Rechtsprechung
| EGMR, 04.09.2018 - 12653/15 |
Zitiervorschläge
Tipp: Um den Kurzlink (hier: https://dejure.org/2018,26815) schnell in die Zwischenablage zu kopieren, können Sie die Tastenkombination Alt + R verwenden - auch ohne diesen Bereich zu öffnen.
Volltextveröffentlichung
- Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte
DOGOTAR v. THE REPUBLIC OF MOLDOVA
Violation of Article 5 - Right to liberty and security (Article 5-1 - Lawful arrest or detention;Article 5-1-e - Persons of unsound mind) (englisch)
Sonstiges
- Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte (Verfahrensmitteilung)
DOGOTAR v. THE REPUBLIC OF MOLDOVA
Wird zitiert von ... (0) Neu Zitiert selbst (6)
- EGMR, 11.10.2011 - 30951/10
GOROBET v. MOLDOVA
Auszug aus EGMR, 04.09.2018 - 12653/15
17. - EGMR, 04.04.2000 - 26629/95
WITOLD LITWA c. POLOGNE
Auszug aus EGMR, 04.09.2018 - 12653/15
Consequently, no deprivation of liberty will be lawful unless it falls within one of the grounds set out in those sub-paragraphs (see Witold Litwa v. Poland, no. 26629/95, § 49, ECHR 2000-III). - EGMR, 23.02.1984 - 9019/80
LUBERTI v. ITALY
Auszug aus EGMR, 04.09.2018 - 12653/15
The Court reiterates that an individual cannot be considered to be "of unsound mind" for the purposes of Article 5 § 1 of the Convention and deprived of his liberty unless the following three minimum conditions are satisfied: he must be reliably shown to be of unsound mind; the mental disorder must be of a kind or degree warranting compulsory confinement; and the validity of continued confinement depends upon the persistence of such a disorder (see Luberti v. Italy, judgment of 23 February 1984, § 27, Series A no. 75).
- EGMR, 10.05.2007 - 37410/97
KAMIL UZUN c. TURQUIE
Auszug aus EGMR, 04.09.2018 - 12653/15
Having regard to the facts of the case, the submissions of the parties and its findings under Article 5 § 1 of the Convention, the Court considers that it has examined the main legal questions raised in the present application and that there is no need to give a separate ruling on the remaining complaint (see, among other authorities, Kamil Uzun v. Turkey, no. 37410/97, § 64, 10 May 2007 and Centre for Legal Resources on behalf of Valentin Câmpeanu v. Romania [GC], no. 47848/08, § 156, ECHR 2014). - EGMR, 27.11.2007 - 41578/05
DAVID v. MOLDOVA
Auszug aus EGMR, 04.09.2018 - 12653/15
The relevant domestic law concerning detention on remand has been set out in the Court's judgment in David v. Moldova (no. 41578/05, §§ 24-25, 27 November 2007). - EGMR, 17.07.2014 - 47848/08
CENTRE FOR LEGAL RESOURCES ON BEHALF OF VALENTIN CÂMPEANU v. ROMANIA
Auszug aus EGMR, 04.09.2018 - 12653/15
Having regard to the facts of the case, the submissions of the parties and its findings under Article 5 § 1 of the Convention, the Court considers that it has examined the main legal questions raised in the present application and that there is no need to give a separate ruling on the remaining complaint (see, among other authorities, Kamil Uzun v. Turkey, no. 37410/97, § 64, 10 May 2007 and Centre for Legal Resources on behalf of Valentin Câmpeanu v. Romania [GC], no. 47848/08, § 156, ECHR 2014).