Volltextveröffentlichungen (2)

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

  OLUJIC v. CROATIA

  Art. 6, Art. 6 Abs. 1, Art. 41 MRK
  Remainder inadmissible Violations of Art. 6-1 Non-pecuniary damage - award (englisch)

• Österreichisches Institut für Menschenrechte

  (englisch)

Kurzfassungen/Presse

• RIS Bundeskanzleramt Österreich (Ausführliche Zusammenfassung)

Verfahrensgang

• EGMR, 05.02.2009 - 22330/05
• EGMR, 02.12.2011 - 22330/05

Wird zitiert von ... (2)Neu Zitiert selbst (15)

• EGMR, 16.09.1999 - 29569/95

  BUSCEMI c. ITALIE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 05.02.2009 - 22330/05

  It is the higher demands of justice and the elevated nature of judicial office which impose that duty (see Buscemi v. Italy, no. 29569/95, § 67, ECHR 1999-VI).

  The statements made by the President of the NJC were such as to objectively justify the applicant's fears as to his impartiality (see Buscemi v. Italy, no. 29569/95, § 68, ECHR 1999-VI).

• EGMR, 27.10.1993 - 14448/88

  DOMBO BEHEER B.V. v. THE NETHERLANDS

  Auszug aus EGMR, 05.02.2009 - 22330/05

  The Court's task is to ascertain whether the proceedings in their entirety, including the way in which evidence was taken and submitted, were fair within the meaning of Article 6 § 1 (see, inter alia, Dombo Beheer B.V. v. the Netherlands, 27 October 1993, § 31, Series A no. 274).
• EGMR, 12.07.1988 - 10862/84

  SCHENK c. SUISSE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 05.02.2009 - 22330/05

  The Court reiterates that while Article 6 of the Convention guarantees the right to a fair hearing, it does not lay down any rules on the admissibility of evidence or the way it should be assessed, which are therefore primarily matters for regulation by national law and the national courts (see Schenk v. Switzerland, 12 July 1988, §§ 45-46, Series A no. 140, and Garcia Ruiz v. Spain [GC] no. 30544/96, ECHR 1999-I, § 28).

 
• EGMR, 30.10.1991 - 12005/86

  BORGERS v. BELGIUM

  Auszug aus EGMR, 05.02.2009 - 22330/05

  The Court observes further that, although it is not its task to examine whether the court's refusal to admit the evidence submitted by the applicant was well-founded, in its assessment of compliance of the procedure in question with the principle of equality of arms, which is a feature of the wider concept of a fair trial (see Ekbatani v. Sweden, 26 May 1988, § 30, Series A no. 134), significant importance is attached to appearances and to the increased sensitivity of the public to the fair administration of justice (see Borgers v. Belgium, 30 October 1991, § 24, Series A no. 214-B).
• EGMR, 21.01.1999 - 30544/96

  GARCÍA RUIZ v. SPAIN

  Auszug aus EGMR, 05.02.2009 - 22330/05

  The Court reiterates that while Article 6 of the Convention guarantees the right to a fair hearing, it does not lay down any rules on the admissibility of evidence or the way it should be assessed, which are therefore primarily matters for regulation by national law and the national courts (see Schenk v. Switzerland, 12 July 1988, §§ 45-46, Series A no. 140, and Garcia Ruiz v. Spain [GC] no. 30544/96, ECHR 1999-I, § 28).
• EGMR, 15.06.2004 - 40847/98

  TAMMINEN v. FINLAND

  Auszug aus EGMR, 05.02.2009 - 22330/05

  This principle applies, inter alia, to the application of procedural rules concerning the nomination of witnesses by parties (see Tamminen v. Finland, no. 40847/98, § 38, 15 June 2004).
• EGMR, 26.02.1993 - 13396/87

  PADOVANI v. ITALY

  Auszug aus EGMR, 05.02.2009 - 22330/05

  First and foremost, it is of fundamental importance in a democratic society that the courts inspire confidence in the public and above all, as far as criminal proceedings are concerned, in the accused (see Padovani v. Italy, 26 February 1993, § 27, Series A no. 257-B).
• EGMR, 26.10.1984 - 9186/80

  DE CUBBER v. BELGIUM

  Auszug aus EGMR, 05.02.2009 - 22330/05

  Leaving aside the question of V.M."s subjective impartiality, the Court reiterates that, in respect of the question of objective impartiality even appearances may be of a certain importance or, in other words, "justice must not only be done, it must also be seen to be done" (see De Cubber v. Belgium, 26 October 1984, § 26, Series A no. 86).
• EGMR, 24.05.1989 - 10486/83

  HAUSCHILDT c. DANEMARK

  Auszug aus EGMR, 05.02.2009 - 22330/05

  In applying the subjective test the Court has consistently held that the personal impartiality of a judge must be presumed until there is proof to the contrary (see Hauschildt v. Denmark, 24 May 1989, § 47, Series A no. 154).
• EGMR, 01.10.1982 - 8692/79

  PIERSACK v. BELGIUM

  Auszug aus EGMR, 05.02.2009 - 22330/05

  The Court has thus distinguished between a subjective approach, that is endeavouring to ascertain the personal conviction or interest of a given judge in a particular case, and an objective approach, that is determining whether he or she offered sufficient guarantees to exclude any legitimate doubt in this respect (see Piersack v. Belgium, 1 October 1982, § 30, Series A no. 53, and Grieves v. the United Kingdom [GC], no. 57067/00, § 69, ECHR 2003-XII).
• EGMR, 22.02.1984 - 8209/78

  Sutter ./. Schweiz
• EGMR, 26.09.1995 - 18160/91

  DIENNET v. FRANCE
• EGMR, 10.05.2001 - 29392/95

  Z ET AUTRES c. ROYAUME-UNI
• EGMR, 28.11.2002 - 58442/00

  LAVENTS c. LETTONIE
• EGMR, 13.02.2003 - 49636/99

  CHEVROL c. FRANCE

• BVerfG, 19.10.2011 - 2 BvR 754/10

  Verletzung des Anspruchs auf effektiven Rechtsschutz durch Nichtzulassung der …

  Wie durch die folgende Kammerrechtsprechung klargestellt wurde, gilt dies auch für beamtenrechtliche Disziplinarverfahren (vgl. EGMR…, Urteil vom 30. September 2008 - 37829/05 -, Yilmaz ./. Türkei, Rn. 4, 19; Urteil vom 5. Februar 2009 - 22330/05 -, Olujic ./. Kroatien, Rn. 5, 34 ff., 44).
• Generalanwalt beim EuGH, 06.05.2021 - C-791/19

  Generalanwalt Tanchev: Der Gerichtshof sollte urteilen, dass das polnische Gesetz …

  80 Zur Anwendung in einem Disziplinarverfahren gegen Richter siehe Urteil vom 5. Februar 2009, 01ujic/Kroatien (CE:ECHR:2009:0205JUD002233005, §§ 77 bis 91) (Feststellung des Verstoßes gegen das Erfordernis der angemessenen Verfahrensdauer und der Waffengleichheit).