Rechtsprechung
   EGMR, 05.02.2019 - 4246/14, 33840/14, 12821/15, 52007/16, 61992/16   

Zitiervorschläge
https://dejure.org/2019,9197
EGMR, 05.02.2019 - 4246/14, 33840/14, 12821/15, 52007/16, 61992/16 (https://dejure.org/2019,9197)
EGMR, Entscheidung vom 05.02.2019 - 4246/14, 33840/14, 12821/15, 52007/16, 61992/16 (https://dejure.org/2019,9197)
EGMR, Entscheidung vom 05. Februar 2019 - 4246/14, 33840/14, 12821/15, 52007/16, 61992/16 (https://dejure.org/2019,9197)
Tipp: Um den Kurzlink (hier: https://dejure.org/2019,9197) schnell in die Zwischenablage zu kopieren, können Sie die Tastenkombination Alt + R verwenden - auch ohne diesen Bereich zu öffnen.

Volltextveröffentlichung

 
Sortierung



Kontextvorschau





Hinweis: Klicken Sie auf das Sprechblasensymbol, um eine Kontextvorschau im Fließtext zu sehen. Um alle zu sehen, genügt ein Doppelklick.

Wird zitiert von ... (0)Neu Zitiert selbst (4)

  • EGMR, 30.06.2015 - 41418/04

    KHOROSHENKO c. RUSSIE

    Auszug aus EGMR, 05.02.2019 - 4246/14
    For other relevant provisions of domestic law and international law and practice see Khoroshenko v. Russia [GC], no. 41418/04, §§ 32-80, ECHR 2015.

    In the case of Khoroshenko v. Russia ([GC], no. 41418/04, ECHR 2015), by contrast, the Court was satisfied that the applicant could claim to be a victim of the violation alleged because he had convincingly demonstrated that he had relatives and friends with whom he wished to maintain contact whilst in detention (ibid., § 19), that he had used his right to family visits as frequently as had been permitted under the domestic law, and that he had received visits from his mother, his father and his brother.

  • EGMR, 17.07.2014 - 47848/08

    CENTRE FOR LEGAL RESOURCES ON BEHALF OF VALENTIN CÂMPEANU v. ROMANIA

    Auszug aus EGMR, 05.02.2019 - 4246/14
    In order to make that claim, a person must be directly affected by the impugned measure: the Convention does not envisage the bringing of an actio popularis for the interpretation of the rights it contains (see Centre for Legal Resources on behalf of Valentin Câmpeanu v. Romania [GC], no.47848/08, § 101, ECHR 2014, with further references).
  • EGMR, 27.04.1988 - 9659/82

    BOYLE AND RICE v. THE UNITED KINGDOM

    Auszug aus EGMR, 05.02.2019 - 4246/14
    According to the Court's case-law, this provision applies only where an individual has an "arguable claim" to be the victim of a violation of a Convention right (see, among other authorities, Boyle and Rice v. the United Kingdom, 27 April 1988, § 51, Series A no. 131).
  • EGMR, 03.07.2018 - 78123/13

    DAKTARAS v. LITHUANIA

    Auszug aus EGMR, 05.02.2019 - 4246/14
    Thus in the case of Daktaras v. Lithuania ([Committee] (dec.), no. 78123/13, 3 July 2018) it declared the application inadmissible (incompatible ratione personae with the provisions of the Convention) because the applicant had failed to submit evidence showing that he had sought particular visits whilst in detention (ibid., §§ 60-61).
Haben Sie eine Ergänzung? Oder haben Sie einen Fehler gefunden? Schreiben Sie uns.
Sie können auswählen (Maus oder Pfeiltasten):
(Liste aufgrund Ihrer bisherigen Eingabe)
Komplette Übersicht