Rechtsprechung
| EGMR, 04.12.2007 - 35316/05 |
Zitiervorschläge
Tipp: Um den Kurzlink (hier: https://dejure.org/2007,58316) schnell in die Zwischenablage zu kopieren, können Sie die Tastenkombination Alt + R verwenden - auch ohne diesen Bereich zu öffnen.
Volltextveröffentlichung
- Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte
TOVIS v. SLOVAKIA
Art. 6, Art. 6 Abs. 1, Art. 13 MRK
Partly struck out of the list partly inadmissible (englisch)
Wird zitiert von ... (0) Neu Zitiert selbst (7)
- EGMR, 27.06.2000 - 30979/96
FRYDLENDER c. FRANCE
Auszug aus EGMR, 04.12.2007 - 35316/05
The Court has established in a number of cases its practice concerning complaints about the violation of one's right to a hearing within a reasonable time (see, for example, Frydlender v. France [GC], no. 30979/96, § 43, ECHR 2000-VII; Cocchiarella v. Italy [GC], no. 64886/01, §§ 69-98, ECHR 2006....). - EGMR, 06.02.2001 - 44599/98
BENSAID c. ROYAUME-UNI
Auszug aus EGMR, 04.12.2007 - 35316/05
The Court reiterates that the word "remedy" within the meaning of Article 13 of the Convention does not mean a remedy which is bound to succeed, but simply an accessible remedy before an authority competent to examine the merits of a complaint (see, mutatis mutandis, Bensaid v. the United Kingdom, no. 44599/98, § 56, ECHR 2001-I). - EGMR, 22.10.2002 - 57984/00
ANDRASIK AND OTHERS v. SLOVAKIA
Auszug aus EGMR, 04.12.2007 - 35316/05
57984/00, 60237/00, 60242/00, 60679/00, 60680/00, 68563/01 and 60226/00, ECHR 2002 IX and Obluk v. Slovakia, no. 69484/01, § 60, 20 June 2006).
- EGMR, 01.03.2005 - 53487/99
MERIAKRI v. MOLDOVA
Auszug aus EGMR, 04.12.2007 - 35316/05
To this end, the Court will examine carefully the declaration in the light of the principles emerging from its case-law, in particular the Tahsin Acar judgment (see Tahsin Acar v. Turkey, [GC], no. 26307/95, §§ 75-77, ECHR 2003-VI; Meriakri v. Moldova ((striking out), no. 53487/99, 1 March 2005; Swedish Transport Workers Union v. Sweden ((striking out), no. 53507/99, 18 July 2006; and Van Houten v. the Netherlands ((striking out), no. 25149/03, ECHR 2005 IX). - EGMR, 29.09.2005 - 25149/03
Rechtssache V. H. gegen die NIEDERLANDE
Auszug aus EGMR, 04.12.2007 - 35316/05
To this end, the Court will examine carefully the declaration in the light of the principles emerging from its case-law, in particular the Tahsin Acar judgment (see Tahsin Acar v. Turkey, [GC], no. 26307/95, §§ 75-77, ECHR 2003-VI; Meriakri v. Moldova ((striking out), no. 53487/99, 1 March 2005; Swedish Transport Workers Union v. Sweden ((striking out), no. 53507/99, 18 July 2006; and Van Houten v. the Netherlands ((striking out), no. 25149/03, ECHR 2005 IX). - EGMR, 22.08.2006 - 58174/00
RISKOVA v. SLOVAKIA
Auszug aus EGMR, 04.12.2007 - 35316/05
Furthermore, it has already had occasion to address complaints related to alleged breach of one's right to a hearing within a reasonable time in cases against the Slovak Republic (see, for example, Kuril v. Slovakia, no. 63959/00, §§ 35-43, 3 October 2006; Risková v. Slovakia, no. 58174/00, §§ 88-97, 22 August 2006 or Sika v. Slovakia, no. 2132/02, §§ 28-35, 13 June 2006). - EGMR, 03.10.2006 - 63959/00
KURIL v. SLOVAKIA
Auszug aus EGMR, 04.12.2007 - 35316/05
Furthermore, it has already had occasion to address complaints related to alleged breach of one's right to a hearing within a reasonable time in cases against the Slovak Republic (see, for example, Kuril v. Slovakia, no. 63959/00, §§ 35-43, 3 October 2006; Risková v. Slovakia, no. 58174/00, §§ 88-97, 22 August 2006 or Sika v. Slovakia, no. 2132/02, §§ 28-35, 13 June 2006).