Volltextveröffentlichung

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

  MARTIROSYAN v. ARMENIA

  Art. 7, Art. 7 Abs. 1 MRK
  No violation of Article 7 - No punishment without law (Article 7-1 - Nullum crimen sine lege Retroactivity) (englisch)

Sonstiges (2)

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte (Verfahrensmitteilung)

  Martirosyan v. Armenia

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte (Verfahrensmitteilung)

  [ENG]

Wird zitiert von ... (2)Neu Zitiert selbst (6)

• EGMR, 22.03.2001 - 34044/96

  Schießbefehl

  Auszug aus EGMR, 05.02.2013 - 23341/06

  When speaking of "law" Article 7 alludes to the very same concept as that to which the Convention refers elsewhere when using that term, a concept which comprises written as well as unwritten law and implies qualitative requirements, notably those of accessibility and foreseeability (see, among other authorities, S.W. v. the United Kingdom and C.R. v. the United Kingdom, judgments of 22 November 1995, Series A no. 335-C, §§ 34-35 and §§ 32-33; and Streletz, Kessler and Krenz v. Germany [GC], no. 34044/96, 35532/97, 44801/98, § 50, ECHR 2001-II).
• EGMR, 03.10.2006 - 543/03

  McKAY c. ROYAUME-UNI

  Auszug aus EGMR, 05.02.2013 - 23341/06

  As far as Article 5 § 3 is concerned the Court reiterates that the domestic courts are obliged under Article 5 § 3 to review the continued detention of persons pending trial with a view to ensuring release when circumstances no longer justify continued deprivation of liberty (see McKay v. the United Kingdom [GC], no. 543/03, § 45, ECHR 2006-X; and Kaszczyniec v. Poland, no. 59526/00, § 51, 22 May 2007).
• EGMR, 22.05.2007 - 59526/00

  KASZCZYNIEC v. POLAND

  Auszug aus EGMR, 05.02.2013 - 23341/06

  As far as Article 5 § 3 is concerned the Court reiterates that the domestic courts are obliged under Article 5 § 3 to review the continued detention of persons pending trial with a view to ensuring release when circumstances no longer justify continued deprivation of liberty (see McKay v. the United Kingdom [GC], no. 543/03, § 45, ECHR 2006-X; and Kaszczyniec v. Poland, no. 59526/00, § 51, 22 May 2007).

 
• EGMR, 17.09.2009 - 10249/03

  Rückwirkende Strafschärfung und Anerkennung des Meistbegünstigungsprinzips als …

  Auszug aus EGMR, 05.02.2013 - 23341/06

  It should be construed and applied, as follows from its object and purpose, in such a way as to provide effective safeguards against arbitrary prosecution, conviction and punishment (see Scoppola v. Italy (no. 2) [GC], no. 10249/03, § 92, 17 September 2009; or Huhtamäki v. Finland, no. 54468/09, § 41, 6 March 2012).
• EGMR, 06.03.2012 - 54468/09

  HUHTAMAKI v. FINLAND

  Auszug aus EGMR, 05.02.2013 - 23341/06

  It should be construed and applied, as follows from its object and purpose, in such a way as to provide effective safeguards against arbitrary prosecution, conviction and punishment (see Scoppola v. Italy (no. 2) [GC], no. 10249/03, § 92, 17 September 2009; or Huhtamäki v. Finland, no. 54468/09, § 41, 6 March 2012).
• EGMR, 28.10.1998 - 24760/94

  ASSENOV AND OTHERS v. BULGARIA

  Auszug aus EGMR, 05.02.2013 - 23341/06

  In order to comply with the rule, normal recourse should be had by an applicant to remedies which are available and sufficient to afford redress in respect of the breaches alleged (see, among other authorities, Assenov and Others v. Bulgaria, no. 24760/94, § 85, ECHR 1999-VIII).

• EGMR, 18.10.2018 - 46245/08

  AYVAZYAN v. ARMENIA

  Secondly, after the trial court decided on 13 May 2008 to set the case down for trial and to keep the applicant in detention, he had the right under Article 136 of the CCP to lodge a request for release on bail which he had failed to do (see Martirosyan v. Armenia, no. 23341/06, § 44, 5 February 2013).
• EGMR, 21.06.2022 - 28597/14

  AFITSERYAN v. ARMENIA

  The Government argued, with reference to the case of Martirosyan v. Armenia (no. 23341/06, §§ 44-49, 5 February 2013), that the applicant had failed to exhaust the domestic remedies by not lodging any applications for release in the course of his detention during trial.