Rechtsprechung
| EGMR, 05.06.2007 - 17721/02 |
Zitiervorschläge
Tipp: Um den Kurzlink (hier: https://dejure.org/2007,64827) schnell in die Zwischenablage zu kopieren, können Sie die Tastenkombination Alt + R verwenden - auch ohne diesen Bereich zu öffnen.
Volltextveröffentlichung
- Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte
HÜRRIYET YILMAZ v. TURKEY
Art. 3 MRK
Violation of Art. 3 (englisch)
Wird zitiert von ... (0) Neu Zitiert selbst (5)
- EGMR, 28.07.1999 - 25803/94
Zur "Einzelfallprüfung" und "geltungszeitlichen Interpretation" im Rahmen des …
Auszug aus EGMR, 05.06.2007 - 17721/02
It is incumbent on the State to provide a plausible explanation of how the injuries were caused, failing which a clear issue arises under Article 3 of the Convention (Selmouni v. France [GC], no. 25803/94, § 87, ECHR 1999-V, and Ribitsch v. Austria, judgment of 4 December 1995, Series A no. 336, p. 26, § 34). - EGMR, 06.04.2000 - 26772/95
LABITA c. ITALIE
Auszug aus EGMR, 05.06.2007 - 17721/02
Such proof may, however, follow from the coexistence of sufficiently strong, clear and concordant inferences or of similar unrebutted presumptions of fact (see, Labita v. Italy [GC], no. 26772/95, § 121, ECHR 2000-IV). - EGMR, 01.07.2004 - 39812/98
BAKBAK c. TURQUIE
Auszug aus EGMR, 05.06.2007 - 17721/02
The Court has held on many occasions that, where a person is injured while in detention or otherwise under the control of the police, any such injury will give rise to a strong presumption that the person was subjected to ill-treatment (Matko v. Slovenia, no. 43393/98, § 99, 2 November 2006, and Bakbak v. Turkey, no. 39812/98, § 47, 1 July 2004). - EGMR, 02.11.2006 - 43393/98
MATKO v. SLOVENIA
Auszug aus EGMR, 05.06.2007 - 17721/02
The Court has held on many occasions that, where a person is injured while in detention or otherwise under the control of the police, any such injury will give rise to a strong presumption that the person was subjected to ill-treatment (Matko v. Slovenia, no. 43393/98, § 99, 2 November 2006, and Bakbak v. Turkey, no. 39812/98, § 47, 1 July 2004). - EGMR, 04.12.1995 - 18896/91
RIBITSCH c. AUTRICHE
Auszug aus EGMR, 05.06.2007 - 17721/02
It is incumbent on the State to provide a plausible explanation of how the injuries were caused, failing which a clear issue arises under Article 3 of the Convention (Selmouni v. France [GC], no. 25803/94, § 87, ECHR 1999-V, and Ribitsch v. Austria, judgment of 4 December 1995, Series A no. 336, p. 26, § 34).