Rechtsprechung
| EGMR, 04.12.2008 - 3027/03 |
Zitiervorschläge
Tipp: Um den Kurzlink (hier: https://dejure.org/2008,60749) schnell in die Zwischenablage zu kopieren, können Sie die Tastenkombination Alt + R verwenden - auch ohne diesen Bereich zu öffnen.
Volltextveröffentlichung
- Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte
SLADKOV v. RUSSIA
Wird zitiert von ... Neu Zitiert selbst (4)
- EGMR, 06.04.2000 - 26772/95
LABITA c. ITALIE
Auszug aus EGMR, 04.12.2008 - 3027/03
The Court reiterates that Article 3 of the Convention prohibits in absolute terms torture or inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment (see Labita v. Italy [GC], no. 26772/95, § 119, ECHR 2000-IV). - EGMR, 19.04.2001 - 28524/95
PEERS v. GREECE
Auszug aus EGMR, 04.12.2008 - 3027/03
Although the purpose of such treatment is a factor to be taken into account, in particular the question of whether it was intended to humiliate or debase the victim, the absence of any such purpose does not inevitably lead to a finding that there has been no violation of Article 3 (see, for example, Peers v. Greece, no. 28524/95, § 74, ECHR 2001-III, and Valasinas v. Lithuania, no. 44558/98, § 101, ECHR 2001-VIII). - EGMR, 24.07.2001 - 44558/98
VALASINAS v. LITHUANIA
Auszug aus EGMR, 04.12.2008 - 3027/03
Although the purpose of such treatment is a factor to be taken into account, in particular the question of whether it was intended to humiliate or debase the victim, the absence of any such purpose does not inevitably lead to a finding that there has been no violation of Article 3 (see, for example, Peers v. Greece, no. 28524/95, § 74, ECHR 2001-III, and Valasinas v. Lithuania, no. 44558/98, § 101, ECHR 2001-VIII). - EGMR, 02.10.2006 - 29858/03
DUCHONOVÁ v. THE CZECH REPUBLIC
Auszug aus EGMR, 04.12.2008 - 3027/03
The Court finds that the proceedings brought by the applicant before the Oktyabrskiy District Court to challenge the prosecutor's decision not to prosecute third persons did not determine his "civil rights and obligations" (see, by contrast, Perez v. France [GC], no. 47287/99, §§ 57-72, ECHR 2004-I; see also Ramsahai and Others v. the Netherlands, no. 52391/99, § 434, 10 November 2005; Ramsahai and Others v. the Netherlands [GC], no. 52391/99, § 360, ECHR 2007-...; and Duchonová v. the Czech Republic (dec.), no. 29858/03, 2 October 2006).
- EGMR, 20.02.2018 - 3619/06
CHUMAKOV c. RUSSIE
Quant au volet civil, la Cour rappelle que cette voie de recours permet de statuer sur le caractère légal du classement sans suite, et que les droits et obligations de caractère civil ne font pas l'objet de l'examen (Sladkov c. Russie (déc.), no 3027/03, 4 décembre 2008).