Rechtsprechung
| EGMR, 05.02.2015 - 2834/09 |
Zitiervorschläge
Tipp: Um den Kurzlink (hier: https://dejure.org/2015,961) schnell in die Zwischenablage zu kopieren, können Sie die Tastenkombination Alt + R verwenden - auch ohne diesen Bereich zu öffnen.
Volltextveröffentlichung
- Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte
KÜCHER v. AUSTRIA
Art. 6, Art. 6 Abs. 1, Art. 13 MRK
Violation of Article 6 - Right to a fair trial (Article 6 - Administrative proceedings Article 6-1 - Reasonable time) Violation of Article 13 - Right to an effective remedy (Article 13 - Effective remedy) (englisch)
Wird zitiert von ... (0) Neu Zitiert selbst (5)
- EGMR, 25.03.1999 - 25444/94
PÉLISSIER AND SASSI v. FRANCE
Auszug aus EGMR, 05.02.2015 - 2834/09
The Court reiterates that the reasonableness of the length of proceedings must be assessed in the light of the circumstances of the case and with reference to the following criteria: the complexity of the case, the conduct of the applicant and the relevant authorities (see, among many other authorities, Pélissier and Sassi v. France [GC], no. 25444/94, § 67, ECHR 1999-II). - EGMR, 13.11.2003 - 27156/02
MORBY contre le LUXEMBOURG
Auszug aus EGMR, 05.02.2015 - 2834/09
Further, the Court notes that even though the Independent Administrative Tribunal had considered the length of the proceedings as a mitigating factor when fixing the fine, it had not properly acknowledged a violation of the Convention, neither has it specified the redress awarded to the applicant (compare, among many other authorities, Scordino v. Italy (no. 1) [GC], no. 36813/97, § 186, ECHR 2006-V, and Morby v. Luxembourg (dec.), no. 27156/02, ECHR 2003-XI). - EGMR, 01.07.2010 - 25551/05
KOROLEV c. RUSSIE
Auszug aus EGMR, 05.02.2015 - 2834/09
Even modest pecuniary damage may be significant in the light of the person's specific condition and the economic situation of the country or region in which he or she lives (see Korolev v. Russia (dec.), no. 25551/05, 1 July 2010). - EGMR, 30.08.2011 - 35365/05
LADYGIN v. RUSSIA
Auszug aus EGMR, 05.02.2015 - 2834/09
The Court reiterates that this admissibility criterion hinges on the idea that a violation of a right, however real from a purely legal point of view, should attain a minimum level of severity to warrant consideration by an international court (see Ladygin v. Russia (dec.), no. 35365/05, 30 August 2011). - EGMR, 06.03.2012 - 23563/07
GAGLIANO GIORGI c. ITALIE
Auszug aus EGMR, 05.02.2015 - 2834/09
The assessment of this minimum level is, in the nature of things, relative and depends on all the circumstances of the case (see Gagliano Giorgi v. Italy, no. 23563/07, § 55, ECHR 2012 (extracts)).