Rechtsprechung
| EGMR, 05.06.2018 - 74441/14 |
Zitiervorschläge
Tipp: Um den Kurzlink (hier: https://dejure.org/2018,20081) schnell in die Zwischenablage zu kopieren, können Sie die Tastenkombination Alt + R verwenden - auch ohne diesen Bereich zu öffnen.
Volltextveröffentlichung
- Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte
BOTNARI v. THE REPUBLIC OF MOLDOVA
Violation of Article 3 - Prohibition of torture (Article 3 - Degrading treatment) (Substantive aspect);Violation of Article 13+3 - Right to an effective remedy (Article 13 - Effective remedy) (Article 3 - Prohibition of torture;Degrading treatment) (englisch)
Sonstiges
- Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte (Verfahrensmitteilung)
BOTNARI v. THE REPUBLIC OF MOLDOVA
Verfahrensgang
- EGMR, 05.06.2018 - 74441/14
- EGMR, 01.10.2019 - 74441/14
- EGMR, 04.06.2020 - 74441/14
Wird zitiert von ... (0) Neu Zitiert selbst (4)
- EGMR, 10.01.2012 - 42525/07
ANANYEV AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA
Auszug aus EGMR, 05.06.2018 - 74441/14
It reiterates in particular that a serious lack of space in a prison cell weighs heavily as a factor to be taken into account for the purpose of establishing whether the detention conditions described are "degrading" from the point of view of Article 3 and may disclose a violation, both alone or taken together with other shortcomings (see, amongst many authorities, Karalevicius v. Lithuania, no. 53254/99, §§ 39, 7 April 2005, Ananyev and Others, nos. 42525/07 and 60800/08, §§ 139-165, 10 January 2012, §§ 145-147 and 149, and Mursic v. Croatia [GC], no. 7334/13, § 104, ECHR 2016). - EGMR, 23.02.2017 - 43395/09
DE TOMMASO v. ITALY
Auszug aus EGMR, 05.06.2018 - 74441/14
Therefore, although Contracting States are afforded some discretion as to the manner in which they conform to their obligations under this provision, there must be a domestic remedy allowing the competent national authority both to deal with the substance of the relevant Convention complaint and to grant appropriate relief (see De Tommaso v. Italy [GC], no. 43395/09, § 179, ECHR 2017 (extracts)). - EGMR, 28.01.1994 - 17549/90
HURTADO c. SUISSE
Auszug aus EGMR, 05.06.2018 - 74441/14
The Court reiterates that, although Article 3 of the Convention cannot be construed as laying down a general obligation to release detainees on health grounds, it nonetheless imposes an obligation on the State to protect the physical well-being of persons deprived of their liberty, for example by providing them with the requisite medical assistance (see Hurtado v. Switzerland, judgment of 28 January 1994, Series A no. 280-A, opinion of the Commission, pp. 15-16, § 79). - EGMR, 13.07.2006 - 26853/04
POPOV v. RUSSIA
Auszug aus EGMR, 05.06.2018 - 74441/14
The Court reiterates that the State must ensure that a person is detained in conditions which are compatible with respect for human dignity, that the manner and method of the execution of the measure do not subject him or her to distress or hardship of an intensity exceeding the unavoidable level of suffering inherent in detention and that, given the practical demands of imprisonment, his or her health and well-being are adequately secured (see Kudla v. Poland [GC], no. 30210/96, §§ 92-94, ECHR 2000-XI, and Popov v. Russia, no. 26853/04, § 208, 13 July 2006).