Rechtsprechung
EGMR, 04.10.2016 - 59443/12, 59502/12 |
Zitiervorschläge
Tipp: Um den Kurzlink (hier: https://dejure.org/2016,31322) schnell in die Zwischenablage zu kopieren, können Sie die Tastenkombination Alt + R verwenden - auch ohne diesen Bereich zu öffnen.
Volltextveröffentlichung
- Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte
REZNIK AND GUZEYEVA v. RUSSIA
Violation of Article 3 - Prohibition of torture (Article 3 - Degrading treatment) (Substantive aspect) (englisch)
Sonstiges
- Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte (Verfahrensmitteilung)
REZNIK v. RUSSIA and 1 other application
Art. 3, Protokoll Nr. 1 Art. 1 MRK
[ENG]
Wird zitiert von ... (0) Neu Zitiert selbst (12)
- EGMR, 22.05.2012 - 5826/03
IDALOV c. RUSSIE
Auszug aus EGMR, 04.10.2016 - 59443/12
An outline of the Court's case-law under Article 3 of the Convention relating to conditions of detention can be found in a number of judgments concerning Russia (see, in particular, Idalov v. Russia [GC], no. 5826/03, §§ 91-102, 22 May 2012, and Ananyev and Others v. Russia, nos. 42525/07 and 60800/08, §§ 121-66, 10 January 2012). - EGMR, 10.01.2012 - 42525/07
ANANYEV AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA
Auszug aus EGMR, 04.10.2016 - 59443/12
An outline of the Court's case-law under Article 3 of the Convention relating to conditions of detention can be found in a number of judgments concerning Russia (see, in particular, Idalov v. Russia [GC], no. 5826/03, §§ 91-102, 22 May 2012, and Ananyev and Others v. Russia, nos. 42525/07 and 60800/08, §§ 121-66, 10 January 2012). - EGMR, 11.04.2013 - 18813/06
VYATKIN v. RUSSIA
Auszug aus EGMR, 04.10.2016 - 59443/12
It finds such incomplete and selective evidence unconvincing (see, for similar reasoning, Kokoshkina v. Russia, no. 2052/08, § 60, 28 May 2009, and Vyatkin v. Russia, no. 18813/06, § 40, 11 April 2013).
- EGMR, 04.12.2015 - 47143/06
EGMR verurteilt Russland wegen geheimer Telefonüberwachung
Auszug aus EGMR, 04.10.2016 - 59443/12
As to their argument concerning a loss of profit, it was open to them to lodge a claim for compensation under the tort provisions of the Civil Code (see Roman Zakharov v. Russia [GC], no. 47143/06, §§ 101-05, ECHR 2015), which they failed to do. - EGMR, 17.10.2013 - 54996/07
KLYUKIN v. RUSSIA
Auszug aus EGMR, 04.10.2016 - 59443/12
The Court reiterates that alterations in a prison population register, without any explanations as to their origin, reason and timing, has made the information contained in it unreliable (see Glotov v. Russia, no. 41558/05, § 25, 10 May 2012; Manulin v. Russia, no. 26676/06, § 43, 11 April 2013; and Klyukin v. Russia, no. 54996/07, § 59, 17 October 2013). - EGMR, 18.10.2011 - 13099/04
LAUTARU v. ROMANIA
Auszug aus EGMR, 04.10.2016 - 59443/12
The Court has frequently found a violation of Article 3 of the Convention on account of an extreme lack of personal space for detainees (see, for example, Ananyev and Others, cited above, §§ 143 et seq.; Bakhmutskiy v. Russia, no. 36932/02, §§ 88-97, 25 June 2009, which also concerned the conditions of detention in remand prison no. IZ-61/1; and Lautaru v. Romania, no. 13099/04, §§ 99-104, 18 October 2011). - EGMR, 26.09.2000 - 33933/96
GUISSET c. FRANCE
Auszug aus EGMR, 04.10.2016 - 59443/12
The Court reiterates that an applicant may lose his victim status if two conditions are met: first, the authorities acknowledge the alleged violations either expressly or in substance and, second, they afford redress (see Guisset v. France, no. 33933/96, §§ 66-67, ECHR 2000-IX). - EGMR, 25.06.2009 - 36932/02
BAKHMUTSKIY v. RUSSIA
Auszug aus EGMR, 04.10.2016 - 59443/12
The Court has frequently found a violation of Article 3 of the Convention on account of an extreme lack of personal space for detainees (see, for example, Ananyev and Others, cited above, §§ 143 et seq.; Bakhmutskiy v. Russia, no. 36932/02, §§ 88-97, 25 June 2009, which also concerned the conditions of detention in remand prison no. IZ-61/1; and Lautaru v. Romania, no. 13099/04, §§ 99-104, 18 October 2011). - EGMR, 28.05.2009 - 2052/08
KOKOSHKINA v. RUSSIA
Auszug aus EGMR, 04.10.2016 - 59443/12
It finds such incomplete and selective evidence unconvincing (see, for similar reasoning, Kokoshkina v. Russia, no. 2052/08, § 60, 28 May 2009, and Vyatkin v. Russia, no. 18813/06, § 40, 11 April 2013). - EGMR, 11.04.2013 - 26676/06
MANULIN v. RUSSIA
Auszug aus EGMR, 04.10.2016 - 59443/12
The Court reiterates that alterations in a prison population register, without any explanations as to their origin, reason and timing, has made the information contained in it unreliable (see Glotov v. Russia, no. 41558/05, § 25, 10 May 2012; Manulin v. Russia, no. 26676/06, § 43, 11 April 2013; and Klyukin v. Russia, no. 54996/07, § 59, 17 October 2013). - EGMR, 10.05.2012 - 41558/05
GLOTOV v. RUSSIA
- EGMR, 23.10.2012 - 35297/05
ZENTSOV AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA