.09.1999 - 32441/96
KARAKURT v. AUSTRIA
Auszug aus EGMR, 04.07.2002 - 43311/98
The Court concluded that these hunting associations were associations for the purposes of Article 11 (Chassagnou and Others, op. cit., § 101; see also Karakurt v. Austria, no. 32441/96, 14 September 1999). - EGMR, 17.07.2007 - 28443/05
SAMARDZIC AND AD PLASTIKA v. SERBIA
Auszug aus EGMR, 04.07.2002 - 43311/98
In the Chassagnou v. France judgment the Court held that the term association in Article 11 of the Convention possesses an autonomous meaning and the classification in national law had only relative value (Chassagnou and Others v. France [GC], nos 25088/94, 28331/95, 28443/05, ECHR 1999-III, § 100). - EGMR, 23.06.1981 - 6878/75
LE COMPTE, VAN LEUVEN ET DE MEYERE c. BELGIQUE
Auszug aus EGMR, 04.07.2002 - 43311/98
Moreover, according to the Court's case-law, a public law institution founded by the legislature is not an association within the meaning of Article 11 of the Convention (see Sigurður A. Sigurjónsson judgment, op.cit., p. 13, § 31; Sigurður A. Sigurjónsson v. Iceland, Report of the Commission of 15 May 1992, Series A no. 264, p.28, § 68; Le Compte, Van Leuven and De Meyere v. Belgium judgment of 23 June 1981, Series A no. 43, pp. 26-27, §§ 64-65).