Rechtsprechung
EGMR, 05.06.2012 - 28523/03 |
Zitiervorschläge
Tipp: Um den Kurzlink (hier: https://dejure.org/2012,16271) schnell in die Zwischenablage zu kopieren, können Sie die Tastenkombination Alt + R verwenden - auch ohne diesen Bereich zu öffnen.
Volltextveröffentlichung
- Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte
ADEMOVIC v. TURKEY
Art. 6, Art. 6 Abs. 1, Protokoll Nr. 1 Art. 1, Protokoll Nr. 1 Art. 1 Abs. 1 MRK
Violation of Article 6 - Right to a fair trial (Article 6 - Civil proceedings Article 6-1 - Access to court) Violation of Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 - Protection of property (Article 1 para. 1 of Protocol No. 1 - General principles of international law) ...
Sonstiges
- Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte (Verfahrensmitteilung)
[ENG]
Wird zitiert von ... (0) Neu Zitiert selbst (5)
- EGMR, 22.03.1995 - 18580/91
QUINN c. FRANCE
Auszug aus EGMR, 05.06.2012 - 28523/03
The Court firstly recalls that Article 5 § 3 refers only to paragraph 1 (c) of Article 5. It does not therefore apply to detention with a view to extradition within the meaning of Article 5 § 1 (f) (see Quinn v. France, 22 March 1995, § 53, Series A no. 311). - EGMR, 28.03.2000 - 28358/95
BARANOWSKI v. POLAND
Auszug aus EGMR, 05.06.2012 - 28523/03
"Quality of law" in this sense implies that where a national law authorises deprivation of liberty it must be sufficiently accessible, precise and foreseeable in its application, in order to avoid all risk of arbitrariness (see Khudoyorov v. Russia, no. 6847/02, § 125, 2005-X (extracts); Jecius v. Lithuania, no. 34578/97, § 56, ECHR 2000-IX; and Baranowski v. Poland, no. 28358/95, §§ 50-52, ECHR 2000-III). - EGMR, 31.07.2000 - 34578/97
JECIUS v. LITHUANIA
Auszug aus EGMR, 05.06.2012 - 28523/03
"Quality of law" in this sense implies that where a national law authorises deprivation of liberty it must be sufficiently accessible, precise and foreseeable in its application, in order to avoid all risk of arbitrariness (see Khudoyorov v. Russia, no. 6847/02, § 125, 2005-X (extracts); Jecius v. Lithuania, no. 34578/97, § 56, ECHR 2000-IX; and Baranowski v. Poland, no. 28358/95, §§ 50-52, ECHR 2000-III). - EGMR, 08.11.2005 - 6847/02
KHOUDOÏOROV c. RUSSIE
Auszug aus EGMR, 05.06.2012 - 28523/03
"Quality of law" in this sense implies that where a national law authorises deprivation of liberty it must be sufficiently accessible, precise and foreseeable in its application, in order to avoid all risk of arbitrariness (see Khudoyorov v. Russia, no. 6847/02, § 125, 2005-X (extracts); Jecius v. Lithuania, no. 34578/97, § 56, ECHR 2000-IX; and Baranowski v. Poland, no. 28358/95, §§ 50-52, ECHR 2000-III). - EGMR, 06.12.2011 - 45875/06
RAFIG ALIYEV v. AZERBAIJAN
Auszug aus EGMR, 05.06.2012 - 28523/03
The Court reiterates that, while Article 5 § 4 of the Convention, does not impose an obligation to address every argument contained in the detainee's submissions, the judge, who is examining appeals against pre-trial detention, must take into account concrete facts which are referred to by the detainee and are capable of casting doubt on the existence of those conditions essential for the "lawfulness", for the Convention purposes, of the deprivation of liberty (see Nikolova v. Bulgaria [GC], no. 31195/96, § 61, ECHR 1999-II, and Rafig Aliyev v. Azerbaijan, no. 45875/06, § 109, 6 December 2011).