Rechtsprechung
| EGMR, 05.07.2011 - 22006/07 |
Zitiervorschläge
Tipp: Um den Kurzlink (hier: https://dejure.org/2011,56663) schnell in die Zwischenablage zu kopieren, können Sie die Tastenkombination Alt + R verwenden - auch ohne diesen Bereich zu öffnen.
Volltextveröffentlichung
- Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte
MIHAL v. SLOVAKIA
Verfahrensgang
- EGMR, 05.07.2011 - 22006/07
- EGMR, 30.04.2013 - 22006/07
- EGMR - 22006/07
Wird zitiert von ... (0) Neu Zitiert selbst (5)
- EGMR, 18.02.1999 - 26083/94
WAITE AND KENNEDY v. GERMANY
Auszug aus EGMR, 05.07.2011 - 22006/07
Thus everyone has the right to have any claim relating to his civil rights and obligations brought before a court or tribunal (see, among many others, Waite and Kennedy v. Germany [GC], no. 26083/94, § 50, ECHR 1999-I). - EGMR, 12.07.2001 - 42527/98
Enteignung eines Gemäldes in Tschechien auf Grund der Benes-Dekrete - …
Auszug aus EGMR, 05.07.2011 - 22006/07
The Court reiterates that the right to a fair hearing, as guaranteed by Article 6 § 1 of the Convention, embodies the "right to a court", one aspect of which is the right of access, that is, the right to institute proceedings before courts in civil matters (see Golder v. the United Kingdom, 21 February 1975, § 36, Series A no. 18; Prince Hans-Adam II of Liechtenstein v. Germany [GC], no. 42527/98, § 43, ECHR 2001-VIII; and Roche v. the United Kingdom [GC], no. 32555/96, § 116, ECHR 2005-X). - EGMR, 19.10.2005 - 32555/96
ROCHE c. ROYAUME-UNI
Auszug aus EGMR, 05.07.2011 - 22006/07
The Court reiterates that the right to a fair hearing, as guaranteed by Article 6 § 1 of the Convention, embodies the "right to a court", one aspect of which is the right of access, that is, the right to institute proceedings before courts in civil matters (see Golder v. the United Kingdom, 21 February 1975, § 36, Series A no. 18; Prince Hans-Adam II of Liechtenstein v. Germany [GC], no. 42527/98, § 43, ECHR 2001-VIII; and Roche v. the United Kingdom [GC], no. 32555/96, § 116, ECHR 2005-X). - EGMR, 28.05.1985 - 8225/78
ASHINGDANE v. THE UNITED KINGDOM
Auszug aus EGMR, 05.07.2011 - 22006/07
Furthermore, a limitation will not be compatible with Article 6 § 1 if it does not pursue a legitimate aim and if there is not a reasonable relationship of proportionality between the means employed and the aim sought to be achieved (see, among many others, Ashingdane v. the United Kingdom, 28 May 1985, § 57, Series A no. 93 and Prince Hans-Adam II of Liechtenstein, cited above, § 44). - EGMR, 21.02.1975 - 4451/70
GOLDER c. ROYAUME-UNI
Auszug aus EGMR, 05.07.2011 - 22006/07
The Court reiterates that the right to a fair hearing, as guaranteed by Article 6 § 1 of the Convention, embodies the "right to a court", one aspect of which is the right of access, that is, the right to institute proceedings before courts in civil matters (see Golder v. the United Kingdom, 21 February 1975, § 36, Series A no. 18; Prince Hans-Adam II of Liechtenstein v. Germany [GC], no. 42527/98, § 43, ECHR 2001-VIII; and Roche v. the United Kingdom [GC], no. 32555/96, § 116, ECHR 2005-X).