Rechtsprechung
   EGMR, 05.07.2007 - 27866/02   

Zitiervorschläge
https://dejure.org/2007,64938
EGMR, 05.07.2007 - 27866/02 (https://dejure.org/2007,64938)
EGMR, Entscheidung vom 05.07.2007 - 27866/02 (https://dejure.org/2007,64938)
EGMR, Entscheidung vom 05. Juli 2007 - 27866/02 (https://dejure.org/2007,64938)
Tipp: Um den Kurzlink (hier: https://dejure.org/2007,64938) schnell in die Zwischenablage zu kopieren, können Sie die Tastenkombination Alt + R verwenden - auch ohne diesen Bereich zu öffnen.

Volltextveröffentlichung

 
Sortierung



Kontextvorschau





Hinweis: Klicken Sie auf das Sprechblasensymbol, um eine Kontextvorschau im Fließtext zu sehen. Um alle zu sehen, genügt ein Doppelklick.

Wird zitiert von ... (2)Neu Zitiert selbst (4)

  • EGMR, 21.01.1999 - 30544/96

    GARCÍA RUIZ v. SPAIN

    Auszug aus EGMR, 05.07.2007 - 27866/02
    It is not the function of the Court to deal with errors of fact or law allegedly committed by a national court unless and in so far as they may have infringed rights and freedoms protected by the Convention (see García Ruiz v. Spain [GC], no. 30544/96, § 28, 29, ECHR 1999-I).
  • EGMR, 10.12.1982 - 7604/76

    FOTI ET AUTRES c. ITALIE

    Auszug aus EGMR, 05.07.2007 - 27866/02
    In assessing the reasonableness of the time that elapsed after that date, account must be taken of the state of proceedings on 10 April 1997 (see Styranowski v. Poland, no. 28616/95, § 46, ECHR 1998-VIII; Foti and Others v. Italy, judgment of 10 December 1982, Series A no. 56, p. 18, § 53).
  • EGMR, 12.07.1988 - 10862/84

    SCHENK c. SUISSE

    Auszug aus EGMR, 05.07.2007 - 27866/02
    Moreover, while Article 6 of the Convention guarantees the right to a fair hearing, it does not lay down any rules on the admissibility of evidence or the way it should be assessed, which are therefore primarily matters for regulation by national law and the national courts (see Schenk v. Switzerland, judgment of 12 July 1988, Series A no. 140, p. 29, §§ 45-46).
  • EGMR, 28.06.1990 - 11761/85

    Obermeier ./. Österreich

    Auszug aus EGMR, 05.07.2007 - 27866/02
    Moreover, the Court notes that the domestic law (see section 408 of the Civil Proceedings Act above) and the Court's jurisprudence (see, mutatis mutandis, Ruotolo v. Italy, judgment of 27 February 1992, Series A no. 230-D, § 17; Obermeier v. Austria, judgment of 28 June 1990, Series A no. 179, § 72) required employment-related disputes to be conducted with a special diligence.
  • EGMR, 27.11.2012 - 25248/05

    NAUMOSKI v.

    However, it notes that the Court's jurisprudence (see Ziberi v. the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia, no. 27866/02, § 47, 5 July 2007) require employment-related disputes to be conducted with special diligence.
  • EGMR, 24.04.2014 - 10718/05

    DUSKO IVANOVSKI v.

    This involves an examination of the "unlawfulness" in question (see Lisica, cited above, § 48; Gorgievski v. the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia, no. 18002/02, § 47, 16 July 2009; Ziberi v. the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia, no. 27866/02, § 30, 5 July 2007; and Khan v. the United Kingdom, no. 35394/97, § 34, ECHR 2000-V).
Haben Sie eine Ergänzung? Oder haben Sie einen Fehler gefunden? Schreiben Sie uns.
Sie können auswählen (Maus oder Pfeiltasten):
(Liste aufgrund Ihrer bisherigen Eingabe)
Komplette Übersicht