Rechtsprechung
| EGMR, 04.11.2008 - 12269/02 |
Zitiervorschläge
Tipp: Um den Kurzlink (hier: https://dejure.org/2008,67468) schnell in die Zwischenablage zu kopieren, können Sie die Tastenkombination Alt + R verwenden - auch ohne diesen Bereich zu öffnen.
Volltextveröffentlichung
- Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte
ERYK KOZLOWSKI v. POLAND
(englisch)
Sonstiges
- Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte (Verfahrensmitteilung)
[ENG]
Wird zitiert von ... (0) Neu Zitiert selbst (5)
- EGMR, 16.12.1999 - 24888/94
Mord an James Bulger
Auszug aus EGMR, 04.11.2008 - 12269/02
Any relevance that the latter judgment might possibly have in respect of the present case is therefore reduced by the fact that it was given after the relevant time (see, for example, V. v. the United Kingdom [GC], no. 24888/94, § 57, ECHR 1999-IX). - EGMR, 25.01.2000 - 34979/97
WALKER v. THE UNITED KINGDOM
Auszug aus EGMR, 04.11.2008 - 12269/02
However, it is not open to the Court to set aside the application of the six-month rule solely because a Government have not made a preliminary objection based on it (see Walker v. United Kingdom (dec.), no. 34979/97, ECHR 2000-I, Blecic v. Croatia [GC], no. 59532/00, § 68, ECHR 2006-...). - EGMR, 26.10.2000 - 30210/96
Das Recht auf Verfahrensbeschleunigung gemäß Art. 6 Abs. 1 S. 1 EMRK in …
Auszug aus EGMR, 04.11.2008 - 12269/02
From that date he was detained "after conviction by a competent court, within the meaning of Article 5 § 1 (a) and, consequently, that period of his detention falls outside the scope of Article 5 § 3 (see Kudla v. Poland [GC], no. 30210/96, § 104, ECHR 2000-XI). - EGMR, 08.03.2006 - 59532/00
BLECIC v. CROATIA
Auszug aus EGMR, 04.11.2008 - 12269/02
However, it is not open to the Court to set aside the application of the six-month rule solely because a Government have not made a preliminary objection based on it (see Walker v. United Kingdom (dec.), no. 34979/97, ECHR 2000-I, Blecic v. Croatia [GC], no. 59532/00, § 68, ECHR 2006-...). - EKMR, 06.07.1988 - 12015/86
HILTON c. ROYAUME-UNI
Auszug aus EGMR, 04.11.2008 - 12269/02
Where it is clear from the outset however that no effective remedy is available to an applicant, the period runs from the date of the acts or measures complained of, or from the date of knowledge of that act or its effect or prejudice on the applicant (see e.g. Hilton v. the United Kingdom, no. 12015/86, Commission decision of 6 July 1988, DR 57, p. 108; Finucane v. the United Kingdom, (dec.), no. 29178/95, ECHR 2003-VIII).