Volltextveröffentlichung

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

  JANOWIEC AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA

  Art. 2, Art. 3, Art. 6, Art. 8, Art. 13 MRK
  Partly admissible Partly inadmissible (englisch)

Verfahrensgang

• EGMR, 05.07.2011 - 55508/07, 29520/09
• EGMR, 16.04.2012 - 55508/07
• EGMR, 21.10.2013 - 55508/07

Wird zitiert von ... (0)Neu Zitiert selbst (6)

• EGMR, 03.03.2005 - 54723/00

  BRUDNICKA AND OTHERS v. POLAND

  Auszug aus EGMR, 05.07.2011 - 55508/07

  On the other hand, the Court has held that Article 6 applies under its civil head to rehabilitation proceedings in so far as such proceedings concern the right of the applicants to defend their reputation and that of their deceased relatives (see Brudnicka and Others v. Poland, no. 54723/00, §§ 24-34, ECHR 2005-II; Kurzac v. Poland (dec.), no. 31382/96, 25 May 2000; and also Gradinar v. Moldova, no. 7170/02, §§ 96-98, 8 April 2008).
• EGMR, 09.11.2006 - 7615/02

  IMAKAÏEVA c. RUSSIE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 05.07.2011 - 55508/07

  An additional element contributing to the applicants" suffering had been the authorities" unjustified denial of access to the documents in case no. 159 which could shed light on the fate of their relatives, both at the domestic level and in the proceedings before the Court (here they referred to the Court's findings to the same effect in the case of Imakayeva v. Russia, no. 7615/02, § 165, ECHR 2006-XIII (extracts)).
• EGMR, 12.07.2005 - 64320/01

  Auszug aus EGMR, 05.07.2011 - 55508/07

  41138/98 and 64320/01, ECHR 2005-VII (extracts), and Blecic v. Croatia [GC], no. 59532/00, ECHR 2006-III), they stressed that in the absence of a violation of Article 2 under its substantive limb no procedural obligation to conduct an effective investigation could arise.

 
• EGMR, 17.01.2002 - 32967/96

  CALVELLI ET CIGLIO c. ITALIE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 05.07.2011 - 55508/07

  The applicants submitted that Article 6 was applicable under its civil limb even in the absence of a claim for financial reparation (here they referred to the Court's findings in, among other cases, Perez v. France [GC], no. 47287/99, ECHR 2004-I, and Calvelli and Ciglio v. Italy [GC], no. 32967/96, ECHR 2002-I).
• EGMR, 28.09.1995 - 15346/89

  MASSON AND VAN ZON v. THE NETHERLANDS

  Auszug aus EGMR, 05.07.2011 - 55508/07

  In their view, the applicants possessed no right which could be said, at least on arguable grounds, to be recognised under domestic law (here they referred to Masson and Van Zon v. the Netherlands, 28 September 1995, § 44, Series A no. 327-A).
• EGMR, 08.04.2008 - 7170/02

  GRADINAR v. MOLDOVA

  Auszug aus EGMR, 05.07.2011 - 55508/07

  On the other hand, the Court has held that Article 6 applies under its civil head to rehabilitation proceedings in so far as such proceedings concern the right of the applicants to defend their reputation and that of their deceased relatives (see Brudnicka and Others v. Poland, no. 54723/00, §§ 24-34, ECHR 2005-II; Kurzac v. Poland (dec.), no. 31382/96, 25 May 2000; and also Gradinar v. Moldova, no. 7170/02, §§ 96-98, 8 April 2008).