Volltextveröffentlichung

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

  BYCHKOV v. RUSSIA

  (englisch)

Wird zitiert von ...Neu Zitiert selbst (8)

• EGMR, 15.07.2002 - 47095/99

  Russland, Haftbedingungen, EMRK, Europäische Menschenrechtskonvention, …

  Auszug aus EGMR, 05.03.2009 - 39420/03

  However the Government did not demonstrate what redress could have been afforded to the applicant by such a measure, taking into account that the problems arising from the conditions of his detention were apparently of a structural nature and did not only concern his personal situation (see Kalashnikov v. Russia (dec.), no. 47095/99, 18 September 2001, Mamedova v. Russia, no. 7064/05, § 57, 1 June 2006; and Benediktov, cited above, §§ 29-30).

  An outline of the Court's case-law under Article 3 of the Convention on account of the conditions of detention can be found in a number of judgments concerning Russia (see, in particular, Kalashnikov v. Russia, no. 47095/99, §§ 95 et seq., ECHR 2002-VI, and Mayzit v. Russia no. 63378/00, §§ 34 et seq., 20 January 2005).

• EGMR, 08.11.2005 - 6847/02

  KHOUDOÏOROV c. RUSSIE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 05.03.2009 - 39420/03

  Relevant international documents and reports concerning the conditions in Russian penitentiary establishments can be found in the judgment of 25 October 2005 in the case of Fedotov v. Russia, (no. 5140/02, §§ 54-55), judgment of 10 May 2007 in the case of Benediktov v. Russia, (no. 106/02, § 21) and judgment of 8 November 2005 in the case of Khudoyorov v. Russia (no. 6847/02, §§ 97-98).

  The Court has frequently found a violation of Article 3 of the Convention on account of a lack of personal space afforded to detainees (see Khudoyorov v. Russia, no. 6847/02, § 104 et seq., ECHR 2005-... (extracts); Labzov v. Russia, no. 62208/00, § 44 et seq., 16 June 2005; Novoselov v. Russia, no. 66460/01, § 41 et seq., 2 June 2005; Mayzit v. Russia, cited above, § 39 et seq.; and Kalashnikov v. Russia, cited above, § 97 et seq.).

• EGMR, 02.06.2005 - 66460/01

  NOVOSELOV v. RUSSIA

  Auszug aus EGMR, 05.03.2009 - 39420/03

  The Court has frequently found a violation of Article 3 of the Convention on account of a lack of personal space afforded to detainees (see Khudoyorov v. Russia, no. 6847/02, § 104 et seq., ECHR 2005-... (extracts); Labzov v. Russia, no. 62208/00, § 44 et seq., 16 June 2005; Novoselov v. Russia, no. 66460/01, § 41 et seq., 2 June 2005; Mayzit v. Russia, cited above, § 39 et seq.; and Kalashnikov v. Russia, cited above, § 97 et seq.).

 
• EGMR, 09.06.2005 - 55723/00

  FADEÏEVA c. RUSSIE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 05.03.2009 - 39420/03

  A failure on a Government's part to submit such information without a satisfactory explanation may give rise to the drawing of inferences as to the well-foundedness of the applicant's allegations (see, among other authorities, Fadeyeva v. Russia, no. 55723/00, § 79, ECHR 2005-IV, and Ahmet Özkan and Others v. Turkey, no. 21689/93, § 426, 6 April 2004).
• EGMR, 16.06.2005 - 62208/00

  LABZOV v. RUSSIA

  Auszug aus EGMR, 05.03.2009 - 39420/03

  The Court has frequently found a violation of Article 3 of the Convention on account of a lack of personal space afforded to detainees (see Khudoyorov v. Russia, no. 6847/02, § 104 et seq., ECHR 2005-... (extracts); Labzov v. Russia, no. 62208/00, § 44 et seq., 16 June 2005; Novoselov v. Russia, no. 66460/01, § 41 et seq., 2 June 2005; Mayzit v. Russia, cited above, § 39 et seq.; and Kalashnikov v. Russia, cited above, § 97 et seq.).
• EGMR, 07.06.2007 - 34000/02

  IGOR IVANOV v. RUSSIA

  Auszug aus EGMR, 05.03.2009 - 39420/03

  More specifically, the Court has recently found a violation of Article 3 on account of an applicant's detention in overcrowded conditions in the same detention facilities and approximately at the same time (see Benediktov, cited above, §§ 31-41, Igor Ivanov v. Russia, no. 34000/02, §§ 16-18, and §§ 30-41, 7 June 2007; and Sudarkov v. Russia, no. 3130/03, §§ 40-51, 10 July 2008).
• EGMR, 10.07.2008 - 3130/03

  SUDARKOV v. RUSSIA

  Auszug aus EGMR, 05.03.2009 - 39420/03

  More specifically, the Court has recently found a violation of Article 3 on account of an applicant's detention in overcrowded conditions in the same detention facilities and approximately at the same time (see Benediktov, cited above, §§ 31-41, Igor Ivanov v. Russia, no. 34000/02, §§ 16-18, and §§ 30-41, 7 June 2007; and Sudarkov v. Russia, no. 3130/03, §§ 40-51, 10 July 2008).
• EGMR, 28.03.1990 - 11968/86

  B. ./. Österreich

  Auszug aus EGMR, 05.03.2009 - 39420/03

  After that date his detention no longer fell within the ambit of Article 5 § 1 (c), but within the scope of Article 5 § 1 (a) of the Convention as the lawful detention after conviction by a competent court; (see B. v. Austria, judgment of 28 March 1990, Series A no. 175, pp. 14-16, §§ 36-39).

• EGMR, 22.05.2012 - 5826/03

  IDALOV c. RUSSIE

  Il invoque en outre des constats établis par la Cour dans des affaires antérieures quant aux conditions de détention dans le même établissement, à savoir la maison d'arrêt no IZ-77/2 (Skachkov c. Russie, no 25432/05, § 24, 7 octobre 2010 ; Bychkov c. Russie, no 39420/03, § 18, 5 mars 2009 ; et Ilyadi c. Russie, no 6642/05, § 20, 5 mai 2011).