Rechtsprechung
   EGMR, 05.06.2012 - 28523/03   

Zitiervorschläge
https://dejure.org/2012,16271
EGMR, 05.06.2012 - 28523/03 (https://dejure.org/2012,16271)
EGMR, Entscheidung vom 05.06.2012 - 28523/03 (https://dejure.org/2012,16271)
EGMR, Entscheidung vom 05. Juni 2012 - 28523/03 (https://dejure.org/2012,16271)
Tipp: Um den Kurzlink (hier: https://dejure.org/2012,16271) schnell in die Zwischenablage zu kopieren, können Sie die Tastenkombination Alt + R verwenden - auch ohne diesen Bereich zu öffnen.

Volltextveröffentlichung

  • Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

    ADEMOVIC v. TURKEY

    Art. 6, Art. 6 Abs. 1, Protokoll Nr. 1 Art. 1, Protokoll Nr. 1 Art. 1 Abs. 1 MRK
    Violation of Article 6 - Right to a fair trial (Article 6 - Civil proceedings Article 6-1 - Access to court) Violation of Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 - Protection of property (Article 1 para. 1 of Protocol No. 1 - General principles of international law) ...

Sonstiges

 
Sortierung



Kontextvorschau





Hinweis: Klicken Sie auf das Sprechblasensymbol, um eine Kontextvorschau im Fließtext zu sehen. Um alle zu sehen, genügt ein Doppelklick.

Wird zitiert von ... (0)Neu Zitiert selbst (5)

  • EGMR, 22.03.1995 - 18580/91

    QUINN c. FRANCE

    Auszug aus EGMR, 05.06.2012 - 28523/03
    The Court firstly recalls that Article 5 § 3 refers only to paragraph 1 (c) of Article 5. It does not therefore apply to detention with a view to extradition within the meaning of Article 5 § 1 (f) (see Quinn v. France, 22 March 1995, § 53, Series A no. 311).
  • EGMR, 28.03.2000 - 28358/95

    BARANOWSKI v. POLAND

    Auszug aus EGMR, 05.06.2012 - 28523/03
    "Quality of law" in this sense implies that where a national law authorises deprivation of liberty it must be sufficiently accessible, precise and foreseeable in its application, in order to avoid all risk of arbitrariness (see Khudoyorov v. Russia, no. 6847/02, § 125, 2005-X (extracts); Jecius v. Lithuania, no. 34578/97, § 56, ECHR 2000-IX; and Baranowski v. Poland, no. 28358/95, §§ 50-52, ECHR 2000-III).
  • EGMR, 31.07.2000 - 34578/97

    JECIUS v. LITHUANIA

    Auszug aus EGMR, 05.06.2012 - 28523/03
    "Quality of law" in this sense implies that where a national law authorises deprivation of liberty it must be sufficiently accessible, precise and foreseeable in its application, in order to avoid all risk of arbitrariness (see Khudoyorov v. Russia, no. 6847/02, § 125, 2005-X (extracts); Jecius v. Lithuania, no. 34578/97, § 56, ECHR 2000-IX; and Baranowski v. Poland, no. 28358/95, §§ 50-52, ECHR 2000-III).
  • EGMR, 08.11.2005 - 6847/02

    KHOUDOÏOROV c. RUSSIE

    Auszug aus EGMR, 05.06.2012 - 28523/03
    "Quality of law" in this sense implies that where a national law authorises deprivation of liberty it must be sufficiently accessible, precise and foreseeable in its application, in order to avoid all risk of arbitrariness (see Khudoyorov v. Russia, no. 6847/02, § 125, 2005-X (extracts); Jecius v. Lithuania, no. 34578/97, § 56, ECHR 2000-IX; and Baranowski v. Poland, no. 28358/95, §§ 50-52, ECHR 2000-III).
  • EGMR, 06.12.2011 - 45875/06

    RAFIG ALIYEV v. AZERBAIJAN

    Auszug aus EGMR, 05.06.2012 - 28523/03
    The Court reiterates that, while Article 5 § 4 of the Convention, does not impose an obligation to address every argument contained in the detainee's submissions, the judge, who is examining appeals against pre-trial detention, must take into account concrete facts which are referred to by the detainee and are capable of casting doubt on the existence of those conditions essential for the "lawfulness", for the Convention purposes, of the deprivation of liberty (see Nikolova v. Bulgaria [GC], no. 31195/96, § 61, ECHR 1999-II, and Rafig Aliyev v. Azerbaijan, no. 45875/06, § 109, 6 December 2011).
Haben Sie eine Ergänzung? Oder haben Sie einen Fehler gefunden? Schreiben Sie uns.
Sie können auswählen (Maus oder Pfeiltasten):
(Liste aufgrund Ihrer bisherigen Eingabe)
Komplette Übersicht