Rechtsprechung
EGMR, 05.02.2013 - 76317/11 |
Zitiervorschläge
Tipp: Um den Kurzlink (hier: https://dejure.org/2013,1289) schnell in die Zwischenablage zu kopieren, können Sie die Tastenkombination Alt + R verwenden - auch ohne diesen Bereich zu öffnen.
Volltextveröffentlichung
- Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte
BUBNOV v. RUSSIA
Art. 3 MRK
No violation of Article 3 - Prohibition of torture (Article 3 - Degrading treatment Inhuman treatment) (Substantive aspect) (englisch)
Sonstiges (2)
- Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte (Verfahrensmitteilung)
Bubnov v. Russia
- Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte (Verfahrensmitteilung)
BUBNOV v. RUSSIA
Art. 3 MRK
[ENG]
Wird zitiert von ... Neu Zitiert selbst (6)
- EGMR, 29.04.2002 - 2346/02
Vereinbarkeit der strafrechtlichen Verfolgung der Beihilfe zum Selbstmord mit der …
Auszug aus EGMR, 05.02.2013 - 76317/11
However, even in the absence of these, where treatment humiliates or debases an individual, showing a lack of respect for or diminishing his or her human dignity, or arouses feelings of fear, anguish or inferiority capable of breaking an individual's moral and physical resistance, it may be characterised as degrading and also fall within the prohibition of Article 3 (see Pretty v. the United Kingdom, no. 2346/02, § 52, ECHR 2002-III, with further references). - EGMR, 13.07.2006 - 26853/04
POPOV v. RUSSIA
Auszug aus EGMR, 05.02.2013 - 76317/11
The State must ensure that a person is detained in conditions which are compatible with respect for human dignity, that the manner and method of the execution of the measure of deprivation of liberty do not subject him to distress or hardship of an intensity exceeding the unavoidable level of suffering inherent in detention and that, given the practical demands of imprisonment, his health and well-being are adequately secured (see Kudla v. Poland [GC], no. 30210/96, §§ 92-94, ECHR 2000-XI, and Popov v. Russia, no. 26853/04, § 208, 13 July 2006). - EGMR, 26.10.2006 - 59696/00
KHUDOBIN v. RUSSIA
Auszug aus EGMR, 05.02.2013 - 76317/11
The Court reiterates in this regard that even though Article 3 does not entitle a detainee to be released "on compassionate grounds", it has always interpreted the requirement to secure the health and well-being of detainees, among other things, as an obligation on the part of the State to provide detainees with the requisite medical assistance (see Kudla, cited above, § 94; Kalashnikov v. Russia, no. 47095/99, § 95, ECHR 2002-VI; and Khudobin v. Russia, no. 59696/00, § 96, ECHR 2006-XII (extracts)).
- EGMR, 03.04.2012 - 7842/04
VERBINT v. ROMANIA
Auszug aus EGMR, 05.02.2013 - 76317/11
Ill-treatment must, however, attain a minimum level of severity if it is to fall within the scope of Article 3. The assessment of this minimum is relative: it depends on all the circumstances of the case, such as the duration of the treatment, its physical and mental effects and, in some cases, the sex, age and state of health of the victim (see, among other authorities, Verbint v. Romania, no. 7842/04, § 63, 3 April 2012, with further references). - EGMR, 06.04.2000 - 26772/95
LABITA c. ITALIE
Auszug aus EGMR, 05.02.2013 - 76317/11
It prohibits in absolute terms torture or inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment, irrespective of the circumstances and the victim's behaviour (see, for example, Labita v. Italy [GC], no. 26772/95, § 119, ECHR 2000-IV). - EGMR, 26.10.2000 - 30210/96
Das Recht auf Verfahrensbeschleunigung gemäß Art. 6 Abs. 1 S. 1 EMRK in …
Auszug aus EGMR, 05.02.2013 - 76317/11
The State must ensure that a person is detained in conditions which are compatible with respect for human dignity, that the manner and method of the execution of the measure of deprivation of liberty do not subject him to distress or hardship of an intensity exceeding the unavoidable level of suffering inherent in detention and that, given the practical demands of imprisonment, his health and well-being are adequately secured (see Kudla v. Poland [GC], no. 30210/96, §§ 92-94, ECHR 2000-XI, and Popov v. Russia, no. 26853/04, § 208, 13 July 2006).
- EGMR, 27.11.2014 - 18785/13
KOUTALIDIS c. GRÈCE
En outre, la Cour rappelle que, en principe, le manque de soins médicaux appropriés peut constituer un traitement contraire à l'article 3 (Ä°lhan c. Turquie [GC], no 22277/93, § 87, CEDH 2000-VII, Gennadiy Naoumenko c. Ukraine, no 42023/98, § 112, 10 février 2004, Gurenko c. Russie, no 41828/10, 5 février 2013, Bubnov c. Russie, no 76317/11, 5 février 2013, Budanov c. Russie, no 66583/11, 9 janvier 2014, et Gorelov c. Russie, no 49072/11, 9 janvier 2014).