Volltextveröffentlichung

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

  DOROTA KANIA v. POLAND (No. 2)

  No violation of Article 10 - Freedom of expression -General (Article 10-1 - Freedom of expression) (englisch)

Sonstiges

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte (Verfahrensmitteilung)

  KANIA v. POLAND

  Art. 10, Art. 10 Abs. 1 MRK
  [ENG]

Wird zitiert von ...Neu Zitiert selbst (13)

• EGMR, 22.10.2007 - 21279/02

  LINDON, OTCHAKOVSKY-LAURENS ET JULY c. FRANCE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 04.10.2016 - 44436/13

  21279/02 and 36448/02, § 67, ECHR 2007-IV).
• EGMR, 20.05.1999 - 21980/93

  BLADET TROMSØ ET STENSAAS c. NORVEGE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 04.10.2016 - 44436/13

  The protection afforded by Article 10 of the Convention to journalists is subject to the proviso that they act in good faith in order to provide accurate and reliable information in accordance with the tenets of responsible journalism (see, mutatis mutandis, Bladet Tromsø and Stensaas v. Norway [GC], no. 21980/93, § 65, ECHR 1999-III; Fressoz and Roire v. France [GC], no. 29183/95, § 54, ECHR 1999-I; Kasabova v. Bulgaria, no. 22385/03, §§ 61 and 63-68, 19 April 2011; Rusu v. Romania, no. 25721/04, § 24, 8 March 2016; and Times Newspapers Ltd v. the United Kingdom (nos. 1 and 2), nos.
• EGMR, 08.03.2016 - 25721/04

  RUSU v. ROMANIA

  Auszug aus EGMR, 04.10.2016 - 44436/13

  The protection afforded by Article 10 of the Convention to journalists is subject to the proviso that they act in good faith in order to provide accurate and reliable information in accordance with the tenets of responsible journalism (see, mutatis mutandis, Bladet Tromsø and Stensaas v. Norway [GC], no. 21980/93, § 65, ECHR 1999-III; Fressoz and Roire v. France [GC], no. 29183/95, § 54, ECHR 1999-I; Kasabova v. Bulgaria, no. 22385/03, §§ 61 and 63-68, 19 April 2011; Rusu v. Romania, no. 25721/04, § 24, 8 March 2016; and Times Newspapers Ltd v. the United Kingdom (nos. 1 and 2), nos.

 
• EGMR, 19.04.2011 - 22385/03

  KASABOVA v. BULGARIA

  Auszug aus EGMR, 04.10.2016 - 44436/13

  The protection afforded by Article 10 of the Convention to journalists is subject to the proviso that they act in good faith in order to provide accurate and reliable information in accordance with the tenets of responsible journalism (see, mutatis mutandis, Bladet Tromsø and Stensaas v. Norway [GC], no. 21980/93, § 65, ECHR 1999-III; Fressoz and Roire v. France [GC], no. 29183/95, § 54, ECHR 1999-I; Kasabova v. Bulgaria, no. 22385/03, §§ 61 and 63-68, 19 April 2011; Rusu v. Romania, no. 25721/04, § 24, 8 March 2016; and Times Newspapers Ltd v. the United Kingdom (nos. 1 and 2), nos.
• EGMR, 25.01.2000 - 34979/97

  WALKER v. THE UNITED KINGDOM

  Auszug aus EGMR, 04.10.2016 - 44436/13

  It is not open to the Court to set aside the application of that rule solely because a respondent Government have not made a preliminary objection based on that rule (see Walker v. the United Kingdom (dec.), no. 34979/97, ECHR 2000-I).
• EGMR, 21.10.2008 - 20953/06

  WOLEK, KASPROW AND LESKI v. POLAND

  Auszug aus EGMR, 04.10.2016 - 44436/13

  In this connection, the Court reiterates that the journalists" obligations referred to above require that the media should be able to reasonably regard their sources as reliable with respect to the allegation they make, and that the more serious an allegation is, the more solid the factual basis has to be (see Pedersen and Baadsgaard, cited above, § 78; McVicar v. the United Kingdom, no. 46311/99, § 84, ECHR 2002-III; Bladet Tromsø and Stensaas [GC], cited above, § 66; and Wolek, Kasprów and Leski v. Poland (dec.), no. 20953/06, 21 October 2008).
• EGMR, 10.03.2009 - 3002/03

  TIMES NEWSPAPERS LTD c. ROYAUME-UNI (N° 1 et N° 2)

  Auszug aus EGMR, 04.10.2016 - 44436/13

  3002/03 and 23676/03, § 42, ECHR 2009).
• EGMR, 21.01.1999 - 29183/95

  FRESSOZ ET ROIRE c. FRANCE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 04.10.2016 - 44436/13

  The protection afforded by Article 10 of the Convention to journalists is subject to the proviso that they act in good faith in order to provide accurate and reliable information in accordance with the tenets of responsible journalism (see, mutatis mutandis, Bladet Tromsø and Stensaas v. Norway [GC], no. 21980/93, § 65, ECHR 1999-III; Fressoz and Roire v. France [GC], no. 29183/95, § 54, ECHR 1999-I; Kasabova v. Bulgaria, no. 22385/03, §§ 61 and 63-68, 19 April 2011; Rusu v. Romania, no. 25721/04, § 24, 8 March 2016; and Times Newspapers Ltd v. the United Kingdom (nos. 1 and 2), nos.
• EGMR, 08.04.2004 - 71503/01

  ASSANIDZE v. GEORGIA

  Auszug aus EGMR, 04.10.2016 - 44436/13

  On numerous occasions, the Court has considered the six-month rule a public policy rule and that, consequently, it has jurisdiction to apply it of its own motion (see Assanidze v. Georgia [GC], no. 71503/01, § 160, ECHR 2004-II).
• EGMR, 21.09.2010 - 34147/06

  POLANCO TORRES ET MOVILLA POLANCO c. ESPAGNE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 04.10.2016 - 44436/13

  The Court reiterates that the right to protection of reputation is a right which is protected by Article 8 of the Convention as part of the right to respect for private life (see Chauvy and Others v. France, no. 64915/01, § 70, ECHR 2004-VI and Polanco Torres and Movilla Polanco v. Spain, no. 34147/06, § 40, 21 September 2010).
• EGMR, 26.11.1991 - 13585/88

  OBSERVER ET GUARDIAN c. ROYAUME-UNI
• EGMR, 23.09.1994 - 15890/89

  JERSILD v. DENMARK
• EGMR, 26.04.1995 - 15974/90

  PRAGER ET OBERSCHLICK c. AUTRICHE

• EGMR, 24.03.2020 - 58400/14

  KASPROWICZ c. POLOGNE

  La Cour a énoncé dans un certain nombre d'affaires dirigées contre la Pologne la pratique à suivre en ce qui concerne les griefs de violation du droit à la liberté d'expression tirés d'une condamnation fondée sur l'article 212 § 2 du code pénal (voir, par exemple, Lozowska c. Pologne, no 62716/09, 13 janvier 2015, Dorota Kania c. Pologne, no 44436/13, 4 octobre 2016, et Koniuszewski c. Pologne, no 619/12, 14 juin 2016).