Rechtsprechung
   EGMR, 05.01.2016 - 74568/12   

Zitiervorschläge
https://dejure.org/2016,7
EGMR, 05.01.2016 - 74568/12 (https://dejure.org/2016,7)
EGMR, Entscheidung vom 05.01.2016 - 74568/12 (https://dejure.org/2016,7)
EGMR, Entscheidung vom 05. Januar 2016 - 74568/12 (https://dejure.org/2016,7)
Tipp: Um den Kurzlink (hier: https://dejure.org/2016,7) schnell in die Zwischenablage zu kopieren, können Sie die Tastenkombination Alt + R verwenden - auch ohne diesen Bereich zu öffnen.

Volltextveröffentlichung

  • Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

    FRUMKIN v. RUSSIA

    Remainder inadmissible;Violation of Article 11 - Freedom of assembly and association (Article 11-1 - Freedom of peaceful assembly);Violation of Article 11 - Freedom of assembly and association (Article 11-1 - Freedom of peaceful assembly);Violation of Article 5 - ...

Kurzfassungen/Presse

  • lto.de (Kurzinformation)

    Russland verurteilt: 25.000 Euro wegen Festnahme nach Demo

Sonstiges

 
Sortierung


Kontextvorschau



Hinweis: Klicken Sie auf das Sprechblasensymbol, um eine Kontextvorschau im Fließtext zu sehen. Um alle zu sehen, genügt ein Doppelklick.

Wird zitiert von ... (278)Neu Zitiert selbst (22)

  • EGMR, 06.12.1988 - 10588/83

    BARBERÀ, MESSEGUÉ AND JABARDO v. SPAIN

    Auszug aus EGMR, 05.01.2016 - 74568/12
    The failure to do so ran contrary to the fundamental principles of criminal law, namely, in dubio pro reo (see, mutatis mutandis, Barberà, Messegué and Jabardo v. Spain, 6 December 1988, § 77, Series A no. 146; Lavents v. Latvia, no. 58442/00, § 125, 28 November 2002; Melich and Beck v. the Czech Republic, no. 35450/04, § 49, 24 July 2008; and Nemtsov, cited above, § 92).
  • EGMR, 09.03.2006 - 59261/00

    MENECHEVA c. RUSSIE

    Auszug aus EGMR, 05.01.2016 - 74568/12
    The Court reiterates that in order to determine whether an offence qualifies as "criminal" for the purposes of Article 6 the Convention, it is necessary to ascertain whether or not the provision defining the offence belongs, in the legal system of the respondent State, to the criminal law; the "very nature of the offence" and the degree of severity of the penalty risked must then be considered (see Menesheva v. Russia, no. 59261/00, § 95, ECHR 2006-III).
  • EGMR, 05.12.2006 - 74552/01

    OYA ATAMAN c. TURQUIE

    Auszug aus EGMR, 05.01.2016 - 74568/12
    In addition, there may be positive obligations to secure the effective enjoyment of this right (see Oya Ataman v. Turkey, no. 74552/01, § 36, ECHR 2006-XIII).
     
  • EGMR, 17.11.2009 - 26258/07

    RAI ET EVANS c. ROYAUME-UNI

    Auszug aus EGMR, 05.01.2016 - 74568/12
    26258/07 and 26255/07, 17 November 2009; and Gün and Others v. Turkey, no. 8029/07, § 75, 18 June 2013; see also Gerger v. Turkey [GC], no. 24919/94, § 46, 8 July 1999; and United Communist Party of Turkey and Others v. Turkey, 30 January 1998, § 47, Reports of Judgments and Decisions 1998-I).
  • EGMR, 04.12.2008 - 30566/04
    Auszug aus EGMR, 05.01.2016 - 74568/12
    30562/04 and 30566/04, § 101, ECHR 2008; Barraco, cited above, § 42; and Kasparov and Others v. Russia, no. 21613/07, § 86, 3 October 2013).
  • EGMR, 03.10.2013 - 21613/07

    KASPAROV AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA

    Auszug aus EGMR, 05.01.2016 - 74568/12
    30562/04 and 30566/04, § 101, ECHR 2008; Barraco, cited above, § 42; and Kasparov and Others v. Russia, no. 21613/07, § 86, 3 October 2013).
  • EGMR, 26.09.2012 - 926/05

    TAXQUET CONTRE LA BELGIQUE

    Auszug aus EGMR, 05.01.2016 - 74568/12
    In addition, the Court's primary concern under Article 6 § 1 of the Convention is to evaluate the overall fairness of the criminal proceedings (see Taxquet v. Belgium [GC], no. 926/05, § 84, ECHR 2010, with further references therein).
  • EGMR, 18.06.2013 - 8029/07

    GÜN ET AUTRES c. TURQUIE

    Auszug aus EGMR, 05.01.2016 - 74568/12
    26258/07 and 26255/07, 17 November 2009; and Gün and Others v. Turkey, no. 8029/07, § 75, 18 June 2013; see also Gerger v. Turkey [GC], no. 24919/94, § 46, 8 July 1999; and United Communist Party of Turkey and Others v. Turkey, 30 January 1998, § 47, Reports of Judgments and Decisions 1998-I).
  • EGMR, 02.02.2010 - 25196/04

    CHRISTIAN DEMOCRATIC PEOPLE'S PARTY v. MOLDOVA (No. 2)

    Auszug aus EGMR, 05.01.2016 - 74568/12
    The burden of proving the violent intentions of the organisers of a demonstration lies with the authorities (see Christian Democratic People's Party v. Moldova (no. 2), no. 25196/04, § 23, 2 February 2010).
  • EGMR, 07.10.2008 - 10346/05

    EVA MOLNÁR c. HONGRIE

    Auszug aus EGMR, 05.01.2016 - 74568/12
    The limits of tolerance expected towards an irregular assembly depend on the specific circumstances, including the duration and the extent of public disturbance caused by it, and on whether its participants had been given sufficient opportunity to manifest their views (see Cisse v. France, no. 51346/99, §§ 51-52, ECHR 2002-III; Éva Molnár v. Hungary, no. 10346/05, §§ 42-43, 7 October 2008; Navalnyy and Yashin v. Russia, no. 76204/11, §§ 63-64, 4 December 2014; and Kudrevicius, cited above, §§ 155-17 and 176-77).
  • EGMR, 02.10.2001 - 29225/95
  • EGMR, 21.10.2010 - 4916/07

    Alexejew ./. Russland

  • EGMR, 20.10.2005 - 44079/98

    THE UNITED MACEDONIAN ORGANISATION ILINDEN AND IVANOV v. BULGARIA

  • EGMR, 12.06.2014 - 17391/06

    PRIMOV AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA

  • EGMR, 22.04.1992 - 12351/86

    VIDAL c. BELGIQUE

  • EGMR, 17.07.2008 - 33268/03

    ASHUGHYAN v. ARMENIA

  • EGMR, 04.12.2014 - 76204/11

    NAVALNYY AND YASHIN v. RUSSIA

  • EGMR, 21.06.1988 - 10126/82

    Plattform "Ärzte für das Leben" ./. Österreich

  • EGMR, 27.02.2001 - 33354/96

    Recht auf Konfrontation und Befragung von Mitangeklagten als Zeugen im Sinne der …

  • EGMR, 23.10.2008 - 10877/04

    SERGEY KUZNETSOV v. RUSSIA

  • EGMR, 01.02.2005 - 61821/00

    ZILIBERBERG v. MOLDOVA

  • EGMR, 02.10.2001 - 29221/95

    STANKOV AND THE UNITED MACEDONIAN ORGANISATION ILINDEN v. BULGARIA

  • EGMR, 11.04.2024 - 51766/21

    RYAKIN AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA

    In the leading cases of Frumkin v. Russia, no. 74568/12, ECHR 2016 (extracts), Navalnyy and Yashin v. Russia, no. 76204/11, 4 December 2014 and Kasparov and Others v. Russia, no. 21613/07, 3 October 2013, the Court already found a violation in respect of issues similar to those in the present case.
  • EGMR, 17.10.2017 - 101/15

    Urteile gegen Brüder Nawalny "willkürlich"

    In 2011-2012 he organised and led a number of rallies, including an assembly at Bolotnaya Square in Moscow on 6 May 2012 (see, among other sources, Frumkin v. Russia, no. 74568/12, §§ 7-65, ECHR 2016 (extracts)).
  • EGMR, 15.02.2024 - 4604/17

    DMITRIYEVA AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA

    In the leading cases of Frumkin v. Russia, no. 74568/12, ECHR 2016 (extracts), Navalnyy and Yashin v. Russia, no. 76204/11, 4 December 2014, and Kasparov and Others v. Russia, no. 21613/07, 3 October 2013, the Court already found a violation in respect of issues similar to those in the present case.
Haben Sie eine Ergänzung? Oder haben Sie einen Fehler gefunden? Schreiben Sie uns.
Sie können auswählen (Maus oder Pfeiltasten):
(Liste aufgrund Ihrer bisherigen Eingabe)
Komplette Übersicht