Rechtsprechung
| EGMR, 05.07.2016 - 7239/07 |
Zitiervorschläge
Tipp: Um den Kurzlink (hier: https://dejure.org/2016,24219) schnell in die Zwischenablage zu kopieren, können Sie die Tastenkombination Alt + R verwenden - auch ohne diesen Bereich zu öffnen.
Volltextveröffentlichung
- Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte
VIESTURS v. LATVIA
Inadmissible (englisch)
Sonstiges
- Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte (Verfahrensmitteilung)
[ENG]
Wird zitiert von ... (0) Neu Zitiert selbst (4)
- EGMR, 26.09.2006 - 35349/05
FLERI SOLER ET CAMILLERI c. MALTE
Auszug aus EGMR, 05.07.2016 - 7239/07
Accordingly, the Court will determine on the basis of the documents before it whether the six-month requirement laid down in Article 35 § 1 of the Convention has been complied with (see and compare Kemevuako v. the Netherlands (dec.), no. 65938/09, §§ 23 and 25, 1 June 2010; Fleri Soler and Camilleri v. Malta, no. 35349/05, § 32, ECHR 2006-X; and Foxley v. the United Kingdom (dec.), no. 33274/96, 12 October 1999). - EGMR, 01.06.2010 - 65938/09
KEMEVUAKO v. THE NETHERLANDS
Auszug aus EGMR, 05.07.2016 - 7239/07
Accordingly, the Court will determine on the basis of the documents before it whether the six-month requirement laid down in Article 35 § 1 of the Convention has been complied with (see and compare Kemevuako v. the Netherlands (dec.), no. 65938/09, §§ 23 and 25, 1 June 2010; Fleri Soler and Camilleri v. Malta, no. 35349/05, § 32, ECHR 2006-X; and Foxley v. the United Kingdom (dec.), no. 33274/96, 12 October 1999). - EGMR, 20.06.2000 - 33274/96
FOXLEY v. THE UNITED KINGDOM
Auszug aus EGMR, 05.07.2016 - 7239/07
Accordingly, the Court will determine on the basis of the documents before it whether the six-month requirement laid down in Article 35 § 1 of the Convention has been complied with (see and compare Kemevuako v. the Netherlands (dec.), no. 65938/09, §§ 23 and 25, 1 June 2010; Fleri Soler and Camilleri v. Malta, no. 35349/05, § 32, ECHR 2006-X; and Foxley v. the United Kingdom (dec.), no. 33274/96, 12 October 1999). - EGMR, 26.10.2010 - 46040/07
MARINA v. LATVIA
Auszug aus EGMR, 05.07.2016 - 7239/07
Where an applicant is entitled to be served ex officio with a written copy of the final domestic decision the object and purpose of the Convention are best served by counting the six-month period as running from the date of service of the written judgment (see Worm v. Austria, 29 August 1997, § 33, Reports of Judgments and Decisions 1997-V, see also Marina v. Latvia, no. 46040/07, §§ 39-44, 26 October 2010).