Rechtsprechung
| EGMR, 05.07.2007 - 14349/03 |
Zitiervorschläge
Tipp: Um den Kurzlink (hier: https://dejure.org/2007,69149) schnell in die Zwischenablage zu kopieren, können Sie die Tastenkombination Alt + R verwenden - auch ohne diesen Bereich zu öffnen.
Volltextveröffentlichung
Wird zitiert von ... (0) Neu Zitiert selbst (3)
- EGMR, 27.02.2001 - 35237/97
ADOUD ET BOSONI c. FRANCE
Auszug aus EGMR, 05.07.2007 - 14349/03
Thus, proceedings for leave to appeal or proceedings involving only questions of law, as opposed to questions of fact, may comply with the requirements of Article 6 even where the appellant was not given an opportunity of being heard in person by the appeal or cassation court (see Meftah and Others v. France [GC], nos. 32911/96, 35237/97 and 34595/97, § 41, ECHR 2002-VII, and the references cited therein). - EGMR, 12.04.2001 - 41354/98
ARVELAKIS v. GREECE
Auszug aus EGMR, 05.07.2007 - 14349/03
According to the Court's case-law, an applicant is entitled to reimbursement of his costs and expenses only in so far as it has been shown that these have been actually and necessarily incurred and were reasonable as to quantum (see Kostovska v. the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia, cited above, § 62; Arvelakis v. Greece, no. 41354/98, § 34, 12 April 2001; Nikolova v. Bulgaria [GC], no. 31195/96, § 79, ECHR 1999-II). - EGMR, 15.07.1982 - 8130/78
Eckle ./. Deutschland
Auszug aus EGMR, 05.07.2007 - 14349/03
It further accepts that the statutory interest could be regarded as a compensation for the late payment and did not constitute any acknowledgment, whether explicit or implicit, on the part of the national authorities that the applicant's case had not been heard within a reasonable time (see, mutatis mutandis, Eckle v. Germany, judgment of 15 July 1982, Series A no. 51, § 66).