Rechtsprechung
| EGMR, 04.10.2016 - 29187/10 |
Zitiervorschläge
Tipp: Um den Kurzlink (hier: https://dejure.org/2016,31343) schnell in die Zwischenablage zu kopieren, können Sie die Tastenkombination Alt + R verwenden - auch ohne diesen Bereich zu öffnen.
Volltextveröffentlichung
- Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte
SMAJGL v. SLOVENIA
No violation of Article 6+6-3-d - Right to a fair trial (Article 6 - Criminal proceedings;Article 6-1 - Fair hearing) (Article 6 - Right to a fair trial;Article 6-3-d - Examination of witnesses) (englisch)
Sonstiges
- Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte (Verfahrensmitteilung)
SMAJGL v. SLOVENIA
Wird zitiert von ... (3) Neu Zitiert selbst (2)
- EGMR, 26.04.1991 - 12398/86
ASCH v. AUSTRIA
Auszug aus EGMR, 04.10.2016 - 29187/10
In this connection, the Court reiterates that the statement of a witness does not always have to be made in court or in public if it is to be admitted as evidence; in particular, this may prove impossible in certain cases (see Asch v. Austria, 26 April 1991, § 27, Series A no. 203). - EGMR, 26.09.2012 - 926/05
TAXQUET CONTRE LA BELGIQUE
Auszug aus EGMR, 04.10.2016 - 29187/10
In addition, the Court's primary concern under Article 6 § 1 is to evaluate the overall fairness of the criminal proceedings (see Taxquet v. Belgium [GC], no. 926/05, § 84, 16 November 2010, with further references therein).
- EGMR, 28.11.2017 - 50142/13
RASTODER v. SLOVENIA
He did neither of those things (see, mutatis mutandis, Smajgl v. Slovenia, no. 29187/10, § 72, 4 October 2016, and Stefancic, cited above, § 46). - EGMR, 18.01.2022 - 430/13
FAYSAL PAMUK v. TURKEY
Moreover, the Court has also pointed out that, as with all complaints under Article 6 § 3, the defendant's inability to examine a witness should be assessed in the light of the impact that it has had on the overall fairness of his trial (see ? majgl v. Slovenia, no. 29187/10, § 61, 4 October 2016). - EGMR, 14.12.2021 - 34176/11
YARDIMCI v. TURKEY
Moreover, the Court has also pointed out that, as with all complaints under Article 6 § 3 of the Convention, the defendant's inability to examine a witness should be assessed in the light of the impact that it has had on the overall fairness of his trial (see ? majgl v. Slovenia, no. 29187/10, § 61, 4 October 2016).