Volltextveröffentlichung

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

  CIAPAS v. LITHUANIA

  Inadmissible (englisch)

Wird zitiert von ...Neu Zitiert selbst (5)

• EGMR, 08.12.2015 - 60119/12

  Z.H. AND R.H. v. SWITZERLAND

  Auszug aus EGMR, 04.07.2017 - 62564/13

  Although, as a rule, cohabitation may be a requirement for such a relationship, other factors may exceptionally also serve to demonstrate that a relationship has sufficient constancy to create de facto "family ties" (see Nazarenko v. Russia, no. 39438/13, § 56, ECHR 2015 (extracts)), including the length of the relationship and whether the couple have demonstrated their commitment to each other (Z.H. and R.H. v. Switzerland, no. 60119/12, § 42, 8 December 2015).
• EGMR, 30.06.2015 - 41418/04

  KHOROSHENKO c. RUSSIE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 04.07.2017 - 62564/13

  A divorce creates a strong presumption towards the end of family life (compare Khoroshenko v. Russia [GC], no. 41418/04, § 89, ECHR 2015; see also Berrehab v. the Netherlands, no. 10730/84, § 21, 21 June 1988).
• EGMR, 16.07.2015 - 39438/13

  NAZARENKO v. RUSSIA

  Auszug aus EGMR, 04.07.2017 - 62564/13

  Although, as a rule, cohabitation may be a requirement for such a relationship, other factors may exceptionally also serve to demonstrate that a relationship has sufficient constancy to create de facto "family ties" (see Nazarenko v. Russia, no. 39438/13, § 56, ECHR 2015 (extracts)), including the length of the relationship and whether the couple have demonstrated their commitment to each other (Z.H. and R.H. v. Switzerland, no. 60119/12, § 42, 8 December 2015).
• EGMR, 21.06.1988 - 10730/84

  BERREHAB v. THE NETHERLANDS

  Auszug aus EGMR, 04.07.2017 - 62564/13

  A divorce creates a strong presumption towards the end of family life (compare Khoroshenko v. Russia [GC], no. 41418/04, § 89, ECHR 2015; see also Berrehab v. the Netherlands, no. 10730/84, § 21, 21 June 1988).
• EGMR, 27.04.2004 - 62543/00

  GORRAIZ LIZARRAGA ET AUTRES c. ESPAGNE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 04.07.2017 - 62564/13

  According to the Court's established case-law, the concept of "victim" must be interpreted autonomously and irrespective of domestic concepts such as those concerning an interest or capacity to act (see Gorraiz Lizarraga and Others v. Spain, no. 62543/00, § 35, ECHR 2004-III).

• EGMR, 25.09.2018 - 14411/16

  OSKIRKO v. LITHUANIA

  For the relevant domestic law and practice as regards visits, see Varnas v. Lithuania (no. 42615/06, §§ 58-61, 9 July 2013) and Ciapas v. Lithuania, ((dec.), no. 62564/13, §§ 10-14, 4 July 2017).

  According to the Court's established case-law, the concept of "victim" must be interpreted autonomously and irrespective of domestic concepts such as those concerning an interest or capacity to act (see Gorraiz Lizarraga and Others v. Spain, no. 62543/00, § 35, ECHR 2004-III, and Ciapas v. Lithuania (dec.), no. 62564/13, § 27, 4 July 2017).