Rechtsprechung
| EGMR, 04.12.2018 - 29826/15, 50966/15 |
Zitiervorschläge
Tipp: Um den Kurzlink (hier: https://dejure.org/2018,39954) schnell in die Zwischenablage zu kopieren, können Sie die Tastenkombination Alt + R verwenden - auch ohne diesen Bereich zu öffnen.
Volltextveröffentlichung
- Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte
MICHNO v. LITHUANIA
Violation of Article 3 - Prohibition of torture (Article 3 - Degrading treatment) (Substantive aspect);No violation of Article 13+3 - Right to an effective remedy (Article 13 - Effective remedy) (Article 3 - Prohibition of torture;Degrading treatment);Violation of ...
Sonstiges
Wird zitiert von ... (0) Neu Zitiert selbst (5)
- EGMR, 12.11.2002 - 26761/95
PLOSKI v. POLAND
Auszug aus EGMR, 04.12.2018 - 29826/15
Accordingly, on imprisonment a person does not forfeit his or her Convention rights, including the right to respect for family life (see Ploski v. Poland, no. 26761/95, §§ 32 and 35, 12 November 2002), so that any restriction on those rights must be justified in each individual case (see Dickson, cited above, § 68). - EGMR, 23.02.2012 - 39758/05
TROSIN v. UKRAINE
Auszug aus EGMR, 04.12.2018 - 29826/15
However, it is an essential part of a prisoner's right to respect for family life that the authorities enable him or her or, if need be, assist him or her in maintaining contact with his or her close family (see, among many other authorities, Trosin v. Ukraine, no. 39758/05, § 39, 23 February 2012; Epners-Gefners v. Latvia, no. 37862/02, § 61, 29 May 2012; and Khoroshenko v. Russia [GC], no. 41418/04, § 106, ECHR 2015). - EGMR, 23.04.2013 - 52624/10
HAGYÓ v. HUNGARY
Auszug aus EGMR, 04.12.2018 - 29826/15
Such measures could include limiting the number of family visits, supervising those visits and, if justified by the nature of the offence and the specific individual character of a detainee, subjecting the detainee to a special prison regime or special visiting arrangements (see Hagyó v. Hungary, no. 52624/10, § 84, 23 April 2013). - EGMR, 30.06.2015 - 41418/04
KHOROSHENKO c. RUSSIE
Auszug aus EGMR, 04.12.2018 - 29826/15
However, it is an essential part of a prisoner's right to respect for family life that the authorities enable him or her or, if need be, assist him or her in maintaining contact with his or her close family (see, among many other authorities, Trosin v. Ukraine, no. 39758/05, § 39, 23 February 2012; Epners-Gefners v. Latvia, no. 37862/02, § 61, 29 May 2012; and Khoroshenko v. Russia [GC], no. 41418/04, § 106, ECHR 2015). - EGMR, 20.03.2018 - 37685/10
RADOMILJA AND OTHERS v. CROATIA
Auszug aus EGMR, 04.12.2018 - 29826/15
Under these circumstances and being master of the characterisation to be given in law to the facts of the case (see Radomilja and Others v. Croatia [GC], nos. 37685/10 and 22768/12, §§ 114 and 126, ECHR 2018), the Court considers that the applicant's complaint should be examined from the standpoint of Article 8 of the Convention alone.