Volltextveröffentlichung

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

  HUNDE v. THE NETHERLANDS

  Inadmissible (englisch)

Wird zitiert von ... (2)Neu Zitiert selbst (7)

• EGMR - 43441/08 (anhängig)

  [ENG]

  Auszug aus EGMR, 05.07.2016 - 17931/16

  32541/08 and 43441/08, § 113, ECHR 2014 (extracts)).
• EGMR, 07.07.1989 - 14038/88

  Jens Söring

  Auszug aus EGMR, 05.07.2016 - 17931/16

  Furthermore, inherent in the whole of the Convention is a search for a fair balance between the demands of the general interest of the community and the requirements of the protection of the individual's fundamental rights (see Soering v. the United Kingdom, 7 July 1989, § 89, Series A no. 161).
• EGMR, 18.10.2006 - 46410/99

  Rechtssache ÜNER gegen die NIEDERLANDE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 05.07.2016 - 17931/16

  In that regard, the Court reiterates that Contracting States have the right, as a matter of well-established international law and subject to their treaty obligations, to control the entry, residence and expulsion of aliens (see, for example, Hirsi Jamaa and Others v. Italy [GC], no. 27765/09, § 113, ECHR 2012; Üner v. the Netherlands [GC], no. 46410/99, § 54, ECHR 2006-XII; Abdulaziz, Cabales and Balkandali v. the United Kingdom, 28 May 1985, § 67, Series A no. 94; and Boujlifa v. France, 21 October 1997, § 42, Reports 1997-VI).

 
• EGMR, 09.10.1979 - 6289/73

  AIREY v. IRELAND

  Auszug aus EGMR, 05.07.2016 - 17931/16

  Whilst the Convention sets forth what are essentially civil and political rights, many of them have implications of a social or economic nature (see Airey v. Ireland, 9 October 1979, § 26, Series A no. 32).
• EGMR, 06.04.2000 - 26772/95

  LABITA c. ITALIE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 05.07.2016 - 17931/16

  Article 3 of the Convention enshrines one of the most fundamental values of democratic societies and prohibits in absolute terms torture and inhuman degrading treatment or punishment irrespective of the circumstances and of the victim's conduct (see, among many authorities, Labita v. Italy [GC], no. 26772/95, § 119, ECHR 2000-IV).
• EGMR, 05.04.2011 - 2974/05

  VASYUKOV v. RUSSIA

  Auszug aus EGMR, 05.07.2016 - 17931/16

  However, even in the absence of these aspects, where treatment humiliates or debases an individual, showing a lack of respect for or diminishing his or her human dignity, or arouses feelings of fear, anguish or inferiority capable of breaking an individual's moral and physical resistance, it may be characterised as degrading and also fall within the prohibition set forth in Article 3 (see, among other authorities, Vasyukov v. Russia, no. 2974/05, § 59, 5 April 2011; Gäfgen v. Germany [GC], no. 22978/05, § 89, ECHR 2010; Svinarenko and Slyadnev, cited above, § 114; and Georgia v. Russia (I), cited above, § 192).
• EGMR, 28.05.1985 - 9214/80

  ABDULAZIZ, CABALES AND BALKANDALI v. THE UNITED KINGDOM

  Auszug aus EGMR, 05.07.2016 - 17931/16

  In that regard, the Court reiterates that Contracting States have the right, as a matter of well-established international law and subject to their treaty obligations, to control the entry, residence and expulsion of aliens (see, for example, Hirsi Jamaa and Others v. Italy [GC], no. 27765/09, § 113, ECHR 2012; Üner v. the Netherlands [GC], no. 46410/99, § 54, ECHR 2006-XII; Abdulaziz, Cabales and Balkandali v. the United Kingdom, 28 May 1985, § 67, Series A no. 94; and Boujlifa v. France, 21 October 1997, § 42, Reports 1997-VI).

• EGMR, 30.05.2017 - 79480/13

  E.T. AND N.T. v. SWITZERLAND AND ITALY

  Nor does Article 3 entail any general obligation to give refugees financial assistance to enable them to maintain a certain standard of living (see Müslim v. Turkey, no. 53566/99, § 85, 26 April 2005; M.S.S. v. Belgium and Greece [GC], no. 30696/09, § 249, ECHR 2011; Tarakhel, cited above, § 95; and Hunde v. the Netherlands, no. 17931/16, § 51, 5 July 2016).
• EGMR, 23.01.2018 - 50613/12

  SAID GOOD v. THE NETHERLANDS

  The relevant domestic law and practice are set out in Hunde v. the Netherlands (dec.), no. 17931/16, §§ 25-32, 5 July 2016.