Rechtsprechung
   EGMR, 04.12.2014 - 76204/11   

Zitiervorschläge
https://dejure.org/2014,37939
EGMR, 04.12.2014 - 76204/11 (https://dejure.org/2014,37939)
EGMR, Entscheidung vom 04.12.2014 - 76204/11 (https://dejure.org/2014,37939)
EGMR, Entscheidung vom 04. Dezember 2014 - 76204/11 (https://dejure.org/2014,37939)
Tipp: Um den Kurzlink (hier: https://dejure.org/2014,37939) schnell in die Zwischenablage zu kopieren, können Sie die Tastenkombination Alt + R verwenden - auch ohne diesen Bereich zu öffnen.

Volltextveröffentlichung

  • Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

    NAVALNYY AND YASHIN v. RUSSIA

    Art. 3, Art. 5, Art. 5 Abs. 1, Art. 6, Art. 6 Abs. 1, Art. 11, Art. 11 Abs. 2, Art. 13, Art. 13+3, Art. 35, Art. 35 Abs. 1, Art. 41 MRK
    Preliminary objection joined to merits and dismissed (Article 35-1 - Exhaustion of domestic remedies) Violation of Article 11 - Freedom of assembly and association Violation of Article 6 - Right to a fair trial (Article 6 - Administrative proceedings Article 6-1 - ...

Sonstiges (2)

 
Sortierung



Kontextvorschau





Hinweis: Klicken Sie auf das Sprechblasensymbol, um eine Kontextvorschau im Fließtext zu sehen. Um alle zu sehen, genügt ein Doppelklick.

Wird zitiert von ... (269)Neu Zitiert selbst (22)

  • EGMR, 24.07.2012 - 40721/08

    FÁBER v. HUNGARY

    Auszug aus EGMR, 04.12.2014 - 76204/11
    In particular, where irregular demonstrators do not engage in acts of violence the Court has required that the public authorities show a certain degree of tolerance towards peaceful gatherings if the freedom of assembly guaranteed by Article 11 of the Convention is not to be deprived of all substance (ibid., § 42; see also see Bukta and Others v. Hungary, no. 25691/04, § 34, ECHR 2007-III; Fáber v. Hungary, no. 40721/08, § 49, 24 July 2012; Berladir and Others v. Russia, no. 34202/06, § 38, 10 July 2012; Malofeyeva v. Russia, no. 36673/04, §§ 136-37, 30 May 2013, and Kasparov, cited above, § 91).

    1, paragraph 34; see also, finally, the opinion of Judge Pinto de Albuquerque in Fáber v. Hungary, no. 40721/08, 24 July 2012, reiterated in the opinion of Judges Raimondi, Jociene and Pinto de Albuquerque in Kudrevicius and Others v. Lithuania, no. 37553/05, 26 November 2013, the opinion of Judges Pinto de Albuquerque, Turkovic and Dedov in Taranenko, cited above, and the opinion of Judges Pinto de Albuquerque and Turkovic, in Primov and Others, cited above).

  • EGMR, 17.07.2008 - 33268/03

    ASHUGHYAN v. ARMENIA

    Auszug aus EGMR, 04.12.2014 - 76204/11
    So too do measures taken by the authorities during a rally, such as dispersal of the rally or the arrest of participants (see Oya Ataman v. Turkey, no. 74552/01, §§ 7 and 30, ECHR 2006-XIII, and Hyde Park and Others v. Moldova, no. 33482/06, §§ 9, 13, 16, 41, 44 and 48, 31 March 2009), and penalties imposed for having taken part in a rally (see Ezelin, cited above, § 41; Osmani and Others v. "the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia" (dec.), no. 50841/99, ECHR 2001-X; Mkrtchyan v. Armenia, no. 6562/03, § 37, 11 January 2007; Galstyan v. Armenia, no. 26986/03, §§ 100-102, 15 November 2007; Ashughyan v. Armenia, no. 33268/03, §§ 75-77, 17 July 2008; and Sergey Kuznetsov v. Russia, no. 10877/04, § 36, 23 October 2008).

    [27] Balçik and Others v. Turkey, no. 25/02, §§ 50-52, 29 November 2007, and Ashughyan v. Armenia, no. 33268/03, § 90, 17 July 2008: "Any demonstration in a public place may cause a certain level of disruption to ordinary life, including disruption of traffic and, where demonstrators do not engage in acts of violence, it is important for the public authorities to show a certain degree of tolerance towards peaceful gatherings if the freedom of assembly guaranteed by Article 11 of the ECHR is not to be deprived of all substance.".

  • EGMR, 17.07.2007 - 25691/04

    BUKTA ET AUTRES c. HONGRIE

    Auszug aus EGMR, 04.12.2014 - 76204/11
    In particular, where irregular demonstrators do not engage in acts of violence the Court has required that the public authorities show a certain degree of tolerance towards peaceful gatherings if the freedom of assembly guaranteed by Article 11 of the Convention is not to be deprived of all substance (ibid., § 42; see also see Bukta and Others v. Hungary, no. 25691/04, § 34, ECHR 2007-III; Fáber v. Hungary, no. 40721/08, § 49, 24 July 2012; Berladir and Others v. Russia, no. 34202/06, § 38, 10 July 2012; Malofeyeva v. Russia, no. 36673/04, §§ 136-37, 30 May 2013, and Kasparov, cited above, § 91).

    [23] Bukta and Others v. Hungary, no. 25691/04, § 36, 17 July 2007.

  • EGMR, 29.11.2007 - 25/02

    BALÇIK AND OTHERS v. TURKEY

    Auszug aus EGMR, 04.12.2014 - 76204/11
    [27] Balçik and Others v. Turkey, no. 25/02, §§ 50-52, 29 November 2007, and Ashughyan v. Armenia, no. 33268/03, § 90, 17 July 2008: "Any demonstration in a public place may cause a certain level of disruption to ordinary life, including disruption of traffic and, where demonstrators do not engage in acts of violence, it is important for the public authorities to show a certain degree of tolerance towards peaceful gatherings if the freedom of assembly guaranteed by Article 11 of the ECHR is not to be deprived of all substance.".
  • EGMR, 26.10.2000 - 30210/96

    Das Recht auf Verfahrensbeschleunigung gemäß Art. 6 Abs. 1 S. 1 EMRK in

    Auszug aus EGMR, 04.12.2014 - 76204/11
    Moreover, it is an important aspect of the principle that the machinery of protection established by the Convention is subsidiary to the national systems safeguarding human rights (see Kudla v. Poland [GC], no. 30210/96, § 152, ECHR 2000-XI, and Handyside v. the United Kingdom, 7 December 1976, § 48, Series A no. 24).
  • EGMR, 07.12.1976 - 5493/72

    HANDYSIDE v. THE UNITED KINGDOM

    Auszug aus EGMR, 04.12.2014 - 76204/11
    Moreover, it is an important aspect of the principle that the machinery of protection established by the Convention is subsidiary to the national systems safeguarding human rights (see Kudla v. Poland [GC], no. 30210/96, § 152, ECHR 2000-XI, and Handyside v. the United Kingdom, 7 December 1976, § 48, Series A no. 24).
  • EGMR, 25.01.2005 - 56529/00

    ENHORN c. SUEDE

    Auszug aus EGMR, 04.12.2014 - 76204/11
    It does not suffice that the deprivation of liberty is in conformity with national law; it must also be necessary in the circumstances (see Witold Litwa v. Poland, no. 26629/95, § 78, ECHR 2000-III, and Enhorn v. Sweden, no. 56529/00, § 42, ECHR 2005-I).
  • EGMR, 04.04.2000 - 26629/95

    WITOLD LITWA c. POLOGNE

    Auszug aus EGMR, 04.12.2014 - 76204/11
    It does not suffice that the deprivation of liberty is in conformity with national law; it must also be necessary in the circumstances (see Witold Litwa v. Poland, no. 26629/95, § 78, ECHR 2000-III, and Enhorn v. Sweden, no. 56529/00, § 42, ECHR 2005-I).
  • EGMR, 09.03.2006 - 59261/00

    MENECHEVA c. RUSSIE

    Auszug aus EGMR, 04.12.2014 - 76204/11
    The Court reiterates that in order to determine whether an offence qualifies as "criminal" for the purposes of Article 6 the Convention, it is necessary to ascertain whether or not the provision defining the offence belongs, in the legal system of the respondent State, to the criminal law; the "very nature of the offence" and the degree of severity of the penalty risked must then be considered (see Menesheva v. Russia, no. 59261/00, § 95, ECHR 2006-III).
  • EGMR, 20.02.2003 - 20652/92

    DJAVIT AN c. TURQUIE

    Auszug aus EGMR, 04.12.2014 - 76204/11
    A refusal to allow an individual to travel for the purpose of attending a meeting amounts to an interference as well (see Djavit An v. Turkey, no. 20652/92, §§ 59-62, ECHR 2003-III).
  • EGMR, 31.03.2009 - 33482/06

    HYDE PARK AND OTHERS v. MOLDOVA

  • EGMR, 04.12.2008 - 30562/04

    S. und Marper ./. Vereinigtes Königreich

  • EGMR, 13.06.2002 - 38361/97

    ANGUELOVA v. BULGARIA

  • EGMR, 06.12.1988 - 10588/83

    BARBERÀ, MESSEGUÉ AND JABARDO v. SPAIN

  • EGMR, 02.10.2008 - 1748/02

    BELOUSOV v. RUSSIA

  • EGMR, 25.10.2005 - 5140/02

    FEDOTOV v. RUSSIA

  • EGMR, 14.02.2006 - 28793/02

    CHRISTIAN DEMOCRATIC PEOPLE'S PARTY v. MOLDOVA

  • EGMR, 04.11.2010 - 20364/05

    ALEKSANDR SOKOLOV v. RUSSIA

  • EGMR, 23.10.2008 - 10877/04

    SERGEY KUZNETSOV v. RUSSIA

  • EGMR, 30.05.2013 - 36673/04

    MALOFEYEVA v. RUSSIA

  • EGMR, 10.07.2012 - 34202/06

    BERLADIR AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA

  • EGMR, 22.04.1992 - 12351/86

    VIDAL c. BELGIQUE

  • EGMR, 04.10.2022 - 25809/17

    NAVALNYY AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA

    Having examined all the material before it, the Court concludes that they disclose violations of Article 5 § 1, Article 6 § 1, Article 6 § 3 (d), Article 11 of the Convention and Article 2 of Protocol No. 7 to the Convention in the light of its findings in Navalnyy and Yashin v. Russia (no. 76204/11, §§ 53-75, 4 December 2014); Schatschaschwili v. Germany ([GC], no. 9154/10, §§ 100-31, ECHR 2015); Karelin v. Russia (no. 926/08, §§ 38-85, 20 September 2016); Tsvetkova and Others v. Russia (nos. 54381/08 and 5 others, §§ 179-91, 10 April 2018); Navalnyy v. Russia ([GC], nos. 29580/12 and 4 others, §§ 71-72 and 83-84, 15 November 2018); and Korneyeva v. Russia (no. 72051/17, § 35, 8 October 2019), as indicated in the Appendix.

    11 - disproportionate measures taken against the applicant as a participant of peaceful assembly, namely dispersal of the assembly and his arrest followed by conviction for an administrative offence (see Navalnyy and Yashin v. Russia, no. 76204/11, §§ 53-75, 4 December 2014);.

    11 - disproportionate measures taken against the applicant as a participant of peaceful assembly, namely dispersal of the assembly and his arrest followed by conviction for an administrative offence (see Navalnyy and Yashin v. Russia, no. 76204/11, §§ 53-75, 4 December 2014);.

    11 - disproportionate measures taken against the applicant as a participant of peaceful assembly, namely dispersal of the assembly and his arrest followed by conviction for an administrative offence (see Navalnyy and Yashin v. Russia, no. 76204/11, §§ 53-75, 4 December 2014);.

    11 - disproportionate measures taken against the applicant as a participant of peaceful assembly, namely dispersal of the assembly and his arrest followed by conviction for an administrative offence (see Navalnyy and Yashin v. Russia, no. 76204/11, §§ 53-75, 4 December 2014);.

    11 - disproportionate measures taken against the applicant as a participant of peaceful assembly, namely dispersal of the assembly and his arrest followed by conviction for an administrative offence (see Navalnyy and Yashin v. Russia, no. 76204/11, §§ 53-75, 4 December 2014);.

    11 - disproportionate measures taken against the applicant as a participant of peaceful assembly, namely dispersal of the assembly and his arrest followed by conviction for an administrative offence (see Navalnyy and Yashin v. Russia, no. 76204/11, §§ 53-75, 4 December 2014);.

    11 - disproportionate measures taken against the applicant as a participant of peaceful assembly, namely dispersal of the assembly and his arrest followed by conviction for an administrative offence (see Navalnyy and Yashin v. Russia, no. 76204/11, §§ 53-75, 4 December 2014);.

    11 - disproportionate measures taken against the applicant as a participant of peaceful assembly, namely dispersal of the assembly and her arrest followed by conviction for an administrative offence (see Navalnyy and Yashin v. Russia, no. 76204/11, §§ 53-75, 4 December 2014);.

    11 - disproportionate measures taken against the applicant as a participant of peaceful assembly, namely dispersal of the assembly and her arrest followed by conviction for an administrative offence (see Navalnyy and Yashin v. Russia, no. 76204/11, §§ 53-75, 4 December 2014);.

    11 - disproportionate measures taken against the applicant as a participant of peaceful assembly, namely dispersal of the assembly and her arrest followed by conviction for an administrative offence (see Navalnyy and Yashin v. Russia, no. 76204/11, §§ 53-75, 4 December 2014);.

    11 - disproportionate measures taken against the applicant as a participant of peaceful assembly, namely dispersal of the assembly and his arrest followed by conviction for an administrative offence (see Navalnyy and Yashin v. Russia, no. 76204/11, §§ 53-75, 4 December 2014);.

    11 - disproportionate measures taken against the applicant as a participant of peaceful assembly, namely dispersal of the assembly and his arrest followed by conviction for an administrative offence (see Navalnyy and Yashin v. Russia, no. 76204/11, §§ 53-75, 4 December 2014);.

    11 - disproportionate measures taken against the applicant as a participant of peaceful assembly, namely dispersal of the assembly and his arrest followed by conviction for an administrative offence (see Navalnyy and Yashin v. Russia, no. 76204/11, §§ 53-75, 4 December 2014);.

    11 - disproportionate measures taken against the applicant as a participant of peaceful assembly, namely dispersal of the assembly and her arrest followed by conviction for an administrative offence (see Navalnyy and Yashin v. Russia, no. 76204/11, §§ 53-75, 4 December 2014);.

  • EGMR, 11.04.2024 - 51766/21

    RYAKIN AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA

    In the leading cases of Frumkin v. Russia, no. 74568/12, ECHR 2016 (extracts), Navalnyy and Yashin v. Russia, no. 76204/11, 4 December 2014 and Kasparov and Others v. Russia, no. 21613/07, 3 October 2013, the Court already found a violation in respect of issues similar to those in the present case.
  • EGMR, 20.09.2016 - 926/08

    KARELIN v. RUSSIA

    The Court has previously examined applications relating to the administrative offence proceedings under Russian law and found violations of Article 6 of the Convention, in particular on account of the fairness requirement (see Menesheva v. Russia, no. 59261/00, §§ 94-100, ECHR 2006-III; Malofeyeva, cited above, §§ 97-120; Kasparov and Others v. Russia, no. 21613/07, §§ 36-69, 3 October 2013; Nemtsov v. Russia, no. 1774/11, §§ 81-94, 31 July 2014; and Navalnyy and Yashin v. Russia, no. 76204/11, §§ 76-85, 4 December 2014).
Haben Sie eine Ergänzung? Oder haben Sie einen Fehler gefunden? Schreiben Sie uns.
Sie können auswählen (Maus oder Pfeiltasten):
(Liste aufgrund Ihrer bisherigen Eingabe)
Komplette Übersicht