Rechtsprechung
| EGMR, 05.06.2014 - 5741/10 |
Zitiervorschläge
Tipp: Um den Kurzlink (hier: https://dejure.org/2014,12029) schnell in die Zwischenablage zu kopieren, können Sie die Tastenkombination Alt + R verwenden - auch ohne diesen Bereich zu öffnen.
Volltextveröffentlichung
- Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte
SEMIC v. SLOVENIA
Art. 3, Art. 13 MRK
Violation of Article 3 - Prohibition of torture (Article 3 - Degrading treatment Inhuman treatment) (Substantive aspect) No violation of Article 3 - Prohibition of torture (Article 3 - Degrading treatment Violation of Article 13 - Right to an effective remedy ...
Sonstiges
- Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte (Verfahrensmitteilung)
Semic v. Slovenia
Wird zitiert von ... (0) Neu Zitiert selbst (3)
- EGMR, 08.07.1999 - 23536/94
Strafrechtliche Verfolgung auf Grund der Veröffentlichung eines Buches mit …
Auszug aus EGMR, 05.06.2014 - 5741/10
23536/94 and 24408/94, § 98, ECHR 1999-IV). - EGMR, 19.04.2001 - 28524/95
PEERS v. GREECE
Auszug aus EGMR, 05.06.2014 - 5741/10
Having regard to the cumulative effects of these conditions of the applicant's detention, the Court considers, as in Praznik, that the hardship he endured in the period of 9 months and 28 days appears to have exceeded the unavoidable level inherent in detention, and finds that the resulting suffering went beyond the threshold of severity under Article 3 of the Convention and that the conditions of detention in which the applicant was held then were contrary to Article 3 of the Convention (see, Praznik, cited above, § 21 and mutatis mutandis, Szél v. Hungary, no. 30221/06, § 18, 7 June 2011, and Peers v. Greece, no. 28524/95, § 75, ECHR 2001-III). - EGMR, 07.06.2011 - 30221/06
SZEL v. HUNGARY
Auszug aus EGMR, 05.06.2014 - 5741/10
Having regard to the cumulative effects of these conditions of the applicant's detention, the Court considers, as in Praznik, that the hardship he endured in the period of 9 months and 28 days appears to have exceeded the unavoidable level inherent in detention, and finds that the resulting suffering went beyond the threshold of severity under Article 3 of the Convention and that the conditions of detention in which the applicant was held then were contrary to Article 3 of the Convention (see, Praznik, cited above, § 21 and mutatis mutandis, Szél v. Hungary, no. 30221/06, § 18, 7 June 2011, and Peers v. Greece, no. 28524/95, § 75, ECHR 2001-III).