Rechtsprechung
| EGMR, 05.03.2013 - 37571/05 |
Zitiervorschläge
Tipp: Um den Kurzlink (hier: https://dejure.org/2013,2991) schnell in die Zwischenablage zu kopieren, können Sie die Tastenkombination Alt + R verwenden - auch ohne diesen Bereich zu öffnen.
Volltextveröffentlichung
- Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte
A. AND B. v. MONTENEGRO
Art. 35, Art. 35 Abs. 1, Art. 41, Protokoll Nr. 1 Art. 1, Protokoll Nr. 1 Art. 1 Abs. 1 MRK
Remainder inadmissible Violation of Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 - Protection of property (Article 1 para. 1 of Protocol No. 1 - Peaceful enjoyment of possessions Possessions) Pecuniary damage - award Non-pecuniary damage - award (englisch)
Sonstiges (2)
- Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte (Verfahrensmitteilung)
A. and B. v. Montenegro
- Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte (Verfahrensmitteilung)
[ENG]
Verfahrensgang
- EGMR, 05.03.2013 - 37571/05
- EGMR, 11.06.2015 - 37571/05
Wird zitiert von ... (0) Neu Zitiert selbst (3)
- EGMR, 16.02.2000 - 27798/95
AMANN c. SUISSE
Auszug aus EGMR, 05.03.2013 - 37571/05
According to the Court's established case-law, the expression "in accordance with the law" requires that the impugned measure should have some basis in domestic law, and it also refers to the quality of the law in question, requiring that it should be accessible to the person concerned and foreseeable as to its effects (see Kuric and Others v. Slovenia [GC], no. 26828/06, § 341, ECHR 2012 (extracts); see also Amann v. Switzerland [GC], no. 27798/95, § 50, ECHR 2000-II; Slivenko v. Latvia [GC], no. 48321/99, § 100, ECHR 2003-X). - EGMR, 22.05.2001 - 33592/96
BAUMANN v. FRANCE
Auszug aus EGMR, 05.03.2013 - 37571/05
Lastly, it should be reiterated that, although there may be exceptions justified by particular circumstances of a case, the assessment of whether domestic remedies have been exhausted is normally carried out with reference to the date on which the application was lodged with the Court (see Baumann v. France, no. 33592/96, § 47, ECHR 2001-V (extracts)). - EGMR, 06.11.1980 - 7654/76
VAN OOSTERWIJCK c. BELGIQUE
Auszug aus EGMR, 05.03.2013 - 37571/05
It has further recognised that the rule of exhaustion is neither absolute nor capable of being applied automatically; in reviewing whether it has been observed it is essential to have regard to the particular circumstances of each individual case (see Van Oosterwijck v. Belgium, 6 November 1980, Series A no. 40, § 35).