Volltextveröffentlichung

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

  RYLSKI v. POLAND

  Art. 6, Art. 6 Abs. 1, Art. 8, Art. 8 Abs. 1, Art. 29, Art. 29 Abs. 3, Art. 35, Art. 35 Abs. 1 MRK
  No violation of Art. 6-1 (length) Remainder inadmissible (englisch)

Wird zitiert von ...Neu Zitiert selbst (1)

• EGMR, 27.06.2000 - 30979/96

  FRYDLENDER c. FRANCE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 04.07.2006 - 24706/02

  The Court reiterates that the reasonableness of the length of proceedings must be assessed in the light of the circumstances of the case and with reference to the following criteria: the complexity of the case, the conduct of the applicant and the relevant authorities and what was at stake for the applicant in the dispute (see, among many other authorities, Frydlender v. France [GC], no. 30979/96, § 43, ECHR 2000-VII; Malinowska v. Poland, no. 35843/97, 14 December 2000).

• EGMR, 12.01.2017 - 22510/13

  MCNAMARA v. THE UNITED KINGDOM

  However, there may also be situations where no such damage, or only minimal damage, has been ascertained - for instance where an applicant's conduct has entirely or partly caused the procrastination or where the delay has been caused by circumstances independent from the authorities (see Scordino v. Italy (no. 1) [GC], no. 36813/97, § 204, ECHR 2006-V; Proszak v. Poland, 16 December 1997, § 40, Reports of Judgments and Decisions 1997-VIII, with further references; Rylski v. Poland, no. 24706/02, § 76, 4 July 2006; Boczon v. Poland, no. 66079/01, § 51, 30 January 2007, and Piper v. the United Kingdom, no. 44547/10, §§ 56-69 and 73-74, 21 April 2015).