Rechtsprechung
| EGMR, 05.01.2016 - 14303/11 |
Zitiervorschläge
Tipp: Um den Kurzlink (hier: https://dejure.org/2016,591) schnell in die Zwischenablage zu kopieren, können Sie die Tastenkombination Alt + R verwenden - auch ohne diesen Bereich zu öffnen.
Volltextveröffentlichung
- Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte
BUDIMIR v. CROATIA
Inadmissible (englisch)
Sonstiges
- Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte (Verfahrensmitteilung)
BUDIMIR v. CROATIA
Art. 8, Art. 8 Abs. 1, Art. 14, Protokoll Nr. 1 Art. 1 MRK
[ENG]
Wird zitiert von ... Neu Zitiert selbst (2)
- EGMR, 10.07.2002 - 39794/98
GRATZINGER ET GRATZINGEROVA c. REPUBLIQUE TCHEQUE
Auszug aus EGMR, 05.01.2016 - 14303/11
"Possessions" can be "existing possessions" or assets, including claims, in respect of which an applicant can argue that he has at least a "legitimate expectation" (which must be of a more concrete nature than a mere hope) that they will be realised, that is that he or she will obtain effective enjoyment of a property right (see, inter alia, Gratzinger and Gratzingerova v. the Czech Republic (dec.) [GC], no. 39794/98, ECHR 2002-VII, § 69, and Kopecký v. Slovakia [GC], no. 44912/98, § 35, ECHR 2004-IX). - EGMR, 22.09.1994 - 13616/88
HENTRICH v. FRANCE
Auszug aus EGMR, 05.01.2016 - 14303/11
The purpose of Article 35 is to afford the Contracting States the opportunity of preventing or putting right violations alleged against them before those allegations are submitted to the Court (see, for example, Gherghina, cited above, § 84; Hentrich v. France, 22 September 1994, § 33, Series A no. 296-A, and Remli v. France, 23 April 1996, § 33, Reports of Judgements and Decisions 1996-II).
- EGMR, 22.11.2022 - 52610/19
GJINARARI v. ALBANIA
In this connection the Court notes that its case-law is an integral part of the Convention system (see Habulinec and Filipovic, cited above, § 30; and Budimir v. Croatia (dec.), no. 14303/11, § 54, 5 January 2016).