Rechtsprechung
   EGMR, 05.06.2012 - 55822/10   

Sie müssen eingeloggt sein, um diese Funktion zu nutzen.

Sie haben noch kein Nutzerkonto? In weniger als einer Minute ist es eingerichtet und Sie können sofort diese und weitere kostenlose Zusatzfunktionen nutzen.

| | Was ist die Merkfunktion?
Ablegen in
Benachrichtigen, wenn:




 
Alle auswählen
 

Zitiervorschläge

https://dejure.org/2012,15738
EGMR, 05.06.2012 - 55822/10 (https://dejure.org/2012,15738)
EGMR, Entscheidung vom 05.06.2012 - 55822/10 (https://dejure.org/2012,15738)
EGMR, Entscheidung vom 05. Juni 2012 - 55822/10 (https://dejure.org/2012,15738)
Tipp: Um den Kurzlink (hier: https://dejure.org/2012,15738) schnell in die Zwischenablage zu kopieren, können Sie die Tastenkombination Alt + R verwenden - auch ohne diesen Bereich zu öffnen.

Volltextveröffentlichung

  • Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

    SHAKUROV v. RUSSIA

    Art. 3, Art. 5, Art. 5 Abs. 1, Art. 5 Abs. 1 Buchst. f, Art. 5 Abs. 4, Art. 8, Art. 8 Abs. 1, Art. 8 Abs. 2, Art. 35, Art. 41 MRK
    Remainder inadmissible No violation of Article 3 - Prohibition of torture (Article 3 - Extradition) (Conditional) (Uzbekistan) No violation of Article 5 - Right to liberty and security (Article 5-1 - Lawful arrest or detention Article 5-1-f - Extradition) Violation of Article 5 - Right to liberty and security (Article 5-4 - Review of lawfulness of detention Speediness of review) No violation of Article 8 - Right to respect for private and family life (Article 8-1 - Respect for family life) (Conditional) Non-pecuniary damage - award (Article 41 - Non-pecuniary damage) (englisch)

Sonstiges




Kontextvorschau:





Hinweis: Klicken Sie auf das Sprechblasensymbol, um eine Kontextvorschau im Fließtext zu sehen. Um alle zu sehen, genügt ein Doppelklick.

Wird zitiert von ... (26)  

  • EGMR, 15.10.2015 - 40081/14

    Russland verurteilt - Keine Zwangsausweisung nach Syrien

    The Court regards the relevant information submitted by applicants to the immigration authorities as an integral part justifying their claims of a fear of treatment in breach of Article 3 (see Y. v. Russia, no. 20113/07, §§ 87-88, 4 December 2008; Shakurov v. Russia, no. 55822/10, §§ 132-13, 5 June 2012; and Kozhayev v. Russia, no. 60045/10, §§ 85-87, 5 June 2012).
  • EGMR, 25.07.2013 - 11082/06

    Chodorkowski: Moskauer Prozesse sind unfair

    The Court would not be concerned, to the same extent, with the speediness of the proceedings before the court of appeal, if the detention order under review was imposed by a court and on condition that the procedure followed by that court had a judicial character and afforded to the detainee the appropriate procedural guarantees" (see Shakurov v. Russia, no. 55822/10, § 179, 5 June 2012).
  • EGMR, 18.04.2013 - 67474/11

    AZIMOV v. RUSSIA

    The Court will examine the merits of the applicant's complaint under Article 3 in the light of the applicable general principles, as reiterated in Saadi v. Italy [GC], (no. 37201/06, §§ 124-136, ECHR 2008), and Shakurov v. Russia (no. 55822/10, §§ 118-128, 5 June 2012).
  • EGMR, 05.02.2013 - 67286/10

    ZOKHIDOV v. RUSSIA

    At the same time, the Court reiterates that it has consistently emphasised that reference to a general problem concerning human rights observance in a particular country is normally insufficient to bar extradition (see Kamyshev v. Ukraine, no. 3990/06, § 44, 20 May 2010, and Shakurov v. Russia, no. 55822/10, § 135, 5 June 2012).
  • EGMR, 19.02.2013 - 39786/09

    YEFIMOVA v. RUSSIA

    Bearing in mind this assessment of the situation, and whilst not underestimating the seriousness of the concerns expressed by such authoritative sources as, for instance, the UN Committee Against Torture and the UN Human Rights Committee, the Court nonetheless reiterates that it has consistently emphasised that reference to a general problem concerning human rights observance in a particular country is normally insufficient to bar extradition (see Kamyshev v. Ukraine, no. 3990/06, § 44, 20 May 2010, and Shakurov v. Russia, no. 55822/10, § 135, 5 June 2012).
  • EGMR, 10.07.2014 - 50552/13

    RAKHIMOV v. RUSSIA

    The Court further observes that, in any event, even where the purpose of detention is legitimate, its length should not exceed that reasonably required for the purpose pursued (see Azimov, cited above, § 166, and Shakurov v. Russia, no. 55822/10, § 162, 5 June 2012).
  • EGMR, 28.05.2014 - 62892/12

    AKRAM KARIMOV v. RUSSIA

    Having regard to the above, the Court concludes that throughout the period in question the extradition proceedings were in progress and complied with domestic law (see Shakurov v. Russia, no. 55822/10, § 170, 5 June 2012, and Sidikovy v. Russia, no. 73455/11, § 165, 20 June 2013).
  • EGMR, 20.06.2013 - 73455/11

    SIDIKOVY v. RUSSIA

    Nonetheless, it emphasises that reference to a general situation concerning the observation of human rights in a particular country is normally insufficient to bar extradition (see Kamyshev v. Ukraine, no. 3990/06, § 44, 20 May 2010, and Shakurov v. Russia, no. 55822/10, § 135, 5 June 2012).
  • EGMR, 16.10.2012 - 27843/11

    NIYAZOV v. RUSSIA

    The Court concludes that, in the circumstances of the present case, the delay of twenty days in examining the appeal against the detention order of 27 December 2010 is incompatible with the "speediness" requirement of Article 5 § 4 (see, for comparison, Karimov, cited above, § 127, Khudyakova v. Russia, no. 13476/04, § 99, 8 January 2009, and, as a recent authority, Shakurov v. Russia, no. 55822/10, §§ 184-187, 5 June 2012).
  • EGMR, 12.12.2013 - 77658/11

    LATIPOV c. RUSSIE

    Toutefois, la Cour réitère que le principe selon lequel la simple référence à un problème général pouvant exister quant au respect des droits de l'homme dans un pays ne suffit pas pour interdire toute extradition vers ce pays (Kamyshev c. Ukraine, no 3990/06, § 44, 20 May 2010, et Shakurov c. Russie, no 55822/10, § 135, 5 juin 2012).
  • EGMR, 07.11.2013 - 43165/10

    ERMAKOV v. RUSSIA

  • EGMR, 05.02.2013 - 30225/11

    BAKOYEV v. RUSSIA

  • EGMR, 26.02.2015 - 66373/13

    KHALIKOV v. RUSSIA

  • EGMR, 15.01.2015 - 68900/13

    ESHONKULOV v. RUSSIA

  • EGMR, 27.11.2012 - 5515/09

    HORVÁTH v. SLOVAKIA

  • EGMR, 27.11.2014 - 47593/10

    KHOMULLO v. UKRAINE

  • EGMR, 17.04.2014 - 20110/13

    ISMAILOV v. RUSSIA

  • EGMR, 26.06.2014 - 34742/13

    EGAMBERDIYEV v. RUSSIA

  • EGMR, 26.06.2014 - 41970/11

    SHCHERBINA v. RUSSIA

  • EGMR, 14.02.2017 - 55214/15

    MARTINS O'NEILL PEDROSA v. PORTUGAL

  • EGMR, 14.01.2014 - 64528/09

    SCHVARC v. SLOVAKIA

  • EGMR, 05.12.2017 - 40755/16

    B.T. v. RUSSIA

  • EGMR, 06.01.2015 - 30541/12

    VLAS ET AUTRES c. ROUMANIE

  • EGMR, 21.01.2014 - 63800/10

    ALOJZ v. SLOVAKIA

  • EGMR, 11.06.2013 - 15594/11

    KETCHUM c. ROUMANIE

  • EGMR - 44015/07

    BASHIN AND CHEKUNOV v. RUSSIA and 2 other applications

Haben Sie eine Ergänzung? Oder haben Sie einen Fehler gefunden? Schreiben Sie uns.
Neu: Die Merklistenfunktion erreichen Sie nun über das Lesezeichen oben.
Sie können auswählen (Maus oder Pfeiltasten):
(Liste aufgrund Ihrer bisherigen Eingabe)
Komplette Übersicht