Volltextveröffentlichung

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

  ANDERSEN v. DENMARK

  Art. 6, Art. 6 Abs. 1, Art. 35, Art. 35 Abs. 1 MRK
  Inadmissible (englisch)

Wird zitiert von ... (0)Neu Zitiert selbst (8)

• EGMR, 25.03.1999 - 25444/94

  PÉLISSIER AND SASSI v. FRANCE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 05.09.2002 - 57204/00

  The Court recalls that the reasonableness of the length of the proceedings must be assessed in the light of the circumstances of the particular case and with regard to the criteria laid down in the Court's case-law, notably the complexity of the case, the conduct of the applicant and that of the authorities before which the case was brought (cf. Pélissier and Sassi v. France [GC], no. 25444/94, § 67, ECHR 1999-II).
• EGMR, 14.03.2000 - 37371/97

  NICHOLAS v. CYPRUS

  Auszug aus EGMR, 05.09.2002 - 57204/00

  As regards the applicant's complaint that she was not granted legal aid the Court recalls that Article 6 § 1 of the Convention does not guarantee a right to free legal aid in all civil cases (cf. e.g. Nicholas v. Cyprus (dec.), no. 37371/97, 14 March 2000 and Gnahore v. France, no. 40031/98, ECHR-IX).
• EGMR, 13.05.1980 - 6694/74

  ARTICO c. ITALIE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 05.09.2002 - 57204/00

  Also, it reiterates that Article 6 guarantees effective access to court in the determination of civil rights, which guarantee includes, in certain cases, the assistance of a lawyer when such assistance proves indispensable by reason of the complexity of the case in question (Airey v. Ireland judgment of 9 October 1979, Series A no. 37, pp. 15-16, § 26).

 
• EGMR, 19.09.2000 - 40031/98

  GNAHORE c. FRANCE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 05.09.2002 - 57204/00

  As regards the applicant's complaint that she was not granted legal aid the Court recalls that Article 6 § 1 of the Convention does not guarantee a right to free legal aid in all civil cases (cf. e.g. Nicholas v. Cyprus (dec.), no. 37371/97, 14 March 2000 and Gnahore v. France, no. 40031/98, ECHR-IX).
• EGMR, 19.03.1991 - 11069/84

  CARDOT c. FRANCE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 05.09.2002 - 57204/00

  On this point the Court refers to its established case-law (see e.g. the Cardot v. France judgment of 19 March 1991, Series A no. 200, p. 18, § 34 and Selmouni v. France [GC], no. 25803/94, § 74, ECHR 1999-V).
• EGMR, 04.12.1995 - 19753/92

  CIRICOSTA AND VIOLA v. ITALY

  Auszug aus EGMR, 05.09.2002 - 57204/00

  The Court reiterates that only delays attributable to the State may justify a finding of failure to comply with the "reasonable time" requirement (see e.g. Ciricosta and Viola v. Italy judgment of 4 December 1995, Series A no. 337-A, p. 10, § 28).
• EGMR, 27.10.1993 - 14448/88

  DOMBO BEHEER B.V. v. THE NETHERLANDS

  Auszug aus EGMR, 05.09.2002 - 57204/00

  Furthermore, the Courts reiterates that the right to a fair hearing entails, in both civil and criminal proceedings, that everyone who is a party to such proceedings shall have reasonable opportunity of presenting their case to the court under conditions which do not place him or her at a substantial disadvantage vis-à-vis his or her opponent, the essential aim being an equality of arms in the proceedings (see, among other authorities, Dombo Beheer B.V. v. the Netherlands judgment of 27 October 1993, Series A no. 274, p. 19, § 33; Ankerl v. Switzerland judgment of 23 October 1996, Reports of Judgments and Decisions 1996-V, pp. 1567-68, § 38 and the Nideröst-Huber v. Switzerland judgment of 18 February 1997, Reports 1997-I, p. 107, § 23).
• EGMR, 28.07.1999 - 25803/94

  Zur "Einzelfallprüfung" und "geltungszeitlichen Interpretation" im Rahmen des …

  Auszug aus EGMR, 05.09.2002 - 57204/00

  On this point the Court refers to its established case-law (see e.g. the Cardot v. France judgment of 19 March 1991, Series A no. 200, p. 18, § 34 and Selmouni v. France [GC], no. 25803/94, § 74, ECHR 1999-V).