Volltextveröffentlichung

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

  ÖZ v. TURKEY

  Inadmissible (englisch)

Wird zitiert von ... (0)Neu Zitiert selbst (11)

• EGMR, 20.03.2008 - 15339/02

  BUDAYEVA AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA

  Auszug aus EGMR, 05.01.2017 - 56995/10

  In these circumstances, having regard to the Court's relevant case-law under Article 2 of the Convention (see, for instance, Budayeva and Others v. Russia, nos. 15339/02, 21166/02, 20058/02, 11673/02 and 15343/02, §§ 128-145, ECHR 2008 (extracts)), and to the general principles developed in its case-law regarding the rule of exhaustion of domestic remedies (see, for instance, Vuckovic and Others v. Serbia (preliminary objection) [GC], nos.
• EGMR, 12.04.2006 - 65731/01

  STEC ET AUTRES c. ROYAUME-UNI

  Auszug aus EGMR, 05.01.2017 - 56995/10

  65731/01 and 65900/01, § 54, ECHR 2005-X; Carson and Others v. the United Kingdom [GC], no. 42184/05, § 64, ECHR 2010; and Rasmussen v. Poland, no. 38886/05, § 71, 28 April 2009).
• EGMR, 24.05.2011 - 23302/03

  ANNA TODOROVA v. BULGARIA

  Auszug aus EGMR, 05.01.2017 - 56995/10

  However, if the infringement of the right to life is not intentional, and save for exceptional situations in the above-mentioned cases where negligence went beyond a mere error of judgment or carelessness, Article 2 does not necessarily require such remedies; the State may meet its obligation by affording victims a civil law remedy, either alone or in conjunction with a criminal law one, enabling any responsibility of the individuals concerned to be established and any appropriate civil redress, such as an order for damages, to be obtained (see, among other authorities, Murillo Saldias and Others v. Spain (dec.), no. 76973/01, 28 November 2006, and Anna Todorova v. Bulgaria, no. 23302/03, § 73, 24 May 2011).

 
• EGMR, 17.07.2014 - 47848/08

  CENTRE FOR LEGAL RESOURCES ON BEHALF OF VALENTIN CÂMPEANU v. ROMANIA

  Auszug aus EGMR, 05.01.2017 - 56995/10

  The State's duty to safeguard the right to life must be considered to involve not only the taking of reasonable measures to ensure the safety of individuals in public places but also, in the event of serious injury or death, having in place an effective independent judicial system securing the availability of legal means capable of promptly establishing the facts, holding accountable those at fault and providing appropriate redress to the victim (see Dodov v. Bulgaria, no. 59548/00, § 83, 17 January 2008; Ciechonska v. Poland, no. 19776/04, § 67, 14 June 2011; and Centre for Legal Resources on behalf of Valentin Câmpeanu v. Romania [GC], no. 47848/08, § 132, ECHR 2014).
• EGMR, 15.04.2014 - 28511/11

  KOSTOVI c. BULGARIE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 05.01.2017 - 56995/10

  This positive obligation has been considered to cover a wide range of sectors (see Ciechonska v. Poland, no. 19776/04, §§ 62-63, 14 June 2011), including dangers emanating from building and construction work (see Pereira Henriques and Others v. Luxembourg (dec.), no. 60255/00, 26 August 2003; Banel v. Lithuania, no. 14326/11, §§ 67-73, 18 June 2013; Kostovi v. Bulgaria (dec.), no. 28511/11, 15 April 2014; and Cevrioglu v. Turkey, no. 69546/12, § 57, 4 October 2016).
• EGMR, 28.04.2009 - 38886/05

  RASMUSSEN v. POLAND

  Auszug aus EGMR, 05.01.2017 - 56995/10

  65731/01 and 65900/01, § 54, ECHR 2005-X; Carson and Others v. the United Kingdom [GC], no. 42184/05, § 64, ECHR 2010; and Rasmussen v. Poland, no. 38886/05, § 71, 28 April 2009).
• EGMR - 45886/07

  [FRE]

  Auszug aus EGMR, 05.01.2017 - 56995/10

  10865/09, 45886/07 and 32431/08, §§ 220-226, ECHR 2014 (extracts); and Sargsyan v. Azerbaijan [GC], no. 40167/06, §§ 115-116, ECHR 2015)), the Court considers that the applicant has failed to pursue her claims concerning the alleged violation of Article 2 of the Convention at domestic level.
• EGMR, 04.10.2016 - 69546/12

  CEVRIOGLU v. TURKEY

  Auszug aus EGMR, 05.01.2017 - 56995/10

  This positive obligation has been considered to cover a wide range of sectors (see Ciechonska v. Poland, no. 19776/04, §§ 62-63, 14 June 2011), including dangers emanating from building and construction work (see Pereira Henriques and Others v. Luxembourg (dec.), no. 60255/00, 26 August 2003; Banel v. Lithuania, no. 14326/11, §§ 67-73, 18 June 2013; Kostovi v. Bulgaria (dec.), no. 28511/11, 15 April 2014; and Cevrioglu v. Turkey, no. 69546/12, § 57, 4 October 2016).
• EGMR, 20.03.2008 - 21166/02

  Auszug aus EGMR, 05.01.2017 - 56995/10

  In these circumstances, having regard to the Court's relevant case-law under Article 2 of the Convention (see, for instance, Budayeva and Others v. Russia, nos. 15339/02, 21166/02, 20058/02, 11673/02 and 15343/02, §§ 128-145, ECHR 2008 (extracts)), and to the general principles developed in its case-law regarding the rule of exhaustion of domestic remedies (see, for instance, Vuckovic and Others v. Serbia (preliminary objection) [GC], nos.
• EGMR, 04.02.2014 - 33647/04

  ORUK c. TURQUIE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 05.01.2017 - 56995/10

  In some exceptional situations the Court has held that the authorities" positive obligations under Article 2 of the Convention extend to criminal law remedies (see Öneryildiz v. Turkey [GC], no. 48939/99, § 93, ECHR 2004-XII, and Oruk v. Turkey, no. 33647/04, §§ 50 and 65, 4 February 2014).
• EGMR, 28.11.2006 - 76973/01

  MURILLO SALDIAS ET AUTRES c. ESPAGNE