Rechtsprechung
EGMR, 05.02.2009 - 21272/03 |
Zitiervorschläge
Tipp: Um den Kurzlink (hier: https://dejure.org/2009,43748) schnell in die Zwischenablage zu kopieren, können Sie die Tastenkombination Alt + R verwenden - auch ohne diesen Bereich zu öffnen.
Volltextveröffentlichungen (2)
- Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte
SAKHNOVSKI c. RUSSIE
Art. 6, Art. 6 Abs. 1, Art. 6 Abs. 3, Art. 6 Abs. 3 Buchst. c, Art. 34, Art. 41 MRK
Exception préliminaire jointe au fond et rejetée (victime) Partiellement irrecevable Violation de l'art. 6-1 et 6-3-c Préjudice moral - réparation (französisch) - Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte
SAKHNOVSKIY v. RUSSIA
Art. 6, Art. 6 Abs. 1, Art. 6 Abs. 3, Art. 6 Abs. 3 Buchst. c, Art. 34, Art. 41 MRK
Preliminary objection joined to merits and dismissed (victim) Remainder inadmissible Violation of Art. 6-1 and 6-3-c Non-pecuniary damage - award (englisch)
Verfahrensgang
- EGMR, 05.02.2009 - 21272/03
- EGMR, 02.11.2010 - 21272/03
- EGMR - 21272/03
Wird zitiert von ... (0) Neu Zitiert selbst (5)
- EGMR, 27.03.2007 - 32432/96
TALAT TUNÇ c. TURQUIE
Auszug aus EGMR, 05.02.2009 - 21272/03
Finally, neither the letter nor the spirit of Article 6 of the Convention prevents a person from waiving of his own free will, either expressly or tacitly, entitlement to the guarantees of a fair trial (see Talat Tunç v. Turkey, no. 32432/96, § 59, 27 March 2007). - EGMR, 13.05.1980 - 6694/74
ARTICO c. ITALIE
Auszug aus EGMR, 05.02.2009 - 21272/03
In that connection it must be borne in mind that the Convention is intended to "guarantee not rights that are theoretical or illusory but rights that are practical and effective" and that assigning a counsel does not in itself ensure the effectiveness of the assistance he may afford an accused (see Imbrioscia v. Switzerland, 24 November 1993, § 38, Series A no. 275, and Artico v. Italy, 13 May 1980, § 33, Series A no. 37). - EGMR, 29.10.1991 - 11826/85
HELMERS c. SUÈDE
Auszug aus EGMR, 05.02.2009 - 21272/03
Regard must be had in assessing this question to, inter alia, the special features of the proceedings involved and the manner in which the defence's interests are presented and protected before the appellate court, particularly in the light of the issues to be decided by it and their importance for the appellant (see Helmers v. Sweden, 29 October 1991, §§ 31-32, Series A no. 212-A; Belziuk v. Poland, 25 March 1998, § 37, Reports 1998-II; Pobornikoff v. Austria, no. 28501/95, § 24, 3 October 2000; and Kucera v. Austria, no. 40072/98, § 25, 3 October 2002). - EGMR, 24.11.1993 - 13972/88
IMBRIOSCIA c. SUISSE
Auszug aus EGMR, 05.02.2009 - 21272/03
In that connection it must be borne in mind that the Convention is intended to "guarantee not rights that are theoretical or illusory but rights that are practical and effective" and that assigning a counsel does not in itself ensure the effectiveness of the assistance he may afford an accused (see Imbrioscia v. Switzerland, 24 November 1993, § 38, Series A no. 275, and Artico v. Italy, 13 May 1980, § 33, Series A no. 37). - EGMR, 24.05.1991 - 12744/87
QUARANTA c. SUISSE
Auszug aus EGMR, 05.02.2009 - 21272/03
It thus leaves to the Contracting States the choice of the means of ensuring that it is secured in their judicial systems, the Court's task being only to ascertain whether the method they have chosen is consistent with the requirements of a fair trial (see Quaranta v. Switzerland, 24 May 1991, § 30, Series A no. 205).